Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics

Giuseppe Schiavone, Matteo Mameli, Giovanni Boniolo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The suggestion that deliberative democratic approaches would suit the management of bioethical policymaking in democratic pluralistic societies has triggered what has been called the deliberative turn in health policy and bioethics. Most of the empirical work in this area has focused on the allocation of healthcare resources and priority setting at the local or national level. The variety of the more or less articulated theoretical efforts behind such initiatives is remarkable and has been accompanied, to date, by an overall lack of method specificity. We propose a set of methodological requirements for online deliberative procedures for bioethics. We provide a theoretical motivation for these requirements. In particular, we discuss and adapt an epistocratic proposal and argue that, regardless of its merits as a general political theory, a more refined version of its normative claims can generate a useful framework for the design of bioethical forums that combine maximal inclusiveness with informed and reasonable deliberation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-280
Number of pages9
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 17 2014

Fingerprint

Bioethics
bioethics
pluralistic society
Resource Allocation
political theory
Health Policy
deliberation
health policy
Delivery of Health Care
lack
management
resources

Keywords

  • bioethics
  • deliberative democracy
  • epistocracy
  • participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics. / Schiavone, Giuseppe; Mameli, Matteo; Boniolo, Giovanni.

In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Vol. 24, No. 3, 17.06.2014, p. 272-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schiavone, Giuseppe ; Mameli, Matteo ; Boniolo, Giovanni. / Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics. In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 272-280.
@article{3f94e81f8b2c43ca973502745004b283,
title = "Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics",
abstract = "The suggestion that deliberative democratic approaches would suit the management of bioethical policymaking in democratic pluralistic societies has triggered what has been called the deliberative turn in health policy and bioethics. Most of the empirical work in this area has focused on the allocation of healthcare resources and priority setting at the local or national level. The variety of the more or less articulated theoretical efforts behind such initiatives is remarkable and has been accompanied, to date, by an overall lack of method specificity. We propose a set of methodological requirements for online deliberative procedures for bioethics. We provide a theoretical motivation for these requirements. In particular, we discuss and adapt an epistocratic proposal and argue that, regardless of its merits as a general political theory, a more refined version of its normative claims can generate a useful framework for the design of bioethical forums that combine maximal inclusiveness with informed and reasonable deliberation.",
keywords = "bioethics, deliberative democracy, epistocracy, participation",
author = "Giuseppe Schiavone and Matteo Mameli and Giovanni Boniolo",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1017/S0963180114000590",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "272--280",
journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",
issn = "0963-1801",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics

AU - Schiavone, Giuseppe

AU - Mameli, Matteo

AU - Boniolo, Giovanni

PY - 2014/6/17

Y1 - 2014/6/17

N2 - The suggestion that deliberative democratic approaches would suit the management of bioethical policymaking in democratic pluralistic societies has triggered what has been called the deliberative turn in health policy and bioethics. Most of the empirical work in this area has focused on the allocation of healthcare resources and priority setting at the local or national level. The variety of the more or less articulated theoretical efforts behind such initiatives is remarkable and has been accompanied, to date, by an overall lack of method specificity. We propose a set of methodological requirements for online deliberative procedures for bioethics. We provide a theoretical motivation for these requirements. In particular, we discuss and adapt an epistocratic proposal and argue that, regardless of its merits as a general political theory, a more refined version of its normative claims can generate a useful framework for the design of bioethical forums that combine maximal inclusiveness with informed and reasonable deliberation.

AB - The suggestion that deliberative democratic approaches would suit the management of bioethical policymaking in democratic pluralistic societies has triggered what has been called the deliberative turn in health policy and bioethics. Most of the empirical work in this area has focused on the allocation of healthcare resources and priority setting at the local or national level. The variety of the more or less articulated theoretical efforts behind such initiatives is remarkable and has been accompanied, to date, by an overall lack of method specificity. We propose a set of methodological requirements for online deliberative procedures for bioethics. We provide a theoretical motivation for these requirements. In particular, we discuss and adapt an epistocratic proposal and argue that, regardless of its merits as a general political theory, a more refined version of its normative claims can generate a useful framework for the design of bioethical forums that combine maximal inclusiveness with informed and reasonable deliberation.

KW - bioethics

KW - deliberative democracy

KW - epistocracy

KW - participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930849252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930849252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0963180114000590

DO - 10.1017/S0963180114000590

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 272

EP - 280

JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

SN - 0963-1801

IS - 3

ER -