Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery: a Focus on Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old

Maria Carmen Lirosi, Flavio Tirelli, Alberto Biondi, Maria Cristina Mele, Cristina Larotonda, Laura Lorenzon, Domenico D’Ugo, Antonio Gasbarrini, Roberto Persiani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol can effectively improve perioperative outcomes in surgical patients by reducing complication rates and hospital stay. However, its application in elderly patients has yielded contradictory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes in a cohort of elderly patients undergoing colorectal resection in our unit before and after the introduction of ERAS. Methods: From 328 patients undergoing colorectal surgery in our unit over a 2-year period (2015–2016), 114 patients ≥ 75 years of age were selected. The patients were categorized according to perioperative treatment as pre-ERAS and ERAS patients (respectively, 53 vs 61 patients), and the groups were compared for statistical purposes. Outcome measures included length of hospital stay, recovery of bowel functions, oral feeding, postoperative complications, and readmissions. Compliance with the ERAS protocol was also measured. Results: Groups were homogeneous for all the clinical-surgical variables, with the sole exception of the Charlson index, which was more severe in the ERAS group (p = 0.012). Compared with control patients, ERAS patients reported improved functional recovery (time to first flatus, stool, and oral feeding; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was reduced in ERAS patients overall and by side of resection, excluding rectal procedures. No differences were observed regarding postoperative complications. Of note, an optimal adherence to the protocol was reported, with 79% of items respected. Conclusions: ERAS can be considered safe in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery with a high comorbidity index, providing a reduction in hospital stay and improving short-term postoperative outcomes. Finally, the protocol application was feasible, with a high adherence to the items in this subset of patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Length of Stay
Flatulence
Recovery of Function
Comorbidity

Keywords

  • Colorectal surgery
  • Elderly patients
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery
  • ERAS
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery : a Focus on Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old. / Lirosi, Maria Carmen; Tirelli, Flavio; Biondi, Alberto; Mele, Maria Cristina; Larotonda, Cristina; Lorenzon, Laura; D’Ugo, Domenico; Gasbarrini, Antonio; Persiani, Roberto.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec8ea570d80e43959afca4fea6bbea99,
title = "Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery: a Focus on Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old",
abstract = "Background: An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol can effectively improve perioperative outcomes in surgical patients by reducing complication rates and hospital stay. However, its application in elderly patients has yielded contradictory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes in a cohort of elderly patients undergoing colorectal resection in our unit before and after the introduction of ERAS. Methods: From 328 patients undergoing colorectal surgery in our unit over a 2-year period (2015–2016), 114 patients ≥ 75 years of age were selected. The patients were categorized according to perioperative treatment as pre-ERAS and ERAS patients (respectively, 53 vs 61 patients), and the groups were compared for statistical purposes. Outcome measures included length of hospital stay, recovery of bowel functions, oral feeding, postoperative complications, and readmissions. Compliance with the ERAS protocol was also measured. Results: Groups were homogeneous for all the clinical-surgical variables, with the sole exception of the Charlson index, which was more severe in the ERAS group (p = 0.012). Compared with control patients, ERAS patients reported improved functional recovery (time to first flatus, stool, and oral feeding; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was reduced in ERAS patients overall and by side of resection, excluding rectal procedures. No differences were observed regarding postoperative complications. Of note, an optimal adherence to the protocol was reported, with 79{\%} of items respected. Conclusions: ERAS can be considered safe in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery with a high comorbidity index, providing a reduction in hospital stay and improving short-term postoperative outcomes. Finally, the protocol application was feasible, with a high adherence to the items in this subset of patients.",
keywords = "Colorectal surgery, Elderly patients, Enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS, Outcomes",
author = "Lirosi, {Maria Carmen} and Flavio Tirelli and Alberto Biondi and Mele, {Maria Cristina} and Cristina Larotonda and Laura Lorenzon and Domenico D’Ugo and Antonio Gasbarrini and Roberto Persiani",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-018-3943-2",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery

T2 - a Focus on Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old

AU - Lirosi, Maria Carmen

AU - Tirelli, Flavio

AU - Biondi, Alberto

AU - Mele, Maria Cristina

AU - Larotonda, Cristina

AU - Lorenzon, Laura

AU - D’Ugo, Domenico

AU - Gasbarrini, Antonio

AU - Persiani, Roberto

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol can effectively improve perioperative outcomes in surgical patients by reducing complication rates and hospital stay. However, its application in elderly patients has yielded contradictory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes in a cohort of elderly patients undergoing colorectal resection in our unit before and after the introduction of ERAS. Methods: From 328 patients undergoing colorectal surgery in our unit over a 2-year period (2015–2016), 114 patients ≥ 75 years of age were selected. The patients were categorized according to perioperative treatment as pre-ERAS and ERAS patients (respectively, 53 vs 61 patients), and the groups were compared for statistical purposes. Outcome measures included length of hospital stay, recovery of bowel functions, oral feeding, postoperative complications, and readmissions. Compliance with the ERAS protocol was also measured. Results: Groups were homogeneous for all the clinical-surgical variables, with the sole exception of the Charlson index, which was more severe in the ERAS group (p = 0.012). Compared with control patients, ERAS patients reported improved functional recovery (time to first flatus, stool, and oral feeding; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was reduced in ERAS patients overall and by side of resection, excluding rectal procedures. No differences were observed regarding postoperative complications. Of note, an optimal adherence to the protocol was reported, with 79% of items respected. Conclusions: ERAS can be considered safe in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery with a high comorbidity index, providing a reduction in hospital stay and improving short-term postoperative outcomes. Finally, the protocol application was feasible, with a high adherence to the items in this subset of patients.

AB - Background: An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol can effectively improve perioperative outcomes in surgical patients by reducing complication rates and hospital stay. However, its application in elderly patients has yielded contradictory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes in a cohort of elderly patients undergoing colorectal resection in our unit before and after the introduction of ERAS. Methods: From 328 patients undergoing colorectal surgery in our unit over a 2-year period (2015–2016), 114 patients ≥ 75 years of age were selected. The patients were categorized according to perioperative treatment as pre-ERAS and ERAS patients (respectively, 53 vs 61 patients), and the groups were compared for statistical purposes. Outcome measures included length of hospital stay, recovery of bowel functions, oral feeding, postoperative complications, and readmissions. Compliance with the ERAS protocol was also measured. Results: Groups were homogeneous for all the clinical-surgical variables, with the sole exception of the Charlson index, which was more severe in the ERAS group (p = 0.012). Compared with control patients, ERAS patients reported improved functional recovery (time to first flatus, stool, and oral feeding; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was reduced in ERAS patients overall and by side of resection, excluding rectal procedures. No differences were observed regarding postoperative complications. Of note, an optimal adherence to the protocol was reported, with 79% of items respected. Conclusions: ERAS can be considered safe in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery with a high comorbidity index, providing a reduction in hospital stay and improving short-term postoperative outcomes. Finally, the protocol application was feasible, with a high adherence to the items in this subset of patients.

KW - Colorectal surgery

KW - Elderly patients

KW - Enhanced recovery after surgery

KW - ERAS

KW - Outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053461357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053461357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-018-3943-2

DO - 10.1007/s11605-018-3943-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053461357

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

ER -