Ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergency from the Medical Emergency Team's perspective: A national survey

Luca Cabrini, Alberto Michele Giannini, Margherita Pintaudi, Federico Semeraro, G. Radeschi, Sara Borga, Giovanni Landoni, Herbert Troiano, Marco Luchetti, Thomas Pellis, Giuseppe Ristagno, Giulio Minoja, Davide Mazzon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical Emergency Teams (METs) are frequently involved in ethical issues associated to in-hospital emergencies, like decisions about end-of-life care and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. MET involvement offers both advantages and disadvantages, especially when an immediate decision must be made. We performed a survey among Italian intensivists/anesthesiologists evaluating MET's perspective on the most relevant ethical aspects faced in daily practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed on behalf of the Italian scientific society of anesthesia and intensive care (SIAARTI ) and administered to its members. Decision making criteria applied by respondents when dealing with ethical aspects, the estimated incidence of conflicts due to ethical issues and the impact on the respondents' emotional and moral distress were explored. RESULTS : The questionnaire was completed by 327 intensivists/anesthesiologists. Patient life-expectancy, wishes, and the quality of life were the factors most considered for decisions. Conflicts with ward physicians were reported by most respondents; disagreement on appropriateness of ICU admission and family unpreparedness to the imminent patient death were the most frequent reasons. Half of respondents considered that in case of conflicts the final decision should be made by the MET. Conflicts were generally recognized as causing increased and moral distress within the MET members. Few respondents reported that dedicated protocols or training were locally available. CONCLUSION: Italian intensivists/anesthesiologists reported that ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergencies are occurring commonly and are having a significant negative impact on MET well-being. Conflicts with ward physicians happen frequently. They also conveyed that hospitals don't offer ethics training and have no protocols in place to address ethical issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-57
Number of pages8
JournalMinerva Anestesiologica
Volume82
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Hospital Rapid Response Team
Ethics
Emergencies
Intensive Care Units
Physicians
Terminal Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
Critical Care
Life Expectancy
Decision Making
Anesthesia
Quality of Life
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Hospital rapid response team
  • Terminal care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Cabrini, L., Giannini, A. M., Pintaudi, M., Semeraro, F., Radeschi, G., Borga, S., ... Mazzon, D. (2016). Ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergency from the Medical Emergency Team's perspective: A national survey. Minerva Anestesiologica, 82(1), 50-57.

Ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergency from the Medical Emergency Team's perspective : A national survey. / Cabrini, Luca; Giannini, Alberto Michele; Pintaudi, Margherita; Semeraro, Federico; Radeschi, G.; Borga, Sara; Landoni, Giovanni; Troiano, Herbert; Luchetti, Marco; Pellis, Thomas; Ristagno, Giuseppe; Minoja, Giulio; Mazzon, Davide.

In: Minerva Anestesiologica, Vol. 82, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 50-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cabrini, L, Giannini, AM, Pintaudi, M, Semeraro, F, Radeschi, G, Borga, S, Landoni, G, Troiano, H, Luchetti, M, Pellis, T, Ristagno, G, Minoja, G & Mazzon, D 2016, 'Ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergency from the Medical Emergency Team's perspective: A national survey', Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 50-57.
Cabrini, Luca ; Giannini, Alberto Michele ; Pintaudi, Margherita ; Semeraro, Federico ; Radeschi, G. ; Borga, Sara ; Landoni, Giovanni ; Troiano, Herbert ; Luchetti, Marco ; Pellis, Thomas ; Ristagno, Giuseppe ; Minoja, Giulio ; Mazzon, Davide. / Ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergency from the Medical Emergency Team's perspective : A national survey. In: Minerva Anestesiologica. 2016 ; Vol. 82, No. 1. pp. 50-57.
@article{f7fb475ec3de45168c9f322956969399,
title = "Ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergency from the Medical Emergency Team's perspective: A national survey",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Medical Emergency Teams (METs) are frequently involved in ethical issues associated to in-hospital emergencies, like decisions about end-of-life care and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. MET involvement offers both advantages and disadvantages, especially when an immediate decision must be made. We performed a survey among Italian intensivists/anesthesiologists evaluating MET's perspective on the most relevant ethical aspects faced in daily practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed on behalf of the Italian scientific society of anesthesia and intensive care (SIAARTI ) and administered to its members. Decision making criteria applied by respondents when dealing with ethical aspects, the estimated incidence of conflicts due to ethical issues and the impact on the respondents' emotional and moral distress were explored. RESULTS : The questionnaire was completed by 327 intensivists/anesthesiologists. Patient life-expectancy, wishes, and the quality of life were the factors most considered for decisions. Conflicts with ward physicians were reported by most respondents; disagreement on appropriateness of ICU admission and family unpreparedness to the imminent patient death were the most frequent reasons. Half of respondents considered that in case of conflicts the final decision should be made by the MET. Conflicts were generally recognized as causing increased and moral distress within the MET members. Few respondents reported that dedicated protocols or training were locally available. CONCLUSION: Italian intensivists/anesthesiologists reported that ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergencies are occurring commonly and are having a significant negative impact on MET well-being. Conflicts with ward physicians happen frequently. They also conveyed that hospitals don't offer ethics training and have no protocols in place to address ethical issues.",
keywords = "Ethics, Hospital rapid response team, Terminal care",
author = "Luca Cabrini and Giannini, {Alberto Michele} and Margherita Pintaudi and Federico Semeraro and G. Radeschi and Sara Borga and Giovanni Landoni and Herbert Troiano and Marco Luchetti and Thomas Pellis and Giuseppe Ristagno and Giulio Minoja and Davide Mazzon",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "50--57",
journal = "Minerva Anestesiologica",
issn = "0375-9393",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergency from the Medical Emergency Team's perspective

