TY - JOUR
T1 - Epiaortic Ultrasound to Prevent Stroke in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
AU - Biancari, Fausto
AU - Santini, Francesco
AU - Tauriainen, Tuomas
AU - Bancone, Ciro
AU - Ruggieri, Vito G.
AU - Perrotti, Andrea
AU - Gherli, Riccardo
AU - Demal, Till
AU - Dalén, Magnus
AU - Santarpino, Giuseppe
AU - Rubino, Antonino S.
AU - Nardella, Saverio
AU - Nicolini, Francesco
AU - Zanobini, Marco
AU - De Feo, Marisa
AU - Onorati, Francesco
AU - Mariscalco, Giovanni
AU - Gatti, Giuseppe
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Background: Epiaortic ultrasonography (EAU) is a valid imaging method to detect atherosclerotic changes of the ascending aorta and to guide surgical strategies for the prevention of cerebral embolism in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, its use is not widespread. Methods: The impact of EAU on the outcome after isolated CABG was investigated in patients from the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) registry. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed to substantiate the findings of this observational study. Results: EAU was performed intraoperatively in 673 of 7241 patients (9.3%) from the E-CABG registry. In the overall series, the rates of stroke without and with aortic manipulation were 0.3% and 1.3%, respectively (P = .003). In 660 propensity score–matched pairs, EAU was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke (0.6% vs 2.6%, P = .007). A literature search yielded 5 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. These studies, along with the present one, included 11,496 patients, of whom 3026 (25.7%) underwent intraoperative EAU. Their rate of postoperative stroke was significantly lower than in patients not investigated with EAU (pooled rate, 0.6% vs 1.9%; risk ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.66; I2 = 0%). On the basis of these pooled rates, the number needed to treat to prevent 1 stroke is 76.9. Conclusions: Avoiding aortic manipulation is associated with the lowest risk of stroke in patients undergoing CABG. When manipulation of the ascending aorta is planned, EAU is effective in guiding the surgical strategy to reduce the risk for embolic stroke in these patients.
AB - Background: Epiaortic ultrasonography (EAU) is a valid imaging method to detect atherosclerotic changes of the ascending aorta and to guide surgical strategies for the prevention of cerebral embolism in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, its use is not widespread. Methods: The impact of EAU on the outcome after isolated CABG was investigated in patients from the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) registry. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed to substantiate the findings of this observational study. Results: EAU was performed intraoperatively in 673 of 7241 patients (9.3%) from the E-CABG registry. In the overall series, the rates of stroke without and with aortic manipulation were 0.3% and 1.3%, respectively (P = .003). In 660 propensity score–matched pairs, EAU was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke (0.6% vs 2.6%, P = .007). A literature search yielded 5 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. These studies, along with the present one, included 11,496 patients, of whom 3026 (25.7%) underwent intraoperative EAU. Their rate of postoperative stroke was significantly lower than in patients not investigated with EAU (pooled rate, 0.6% vs 1.9%; risk ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.66; I2 = 0%). On the basis of these pooled rates, the number needed to treat to prevent 1 stroke is 76.9. Conclusions: Avoiding aortic manipulation is associated with the lowest risk of stroke in patients undergoing CABG. When manipulation of the ascending aorta is planned, EAU is effective in guiding the surgical strategy to reduce the risk for embolic stroke in these patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076243562&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076243562&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.078
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.078
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31421104
AN - SCOPUS:85076243562
VL - 109
SP - 294
EP - 301
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
SN - 0003-4975
IS - 1
ER -