Estimation of cardiovascular risk: total cholesterol versus lipoprotein profile

Adriana Branchi, Angelo Rovellini, Anna M. Fiorenza, Adriana Torri, Wally Prandi, Claudio Tomella, Monica Molgora, Augusta Cardena, Claudio Velati, Laura Arcangeli, Domenico Sommariva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The complete lipoprotein profile is thought to give more information about the individual risk of coronary heart disease than total cholesterol alone. Although total cholesterol has a low sensitivity in the correct assessment of the risk of coronary heart disease, it may be of value in screening programs because of its low cost. In this study of 5,335 subjects, total cholesterol gave a different assessment of coronary heart disease risk (United States National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines) in 25% of subjects than the complete lipoprotein profile. Differences in risk assignment were mainly accounted for by high- and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (Friedewald equation). The calculated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was highly correlated with the value measured with a mixed ultracentrifugation and precipitation procedure. However, calculated values gave estimates of coronary heart disease risk which were 20% different from those from measure values. In 200 subjects in whom the lipoprotein profile was assessed three times in 1 year, the total cholesterol low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol varied by more than 30 mg/dl (0.78 mmol/l) in 52% and 50%, respectively, triglycerides by more than 30 mg/dl (0.34 mmol/l) in 75%, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol by more than 15 mg/dl (0.39 mmol/l) in 34%. Compared with the mean of the measurements, the single measurement of total cholesterol misclassified 48% of subjects, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 60%, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 12%, and 28%. We conclude that total cholesterol alone may be misleading in the assignment of coronary heart disease risk. Calculation of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, although less accurate than desirable, is the only way of evaluating this in clinical practice. Finally, repeated lipid measurements are required to assess coronary heart disease risk accurately.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-112
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Research
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1994

Fingerprint

Coronary Disease
Cholesterol
LDL Cholesterol
Lipoproteins
HDL Cholesterol
Ultracentrifugation
lipoprotein cholesterol
Screening
Triglycerides
Education
Guidelines
Lipids
Costs and Cost Analysis
Costs

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular risk assessment
  • Lipoprotein profile
  • Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol estimation
  • Serum lipid variability
  • Total cholesterol

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Estimation of cardiovascular risk : total cholesterol versus lipoprotein profile. / Branchi, Adriana; Rovellini, Angelo; Fiorenza, Anna M.; Torri, Adriana; Prandi, Wally; Tomella, Claudio; Molgora, Monica; Cardena, Augusta; Velati, Claudio; Arcangeli, Laura; Sommariva, Domenico.

In: International Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, 06.1994, p. 106-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Branchi, A, Rovellini, A, Fiorenza, AM, Torri, A, Prandi, W, Tomella, C, Molgora, M, Cardena, A, Velati, C, Arcangeli, L & Sommariva, D 1994, 'Estimation of cardiovascular risk: total cholesterol versus lipoprotein profile', International Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 106-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02593910
Branchi, Adriana ; Rovellini, Angelo ; Fiorenza, Anna M. ; Torri, Adriana ; Prandi, Wally ; Tomella, Claudio ; Molgora, Monica ; Cardena, Augusta ; Velati, Claudio ; Arcangeli, Laura ; Sommariva, Domenico. / Estimation of cardiovascular risk : total cholesterol versus lipoprotein profile. In: International Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Research. 1994 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 106-112.
@article{3c8b25f3090143aeb8473242f1be6859,
title = "Estimation of cardiovascular risk: total cholesterol versus lipoprotein profile",
abstract = "The complete lipoprotein profile is thought to give more information about the individual risk of coronary heart disease than total cholesterol alone. Although total cholesterol has a low sensitivity in the correct assessment of the risk of coronary heart disease, it may be of value in screening programs because of its low cost. In this study of 5,335 subjects, total cholesterol gave a different assessment of coronary heart disease risk (United States National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines) in 25{\%} of subjects than the complete lipoprotein profile. Differences in risk assignment were mainly accounted for by high- and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (Friedewald equation). The calculated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was highly correlated with the value measured with a mixed ultracentrifugation and precipitation procedure. However, calculated values gave estimates of coronary heart disease risk which were 20{\%} different from those from measure values. In 200 subjects in whom the lipoprotein profile was assessed three times in 1 year, the total cholesterol low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol varied by more than 30 mg/dl (0.78 mmol/l) in 52{\%} and 50{\%}, respectively, triglycerides by more than 30 mg/dl (0.34 mmol/l) in 75{\%}, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol by more than 15 mg/dl (0.39 mmol/l) in 34{\%}. Compared with the mean of the measurements, the single measurement of total cholesterol misclassified 48{\%} of subjects, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 60{\%}, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 12{\%}, and 28{\%}. We conclude that total cholesterol alone may be misleading in the assignment of coronary heart disease risk. Calculation of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, although less accurate than desirable, is the only way of evaluating this in clinical practice. Finally, repeated lipid measurements are required to assess coronary heart disease risk accurately.",
keywords = "Cardiovascular risk assessment, Lipoprotein profile, Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol estimation, Serum lipid variability, Total cholesterol",
author = "Adriana Branchi and Angelo Rovellini and Fiorenza, {Anna M.} and Adriana Torri and Wally Prandi and Claudio Tomella and Monica Molgora and Augusta Cardena and Claudio Velati and Laura Arcangeli and Domenico Sommariva",
year = "1994",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF02593910",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "106--112",
journal = "Ricerca in Clinica e in Laboratorio",
issn = "0940-5437",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation of cardiovascular risk

