Endoscopic submucosal dissection: Italian national survey on current practices, training and outcomes: Digestive and Liver Disease

R. Maselli, F. Iacopini, F. Azzolini, L. Petruzziello, M. Manno, L. De Luca, P. Cecinato, G. Fiori, T. Staiano, E. Rosa Rizzotto, S. Angeletti, A. Caruso, F. Coppola, G. Andrisani, E. Viale, G. Missale, A. Panarese, A. Mazzocchi, P. Cesaro, M. CampanaleP. Occhipinti, O. Tarantino, C. Crosta, P. Brosolo, S. Sferrazza, E. Rondonotti, A. Amato, L. Fuccio, G. Costamagna, A. Repici

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Aims: Most of the evidence supporting endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) comes from Asia. European data are primarily reported by specialized referral centers and thus may not be representative of common European ESD practice. The aim of this study is to understand the current state of ESD practice across Italian endoscopy centers. Methods: All Italian endoscopists who were known to perform ESD were invited to complete a structured questionnaire including: operator features and competencies, ESD training details and clinical outcomes over a 2-year period. Results: Twenty-nine operators from 23 centers (69% response rate) completed the questionnaire: 18 (62%) were 150 in 8 (27.5%). Colorectal ESD was predominant for operators with an experience >80 cases. En-bloc resection rates ranged from 77.2 to 97.2% depending on the anatomic location with an R0 resection rate range of 75.3–93.6%. ESD perforation rates in the colon and rectum were significantly lower when experience was >150 compared to 80–150 cases (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.006 for colon and rectum, respectively). Conclusion: ESD in Italy is performed by a significant number of operators. Overall, Italian endoscopists performing ESD have achieved a good competence level. However, there is much variability in training protocols, initial supervision of procedures, practice settings, case mix and procedural volume/year that are likely responsible for some of the suboptimal resectional outcomes and increased perforation risk, mainly in the colon. Standardized training programs, practice parameters and auditing of outcomes are required. © 2019 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-71
Number of pages8
JournalDig. Liver Dis.
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Early GI tumor
  • Endoscopy
  • ESD
  • Survey
  • adult
  • Article
  • clinical outcome
  • endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • endoscopist
  • female
  • human
  • job experience
  • male
  • medical practice
  • middle aged
  • priority journal
  • structured questionnaire
  • surgical training
  • adverse event
  • aged
  • clinical competence
  • colon
  • colonoscopy
  • dissection
  • education
  • gastroscopy
  • intestine mucosa
  • Italy
  • learning curve
  • medical education
  • postoperative complication
  • procedures
  • questionnaire
  • rectum
  • retrospective study
  • stomach mucosa
  • surgery
  • treatment outcome
  • Aged
  • Clinical Competence
  • Colon
  • Colonoscopy
  • Dissection
  • Education, Medical, Graduate
  • Female
  • Gastric Mucosa
  • Gastroscopy
  • Humans
  • Intestinal Mucosa
  • Learning Curve
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Rectum
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Endoscopic submucosal dissection: Italian national survey on current practices, training and outcomes: Digestive and Liver Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this