T2 - A national survey

AU - Cabrini, Luca

AU - Giannini, Alberto Michele

AU - Pintaudi, Margherita

AU - Semeraro, Federico

AU - Radeschi, G.

AU - Borga, Sara

AU - Landoni, Giovanni

AU - Troiano, Herbert

AU - Luchetti, Marco

AU - Pellis, Thomas

AU - Ristagno, Giuseppe

AU - Minoja, Giulio

AU - Mazzon, Davide

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Medical Emergency Teams (METs) are frequently involved in ethical issues associated to in-hospital emergencies, like decisions about end-of-life care and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. MET involvement offers both advantages and disadvantages, especially when an immediate decision must be made. We performed a survey among Italian intensivists/anesthesiologists evaluating MET's perspective on the most relevant ethical aspects faced in daily practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed on behalf of the Italian scientific society of anesthesia and intensive care (SIAARTI ) and administered to its members. Decision making criteria applied by respondents when dealing with ethical aspects, the estimated incidence of conflicts due to ethical issues and the impact on the respondents' emotional and moral distress were explored. RESULTS : The questionnaire was completed by 327 intensivists/anesthesiologists. Patient life-expectancy, wishes, and the quality of life were the factors most considered for decisions. Conflicts with ward physicians were reported by most respondents; disagreement on appropriateness of ICU admission and family unpreparedness to the imminent patient death were the most frequent reasons. Half of respondents considered that in case of conflicts the final decision should be made by the MET. Conflicts were generally recognized as causing increased and moral distress within the MET members. Few respondents reported that dedicated protocols or training were locally available. CONCLUSION: Italian intensivists/anesthesiologists reported that ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergencies are occurring commonly and are having a significant negative impact on MET well-being. Conflicts with ward physicians happen frequently. They also conveyed that hospitals don't offer ethics training and have no protocols in place to address ethical issues.

AB - BACKGROUND: Medical Emergency Teams (METs) are frequently involved in ethical issues associated to in-hospital emergencies, like decisions about end-of-life care and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. MET involvement offers both advantages and disadvantages, especially when an immediate decision must be made. We performed a survey among Italian intensivists/anesthesiologists evaluating MET's perspective on the most relevant ethical aspects faced in daily practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed on behalf of the Italian scientific society of anesthesia and intensive care (SIAARTI ) and administered to its members. Decision making criteria applied by respondents when dealing with ethical aspects, the estimated incidence of conflicts due to ethical issues and the impact on the respondents' emotional and moral distress were explored. RESULTS : The questionnaire was completed by 327 intensivists/anesthesiologists. Patient life-expectancy, wishes, and the quality of life were the factors most considered for decisions. Conflicts with ward physicians were reported by most respondents; disagreement on appropriateness of ICU admission and family unpreparedness to the imminent patient death were the most frequent reasons. Half of respondents considered that in case of conflicts the final decision should be made by the MET. Conflicts were generally recognized as causing increased and moral distress within the MET members. Few respondents reported that dedicated protocols or training were locally available. CONCLUSION: Italian intensivists/anesthesiologists reported that ethical issues associated with in-hospital emergencies are occurring commonly and are having a significant negative impact on MET well-being. Conflicts with ward physicians happen frequently. They also conveyed that hospitals don't offer ethics training and have no protocols in place to address ethical issues.

KW - Ethics

KW - Hospital rapid response team

KW - Terminal care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957990123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957990123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 50

EP - 57

JO - Minerva Anestesiologica

JF - Minerva Anestesiologica

SN - 0375-9393

IS - 1

ER -