TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic submucosal dissection of scar-embedded rectal polyps
T2 - A prospective study (Esd in scar-embedded rectal polyps)
AU - Azzolini, F.
AU - Camellini, L.
AU - Sassatelli, R.
AU - Sereni, G.
AU - Biolchini, F.
AU - Decembrino, F.
AU - De Marco, L.
AU - Iori, V.
AU - Tioli, C.
AU - Cavina, M.
AU - Bedogni, G.
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Background & aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed for en bloc resection of superficial neoplasm of the digestive tract. We evaluated feasibility and safety of ESD, as a salvage therapy of large refractory rectal polyps, in a tertiary care setting. Methods: We prospectively enrolled in the present study and treated by ESD 11 consecutive patients with rectal polyps (median diameter 3.5. cm; range 2-5. cm), who had previously undergone several attempts of endoscopic resection and not suitable for further standard endoscopic treatment. The ESD was carried out with a standard needle knife. Follow up examinations were scheduled at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: We achieved apparently complete resection of polyps in 10/11 patients. In one patient ESD was interrupted and the pathology of the resected fragment showed deep submucosal infiltration; this patient underwent surgery. Deep and lateral margins were shown to be free of neoplasm (radical resection) in six out of 11 patients. However all the 10 patients with apparently complete resection were free of recurrence after a mean follow up of 19.2 months (12-24). A T1 adenocarcinoma was radically resected by ESD, with no recurrence. We recorded 2 cases of subcutaneous emphysema, both treated conservatively. Conclusions: Radical resection is difficult to be achieved by ESD in patients with rectal scar-embedded polyps. Nevertheless ESD may be proposed as a definitive treatment of selected patients with refractory polyps, avoiding surgery in the majority of them.
AB - Background & aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed for en bloc resection of superficial neoplasm of the digestive tract. We evaluated feasibility and safety of ESD, as a salvage therapy of large refractory rectal polyps, in a tertiary care setting. Methods: We prospectively enrolled in the present study and treated by ESD 11 consecutive patients with rectal polyps (median diameter 3.5. cm; range 2-5. cm), who had previously undergone several attempts of endoscopic resection and not suitable for further standard endoscopic treatment. The ESD was carried out with a standard needle knife. Follow up examinations were scheduled at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: We achieved apparently complete resection of polyps in 10/11 patients. In one patient ESD was interrupted and the pathology of the resected fragment showed deep submucosal infiltration; this patient underwent surgery. Deep and lateral margins were shown to be free of neoplasm (radical resection) in six out of 11 patients. However all the 10 patients with apparently complete resection were free of recurrence after a mean follow up of 19.2 months (12-24). A T1 adenocarcinoma was radically resected by ESD, with no recurrence. We recorded 2 cases of subcutaneous emphysema, both treated conservatively. Conclusions: Radical resection is difficult to be achieved by ESD in patients with rectal scar-embedded polyps. Nevertheless ESD may be proposed as a definitive treatment of selected patients with refractory polyps, avoiding surgery in the majority of them.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052518791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052518791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.04.013
DO - 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.04.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 21640691
AN - SCOPUS:80052518791
VL - 35
SP - 572
EP - 579
JO - Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology
JF - Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology
SN - 2210-7401
IS - 8-9
ER -