ERD-based online brain-machine interfaces (BMI) in the context of neurorehabilitation: Optimizing BMI learning and performance

Surjo R. Soekadar, Matthias Witkowski, Jürgen Mellinger, Ander Ramos, Niels Birbaumer, Leonardo G. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Event-related desynchronization (ERD) of sensori-motor rhythms (SMR) can be used for online brain-machine interface (BMI) control, but yields challenges related to the stability of ERD and feedback strategy to optimize BMI learning. Here, we compared two approaches to this challenge in 20 right-handed healthy subjects (HS, five sessions each, S1-S5) and four stroke patients (SP, 15 sessions each, S1-S15). ERD was recorded from a 275-sensor MEG system. During daily training, motor imagery-induced ERD led to visual and proprioceptive feedback delivered through an orthotic device attached to the subjects' hand and fingers. Group A trained with a heterogeneous reference value (RV) for ERD detection with binary feedback and Group B with a homogenous RV and graded feedback (10 HS and 2 SP in each group). HS in Group B showed better BMI performance than Group A (p <0.001) and improved BMI control from S1 to S5 ( p=0.012) while Group A did not. In spite of the small n, SP in Group B showed a trend for a higher BMI performance (p = 0.06) and learning was significantly better (p <0.05). Using a homogeneous RV and graded feedback led to improved modulation of ipsilesional activity resulting in superior BMI learning relative to use of a heterogeneous RV and binary feedback.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6035989
Pages (from-to)542-549
Number of pages8
JournalIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Brain-Computer Interfaces
Brain
Feedback
Reference Values
Sensory Feedback
Orthotics
Orthotic Devices
Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Fingers
Machine Learning
Neurological Rehabilitation
Healthy Volunteers
Hand
Stroke
Modulation
Learning
Sensors

Keywords

  • Brain-machine nterface
  • event-related desynchronization
  • neurorehabilitation
  • stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

ERD-based online brain-machine interfaces (BMI) in the context of neurorehabilitation : Optimizing BMI learning and performance. / Soekadar, Surjo R.; Witkowski, Matthias; Mellinger, Jürgen; Ramos, Ander; Birbaumer, Niels; Cohen, Leonardo G.

In: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 5, 6035989, 10.2011, p. 542-549.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soekadar, Surjo R. ; Witkowski, Matthias ; Mellinger, Jürgen ; Ramos, Ander ; Birbaumer, Niels ; Cohen, Leonardo G. / ERD-based online brain-machine interfaces (BMI) in the context of neurorehabilitation : Optimizing BMI learning and performance. In: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2011 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 542-549.
@article{7970c392d53f400880b6a9c48052e36d,
title = "ERD-based online brain-machine interfaces (BMI) in the context of neurorehabilitation: Optimizing BMI learning and performance",
abstract = "Event-related desynchronization (ERD) of sensori-motor rhythms (SMR) can be used for online brain-machine interface (BMI) control, but yields challenges related to the stability of ERD and feedback strategy to optimize BMI learning. Here, we compared two approaches to this challenge in 20 right-handed healthy subjects (HS, five sessions each, S1-S5) and four stroke patients (SP, 15 sessions each, S1-S15). ERD was recorded from a 275-sensor MEG system. During daily training, motor imagery-induced ERD led to visual and proprioceptive feedback delivered through an orthotic device attached to the subjects' hand and fingers. Group A trained with a heterogeneous reference value (RV) for ERD detection with binary feedback and Group B with a homogenous RV and graded feedback (10 HS and 2 SP in each group). HS in Group B showed better BMI performance than Group A (p <0.001) and improved BMI control from S1 to S5 ( p=0.012) while Group A did not. In spite of the small n, SP in Group B showed a trend for a higher BMI performance (p = 0.06) and learning was significantly better (p <0.05). Using a homogeneous RV and graded feedback led to improved modulation of ipsilesional activity resulting in superior BMI learning relative to use of a heterogeneous RV and binary feedback.",
keywords = "Brain-machine nterface, event-related desynchronization, neurorehabilitation, stroke",
author = "Soekadar, {Surjo R.} and Matthias Witkowski and J{\"u}rgen Mellinger and Ander Ramos and Niels Birbaumer and Cohen, {Leonardo G.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2166809",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "542--549",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering",
issn = "1534-4320",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ERD-based online brain-machine interfaces (BMI) in the context of neurorehabilitation

T2 - Optimizing BMI learning and performance

AU - Soekadar, Surjo R.

AU - Witkowski, Matthias

AU - Mellinger, Jürgen

AU - Ramos, Ander

AU - Birbaumer, Niels

AU - Cohen, Leonardo G.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Event-related desynchronization (ERD) of sensori-motor rhythms (SMR) can be used for online brain-machine interface (BMI) control, but yields challenges related to the stability of ERD and feedback strategy to optimize BMI learning. Here, we compared two approaches to this challenge in 20 right-handed healthy subjects (HS, five sessions each, S1-S5) and four stroke patients (SP, 15 sessions each, S1-S15). ERD was recorded from a 275-sensor MEG system. During daily training, motor imagery-induced ERD led to visual and proprioceptive feedback delivered through an orthotic device attached to the subjects' hand and fingers. Group A trained with a heterogeneous reference value (RV) for ERD detection with binary feedback and Group B with a homogenous RV and graded feedback (10 HS and 2 SP in each group). HS in Group B showed better BMI performance than Group A (p <0.001) and improved BMI control from S1 to S5 ( p=0.012) while Group A did not. In spite of the small n, SP in Group B showed a trend for a higher BMI performance (p = 0.06) and learning was significantly better (p <0.05). Using a homogeneous RV and graded feedback led to improved modulation of ipsilesional activity resulting in superior BMI learning relative to use of a heterogeneous RV and binary feedback.

AB - Event-related desynchronization (ERD) of sensori-motor rhythms (SMR) can be used for online brain-machine interface (BMI) control, but yields challenges related to the stability of ERD and feedback strategy to optimize BMI learning. Here, we compared two approaches to this challenge in 20 right-handed healthy subjects (HS, five sessions each, S1-S5) and four stroke patients (SP, 15 sessions each, S1-S15). ERD was recorded from a 275-sensor MEG system. During daily training, motor imagery-induced ERD led to visual and proprioceptive feedback delivered through an orthotic device attached to the subjects' hand and fingers. Group A trained with a heterogeneous reference value (RV) for ERD detection with binary feedback and Group B with a homogenous RV and graded feedback (10 HS and 2 SP in each group). HS in Group B showed better BMI performance than Group A (p <0.001) and improved BMI control from S1 to S5 ( p=0.012) while Group A did not. In spite of the small n, SP in Group B showed a trend for a higher BMI performance (p = 0.06) and learning was significantly better (p <0.05). Using a homogeneous RV and graded feedback led to improved modulation of ipsilesional activity resulting in superior BMI learning relative to use of a heterogeneous RV and binary feedback.

KW - Brain-machine nterface

KW - event-related desynchronization

KW - neurorehabilitation

KW - stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054083441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054083441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2166809

DO - 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2166809

M3 - Article

C2 - 21984519

AN - SCOPUS:80054083441

VL - 19

SP - 542

EP - 549

JO - IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

JF - IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

SN - 1534-4320

IS - 5

M1 - 6035989

ER -