Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program: Challenges for survey methods

Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Gennaro Esposito, Silvia Brezzi, Angela Brachini, Patrizio Raggi, Antonio Federici

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The cytological screening programme of Viterbo has completed the second round of invitations to the entire target population (age 25-64). From a public health perspective, it is important to know the Pap-test coverage rate and the use of opportunistic screening. The most commonly used study design is the survey, but the validity of self-reports and the assumptions made about non respondents are often questioned. Methods: From the target population, 940 women were sampled, and responded to a telephone interview about Pap-test utilisation. The answers were compared with the screening program registry; comparing the dates of Pap-tests reported by both sources. Sensitivity analyses were performed for coverage over a 36-month period, according to various assumptions regarding non respondents. Results: The response rate was 68%. The coverage over 36 months was 86.4% if we assume that non respondents had the same coverage as respondents, 66% if we assume they were not covered at all, and 74.6% if we adjust for screening compliance in the non respondents. The sensitivity and specificity of the question, "have you ever had a Pap test with the screening programme" were 84.5% and 82.2% respectively. The test dates reported in the interview tended to be more recent than those reported in the registry, but 68% were within 12 months of each other. Conclusion: Surveys are useful tools to understand the effectiveness of a screening programme and women's self-report was sufficiently reliable in our setting, but the coverage estimates were strongly influenced by the assumptions we made regarding non respondents.

Original languageEnglish
Article number36
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 17 2006

Fingerprint

Papanicolaou Test
Health Services Needs and Demand
Self Report
Registries
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires
Compliance
Public Health
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program : Challenges for survey methods. / Rossi, Paolo Giorgi; Esposito, Gennaro; Brezzi, Silvia; Brachini, Angela; Raggi, Patrizio; Federici, Antonio.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 6, 36, 17.03.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rossi, Paolo Giorgi ; Esposito, Gennaro ; Brezzi, Silvia ; Brachini, Angela ; Raggi, Patrizio ; Federici, Antonio. / Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program : Challenges for survey methods. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2006 ; Vol. 6.
@article{65a06a3f59e643ea97a466c97a317fc7,
title = "Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program: Challenges for survey methods",
abstract = "Background: The cytological screening programme of Viterbo has completed the second round of invitations to the entire target population (age 25-64). From a public health perspective, it is important to know the Pap-test coverage rate and the use of opportunistic screening. The most commonly used study design is the survey, but the validity of self-reports and the assumptions made about non respondents are often questioned. Methods: From the target population, 940 women were sampled, and responded to a telephone interview about Pap-test utilisation. The answers were compared with the screening program registry; comparing the dates of Pap-tests reported by both sources. Sensitivity analyses were performed for coverage over a 36-month period, according to various assumptions regarding non respondents. Results: The response rate was 68{\%}. The coverage over 36 months was 86.4{\%} if we assume that non respondents had the same coverage as respondents, 66{\%} if we assume they were not covered at all, and 74.6{\%} if we adjust for screening compliance in the non respondents. The sensitivity and specificity of the question, {"}have you ever had a Pap test with the screening programme{"} were 84.5{\%} and 82.2{\%} respectively. The test dates reported in the interview tended to be more recent than those reported in the registry, but 68{\%} were within 12 months of each other. Conclusion: Surveys are useful tools to understand the effectiveness of a screening programme and women's self-report was sufficiently reliable in our setting, but the coverage estimates were strongly influenced by the assumptions we made regarding non respondents.",
author = "Rossi, {Paolo Giorgi} and Gennaro Esposito and Silvia Brezzi and Angela Brachini and Patrizio Raggi and Antonio Federici",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-6-36",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program

T2 - Challenges for survey methods

AU - Rossi, Paolo Giorgi

AU - Esposito, Gennaro

AU - Brezzi, Silvia

AU - Brachini, Angela

AU - Raggi, Patrizio

AU - Federici, Antonio

PY - 2006/3/17

Y1 - 2006/3/17

N2 - Background: The cytological screening programme of Viterbo has completed the second round of invitations to the entire target population (age 25-64). From a public health perspective, it is important to know the Pap-test coverage rate and the use of opportunistic screening. The most commonly used study design is the survey, but the validity of self-reports and the assumptions made about non respondents are often questioned. Methods: From the target population, 940 women were sampled, and responded to a telephone interview about Pap-test utilisation. The answers were compared with the screening program registry; comparing the dates of Pap-tests reported by both sources. Sensitivity analyses were performed for coverage over a 36-month period, according to various assumptions regarding non respondents. Results: The response rate was 68%. The coverage over 36 months was 86.4% if we assume that non respondents had the same coverage as respondents, 66% if we assume they were not covered at all, and 74.6% if we adjust for screening compliance in the non respondents. The sensitivity and specificity of the question, "have you ever had a Pap test with the screening programme" were 84.5% and 82.2% respectively. The test dates reported in the interview tended to be more recent than those reported in the registry, but 68% were within 12 months of each other. Conclusion: Surveys are useful tools to understand the effectiveness of a screening programme and women's self-report was sufficiently reliable in our setting, but the coverage estimates were strongly influenced by the assumptions we made regarding non respondents.

AB - Background: The cytological screening programme of Viterbo has completed the second round of invitations to the entire target population (age 25-64). From a public health perspective, it is important to know the Pap-test coverage rate and the use of opportunistic screening. The most commonly used study design is the survey, but the validity of self-reports and the assumptions made about non respondents are often questioned. Methods: From the target population, 940 women were sampled, and responded to a telephone interview about Pap-test utilisation. The answers were compared with the screening program registry; comparing the dates of Pap-tests reported by both sources. Sensitivity analyses were performed for coverage over a 36-month period, according to various assumptions regarding non respondents. Results: The response rate was 68%. The coverage over 36 months was 86.4% if we assume that non respondents had the same coverage as respondents, 66% if we assume they were not covered at all, and 74.6% if we adjust for screening compliance in the non respondents. The sensitivity and specificity of the question, "have you ever had a Pap test with the screening programme" were 84.5% and 82.2% respectively. The test dates reported in the interview tended to be more recent than those reported in the registry, but 68% were within 12 months of each other. Conclusion: Surveys are useful tools to understand the effectiveness of a screening programme and women's self-report was sufficiently reliable in our setting, but the coverage estimates were strongly influenced by the assumptions we made regarding non respondents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645834588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645834588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-6-36

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-6-36

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645834588

VL - 6

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

M1 - 36

ER -