T2 - total cholesterol versus lipoprotein profile

AU - Branchi, Adriana

AU - Rovellini, Angelo

AU - Fiorenza, Anna M.

AU - Torri, Adriana

AU - Prandi, Wally

AU - Tomella, Claudio

AU - Molgora, Monica

AU - Cardena, Augusta

AU - Velati, Claudio

AU - Arcangeli, Laura

AU - Sommariva, Domenico

PY - 1994/6

Y1 - 1994/6

N2 - The complete lipoprotein profile is thought to give more information about the individual risk of coronary heart disease than total cholesterol alone. Although total cholesterol has a low sensitivity in the correct assessment of the risk of coronary heart disease, it may be of value in screening programs because of its low cost. In this study of 5,335 subjects, total cholesterol gave a different assessment of coronary heart disease risk (United States National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines) in 25% of subjects than the complete lipoprotein profile. Differences in risk assignment were mainly accounted for by high- and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (Friedewald equation). The calculated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was highly correlated with the value measured with a mixed ultracentrifugation and precipitation procedure. However, calculated values gave estimates of coronary heart disease risk which were 20% different from those from measure values. In 200 subjects in whom the lipoprotein profile was assessed three times in 1 year, the total cholesterol low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol varied by more than 30 mg/dl (0.78 mmol/l) in 52% and 50%, respectively, triglycerides by more than 30 mg/dl (0.34 mmol/l) in 75%, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol by more than 15 mg/dl (0.39 mmol/l) in 34%. Compared with the mean of the measurements, the single measurement of total cholesterol misclassified 48% of subjects, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 60%, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 12%, and 28%. We conclude that total cholesterol alone may be misleading in the assignment of coronary heart disease risk. Calculation of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, although less accurate than desirable, is the only way of evaluating this in clinical practice. Finally, repeated lipid measurements are required to assess coronary heart disease risk accurately.

AB - The complete lipoprotein profile is thought to give more information about the individual risk of coronary heart disease than total cholesterol alone. Although total cholesterol has a low sensitivity in the correct assessment of the risk of coronary heart disease, it may be of value in screening programs because of its low cost. In this study of 5,335 subjects, total cholesterol gave a different assessment of coronary heart disease risk (United States National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines) in 25% of subjects than the complete lipoprotein profile. Differences in risk assignment were mainly accounted for by high- and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (Friedewald equation). The calculated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was highly correlated with the value measured with a mixed ultracentrifugation and precipitation procedure. However, calculated values gave estimates of coronary heart disease risk which were 20% different from those from measure values. In 200 subjects in whom the lipoprotein profile was assessed three times in 1 year, the total cholesterol low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol varied by more than 30 mg/dl (0.78 mmol/l) in 52% and 50%, respectively, triglycerides by more than 30 mg/dl (0.34 mmol/l) in 75%, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol by more than 15 mg/dl (0.39 mmol/l) in 34%. Compared with the mean of the measurements, the single measurement of total cholesterol misclassified 48% of subjects, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 60%, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 12%, and 28%. We conclude that total cholesterol alone may be misleading in the assignment of coronary heart disease risk. Calculation of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, although less accurate than desirable, is the only way of evaluating this in clinical practice. Finally, repeated lipid measurements are required to assess coronary heart disease risk accurately.

KW - Cardiovascular risk assessment

KW - Lipoprotein profile

KW - Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol estimation

KW - Serum lipid variability

KW - Total cholesterol

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028041732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028041732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02593910

DO - 10.1007/BF02593910

M3 - Article

C2 - 7919426

AN - SCOPUS:0028041732

VL - 24

SP - 106

EP - 112

JO - Ricerca in Clinica e in Laboratorio

JF - Ricerca in Clinica e in Laboratorio

SN - 0940-5437

IS - 2

ER -