Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program: challenges for survey methods

Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Gennaro Esposito, Silvia Brezzi, Angela Brachini, Patrizio Raggi, Antonio Federici

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cytological screening programme of Viterbo has completed the second round of invitations to the entire target population (age 25-64). From a public health perspective, it is important to know the Pap-test coverage rate and the use of opportunistic screening. The most commonly used study design is the survey, but the validity of self-reports and the assumptions made about non respondents are often questioned.

METHODS: From the target population, 940 women were sampled, and responded to a telephone interview about Pap-test utilisation. The answers were compared with the screening program registry; comparing the dates of Pap-tests reported by both sources. Sensitivity analyses were performed for coverage over a 36-month period, according to various assumptions regarding non respondents.

RESULTS: The response rate was 68%. The coverage over 36 months was 86.4% if we assume that non respondents had the same coverage as respondents, 66% if we assume they were not covered at all, and 74.6% if we adjust for screening compliance in the non respondents. The sensitivity and specificity of the question, "have you ever had a Pap test with the screening programme" were 84.5% and 82.2% respectively. The test dates reported in the interview tended to be more recent than those reported in the registry, but 68% were within 12 months of each other.

CONCLUSION: Surveys are useful tools to understand the effectiveness of a screening programme and women's self-report was sufficiently reliable in our setting, but the coverage estimates were strongly influenced by the assumptions we made regarding non respondents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36
Number of pages1
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Papanicolaou Test
Health Services Needs and Demand
Self Report
Registries
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires
Compliance
Public Health
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program : challenges for survey methods. / Giorgi Rossi, Paolo; Esposito, Gennaro; Brezzi, Silvia; Brachini, Angela; Raggi, Patrizio; Federici, Antonio.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 6, 2006, p. 36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giorgi Rossi, Paolo ; Esposito, Gennaro ; Brezzi, Silvia ; Brachini, Angela ; Raggi, Patrizio ; Federici, Antonio. / Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program : challenges for survey methods. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2006 ; Vol. 6. pp. 36.
@article{c1ad4f2cf0cf4f93b9db4e818228cfc3,
title = "Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program: challenges for survey methods",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The cytological screening programme of Viterbo has completed the second round of invitations to the entire target population (age 25-64). From a public health perspective, it is important to know the Pap-test coverage rate and the use of opportunistic screening. The most commonly used study design is the survey, but the validity of self-reports and the assumptions made about non respondents are often questioned.METHODS: From the target population, 940 women were sampled, and responded to a telephone interview about Pap-test utilisation. The answers were compared with the screening program registry; comparing the dates of Pap-tests reported by both sources. Sensitivity analyses were performed for coverage over a 36-month period, according to various assumptions regarding non respondents.RESULTS: The response rate was 68{\%}. The coverage over 36 months was 86.4{\%} if we assume that non respondents had the same coverage as respondents, 66{\%} if we assume they were not covered at all, and 74.6{\%} if we adjust for screening compliance in the non respondents. The sensitivity and specificity of the question, {"}have you ever had a Pap test with the screening programme{"} were 84.5{\%} and 82.2{\%} respectively. The test dates reported in the interview tended to be more recent than those reported in the registry, but 68{\%} were within 12 months of each other.CONCLUSION: Surveys are useful tools to understand the effectiveness of a screening programme and women's self-report was sufficiently reliable in our setting, but the coverage estimates were strongly influenced by the assumptions we made regarding non respondents.",
author = "{Giorgi Rossi}, Paolo and Gennaro Esposito and Silvia Brezzi and Angela Brachini and Patrizio Raggi and Antonio Federici",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "36",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program

T2 - challenges for survey methods

AU - Giorgi Rossi, Paolo

AU - Esposito, Gennaro

AU - Brezzi, Silvia

AU - Brachini, Angela

AU - Raggi, Patrizio

AU - Federici, Antonio

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - BACKGROUND: The cytological screening programme of Viterbo has completed the second round of invitations to the entire target population (age 25-64). From a public health perspective, it is important to know the Pap-test coverage rate and the use of opportunistic screening. The most commonly used study design is the survey, but the validity of self-reports and the assumptions made about non respondents are often questioned.METHODS: From the target population, 940 women were sampled, and responded to a telephone interview about Pap-test utilisation. The answers were compared with the screening program registry; comparing the dates of Pap-tests reported by both sources. Sensitivity analyses were performed for coverage over a 36-month period, according to various assumptions regarding non respondents.RESULTS: The response rate was 68%. The coverage over 36 months was 86.4% if we assume that non respondents had the same coverage as respondents, 66% if we assume they were not covered at all, and 74.6% if we adjust for screening compliance in the non respondents. The sensitivity and specificity of the question, "have you ever had a Pap test with the screening programme" were 84.5% and 82.2% respectively. The test dates reported in the interview tended to be more recent than those reported in the registry, but 68% were within 12 months of each other.CONCLUSION: Surveys are useful tools to understand the effectiveness of a screening programme and women's self-report was sufficiently reliable in our setting, but the coverage estimates were strongly influenced by the assumptions we made regarding non respondents.

AB - BACKGROUND: The cytological screening programme of Viterbo has completed the second round of invitations to the entire target population (age 25-64). From a public health perspective, it is important to know the Pap-test coverage rate and the use of opportunistic screening. The most commonly used study design is the survey, but the validity of self-reports and the assumptions made about non respondents are often questioned.METHODS: From the target population, 940 women were sampled, and responded to a telephone interview about Pap-test utilisation. The answers were compared with the screening program registry; comparing the dates of Pap-tests reported by both sources. Sensitivity analyses were performed for coverage over a 36-month period, according to various assumptions regarding non respondents.RESULTS: The response rate was 68%. The coverage over 36 months was 86.4% if we assume that non respondents had the same coverage as respondents, 66% if we assume they were not covered at all, and 74.6% if we adjust for screening compliance in the non respondents. The sensitivity and specificity of the question, "have you ever had a Pap test with the screening programme" were 84.5% and 82.2% respectively. The test dates reported in the interview tended to be more recent than those reported in the registry, but 68% were within 12 months of each other.CONCLUSION: Surveys are useful tools to understand the effectiveness of a screening programme and women's self-report was sufficiently reliable in our setting, but the coverage estimates were strongly influenced by the assumptions we made regarding non respondents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751529220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751529220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16545125

VL - 6

SP - 36

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

ER -