Estimation of particle mass concentration in ambient air using a particle counter

A. Tittarelli, A. Borgini, M. Bertoldi, E. De Saeger, A. Ruprecht, R. Stefanoni, G. Tagliabue, P. Contiero, P. Crosignani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Particle count may have advantage over particle mass concentration for assessing the health effects of airborne particulate matter. However, health effects have mainly been investigated with mass-measuring instruments, so it is important to assess relationships between the variability of particle number, as determined by an optical particle counter, and the variability of particle mass as measured by traditional mass-measuring instruments. We used a light scattering particle counter to monitor the concentration of particulate matter in ambient air in a northern Italian city continuously from August 2005 to July 2006. Six channels were calibrated to count particles in the size range 0.3-10 μm and above. Particles under 0.3 μm cannot be detected by the instrument. The particle counter was placed alongside the mass-measuring instruments of the Environmental Protection Agency of the Region of Piemonte (ARPA). Particle numbers were transformed into masses and compared with PM10 and PM2.5 data obtained from the ARPA instruments. Daily average values were compared. The correlation between the two methods was good for both PM10 (R2 = 0.734) and PM2.5 (R2 = 0.856); differences between means were significant only for PM2.5. These findings suggest that a light scattering particle counter might be suitable for assessing particulate matter variability in epidemiological studies on effects of air pollution, though further investigations are necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8543-8548
Number of pages6
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Volume42
Issue number36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

ambient air
particulate matter
light scattering
particle
range size
atmospheric pollution

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Particle counter
  • PM
  • Size distribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Tittarelli, A., Borgini, A., Bertoldi, M., De Saeger, E., Ruprecht, A., Stefanoni, R., ... Crosignani, P. (2008). Estimation of particle mass concentration in ambient air using a particle counter. Atmospheric Environment, 42(36), 8543-8548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.056

Estimation of particle mass concentration in ambient air using a particle counter. / Tittarelli, A.; Borgini, A.; Bertoldi, M.; De Saeger, E.; Ruprecht, A.; Stefanoni, R.; Tagliabue, G.; Contiero, P.; Crosignani, P.

In: Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 42, No. 36, 11.2008, p. 8543-8548.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tittarelli, A, Borgini, A, Bertoldi, M, De Saeger, E, Ruprecht, A, Stefanoni, R, Tagliabue, G, Contiero, P & Crosignani, P 2008, 'Estimation of particle mass concentration in ambient air using a particle counter', Atmospheric Environment, vol. 42, no. 36, pp. 8543-8548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.056
Tittarelli A, Borgini A, Bertoldi M, De Saeger E, Ruprecht A, Stefanoni R et al. Estimation of particle mass concentration in ambient air using a particle counter. Atmospheric Environment. 2008 Nov;42(36):8543-8548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.056
Tittarelli, A. ; Borgini, A. ; Bertoldi, M. ; De Saeger, E. ; Ruprecht, A. ; Stefanoni, R. ; Tagliabue, G. ; Contiero, P. ; Crosignani, P. / Estimation of particle mass concentration in ambient air using a particle counter. In: Atmospheric Environment. 2008 ; Vol. 42, No. 36. pp. 8543-8548.
@article{6a600b2fce5c4dbfbff75749303255b9,
title = "Estimation of particle mass concentration in ambient air using a particle counter",
abstract = "Particle count may have advantage over particle mass concentration for assessing the health effects of airborne particulate matter. However, health effects have mainly been investigated with mass-measuring instruments, so it is important to assess relationships between the variability of particle number, as determined by an optical particle counter, and the variability of particle mass as measured by traditional mass-measuring instruments. We used a light scattering particle counter to monitor the concentration of particulate matter in ambient air in a northern Italian city continuously from August 2005 to July 2006. Six channels were calibrated to count particles in the size range 0.3-10 μm and above. Particles under 0.3 μm cannot be detected by the instrument. The particle counter was placed alongside the mass-measuring instruments of the Environmental Protection Agency of the Region of Piemonte (ARPA). Particle numbers were transformed into masses and compared with PM10 and PM2.5 data obtained from the ARPA instruments. Daily average values were compared. The correlation between the two methods was good for both PM10 (R2 = 0.734) and PM2.5 (R2 = 0.856); differences between means were significant only for PM2.5. These findings suggest that a light scattering particle counter might be suitable for assessing particulate matter variability in epidemiological studies on effects of air pollution, though further investigations are necessary.",
keywords = "Air pollution, Particle counter, PM, Size distribution",
author = "A. Tittarelli and A. Borgini and M. Bertoldi and {De Saeger}, E. and A. Ruprecht and R. Stefanoni and G. Tagliabue and P. Contiero and P. Crosignani",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.056",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "8543--8548",
journal = "Atmospheric Environment",
issn = "1352-2310",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "36",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation of particle mass concentration in ambient air using a particle counter

AU - Tittarelli, A.

AU - Borgini, A.

AU - Bertoldi, M.

AU - De Saeger, E.

AU - Ruprecht, A.

AU - Stefanoni, R.

AU - Tagliabue, G.

AU - Contiero, P.

AU - Crosignani, P.

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Particle count may have advantage over particle mass concentration for assessing the health effects of airborne particulate matter. However, health effects have mainly been investigated with mass-measuring instruments, so it is important to assess relationships between the variability of particle number, as determined by an optical particle counter, and the variability of particle mass as measured by traditional mass-measuring instruments. We used a light scattering particle counter to monitor the concentration of particulate matter in ambient air in a northern Italian city continuously from August 2005 to July 2006. Six channels were calibrated to count particles in the size range 0.3-10 μm and above. Particles under 0.3 μm cannot be detected by the instrument. The particle counter was placed alongside the mass-measuring instruments of the Environmental Protection Agency of the Region of Piemonte (ARPA). Particle numbers were transformed into masses and compared with PM10 and PM2.5 data obtained from the ARPA instruments. Daily average values were compared. The correlation between the two methods was good for both PM10 (R2 = 0.734) and PM2.5 (R2 = 0.856); differences between means were significant only for PM2.5. These findings suggest that a light scattering particle counter might be suitable for assessing particulate matter variability in epidemiological studies on effects of air pollution, though further investigations are necessary.

AB - Particle count may have advantage over particle mass concentration for assessing the health effects of airborne particulate matter. However, health effects have mainly been investigated with mass-measuring instruments, so it is important to assess relationships between the variability of particle number, as determined by an optical particle counter, and the variability of particle mass as measured by traditional mass-measuring instruments. We used a light scattering particle counter to monitor the concentration of particulate matter in ambient air in a northern Italian city continuously from August 2005 to July 2006. Six channels were calibrated to count particles in the size range 0.3-10 μm and above. Particles under 0.3 μm cannot be detected by the instrument. The particle counter was placed alongside the mass-measuring instruments of the Environmental Protection Agency of the Region of Piemonte (ARPA). Particle numbers were transformed into masses and compared with PM10 and PM2.5 data obtained from the ARPA instruments. Daily average values were compared. The correlation between the two methods was good for both PM10 (R2 = 0.734) and PM2.5 (R2 = 0.856); differences between means were significant only for PM2.5. These findings suggest that a light scattering particle counter might be suitable for assessing particulate matter variability in epidemiological studies on effects of air pollution, though further investigations are necessary.

KW - Air pollution

KW - Particle counter

KW - PM

KW - Size distribution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54349110776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54349110776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.056

DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.056

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:54349110776

VL - 42

SP - 8543

EP - 8548

JO - Atmospheric Environment

JF - Atmospheric Environment

SN - 1352-2310

IS - 36

ER -