Evaluating ambulatory urodynamics: A prospective study in asymptomatic women

Stefano Salvatore, Vik Khullar, Linda Cardozo, Kate Anders, Gaia Zocchi, Marco Soligo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To identify abnormal detrusor contractions in asymptomatic women undergoing ambulatory urodynamics, to standardise the investigation technique for women with urinary symptoms for clinical practice. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Two tertiary referral urogynaecology units: one in London, UK and one in Varese, Italy. Methods: Women without urinary symptoms were recruited into the study. Ambulatory urodynamics was performed according to the King's College Hospital protocol. All the traces were analysed in four different ways: 1. without the second bladder transducer measurements displayed on the screen and without the diary; 2. as in 1. but with the diary; 3. with the second bladder sensor displayed on the screen but without the diary; 4. as in 3. but with the diary. The diary was always interpreted at the end of the test with the woman present. For each method we reported the total number of detrusor contractions and whether the woman would have been diagnosed as having abnormal detrusor contraction. Cochran's Q test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-six women (mean age 31.7 years) were recruited. Ambulatory urodynamic testing lasted an average of 3.57 hour. The diagnosis of abnormal detrusor contraction varied by 65.4% depending on the method of analysis used. The diary and the women's symptoms during the test were the most discriminating factors. A significant difference between the diagnoses was obtained when comparing the four different ways of analysis. According to our protocol only three women (11.5%) had abnormal detrusor contractions. Conclusions: Using our protocol almost 90% of asymptomatic women have a stable bladder on ambulatory urodynamics. This is similar to the results of labouratory urodynamic testing of asymptomatic women but is in contrast to previous reports of ambulatory urodynamics of asymptomatic women. The technique used during ambulatory urodynamics determines the tests ability to detect detrusor instability with an accurate symptom diary being the most important.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-111
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume108
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Urodynamics
Prospective Studies
Urinary Bladder
Transducers
Italy
Observational Studies
Referral and Consultation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Evaluating ambulatory urodynamics : A prospective study in asymptomatic women. / Salvatore, Stefano; Khullar, Vik; Cardozo, Linda; Anders, Kate; Zocchi, Gaia; Soligo, Marco.

In: British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2001, p. 107-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Salvatore, Stefano ; Khullar, Vik ; Cardozo, Linda ; Anders, Kate ; Zocchi, Gaia ; Soligo, Marco. / Evaluating ambulatory urodynamics : A prospective study in asymptomatic women. In: British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2001 ; Vol. 108, No. 1. pp. 107-111.
@article{62b3bc6e23184d89abe925d6c9e96b2e,
title = "Evaluating ambulatory urodynamics: A prospective study in asymptomatic women",
abstract = "Objective: To identify abnormal detrusor contractions in asymptomatic women undergoing ambulatory urodynamics, to standardise the investigation technique for women with urinary symptoms for clinical practice. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Two tertiary referral urogynaecology units: one in London, UK and one in Varese, Italy. Methods: Women without urinary symptoms were recruited into the study. Ambulatory urodynamics was performed according to the King's College Hospital protocol. All the traces were analysed in four different ways: 1. without the second bladder transducer measurements displayed on the screen and without the diary; 2. as in 1. but with the diary; 3. with the second bladder sensor displayed on the screen but without the diary; 4. as in 3. but with the diary. The diary was always interpreted at the end of the test with the woman present. For each method we reported the total number of detrusor contractions and whether the woman would have been diagnosed as having abnormal detrusor contraction. Cochran's Q test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-six women (mean age 31.7 years) were recruited. Ambulatory urodynamic testing lasted an average of 3.57 hour. The diagnosis of abnormal detrusor contraction varied by 65.4{\%} depending on the method of analysis used. The diary and the women's symptoms during the test were the most discriminating factors. A significant difference between the diagnoses was obtained when comparing the four different ways of analysis. According to our protocol only three women (11.5{\%}) had abnormal detrusor contractions. Conclusions: Using our protocol almost 90{\%} of asymptomatic women have a stable bladder on ambulatory urodynamics. This is similar to the results of labouratory urodynamic testing of asymptomatic women but is in contrast to previous reports of ambulatory urodynamics of asymptomatic women. The technique used during ambulatory urodynamics determines the tests ability to detect detrusor instability with an accurate symptom diary being the most important.",
author = "Stefano Salvatore and Vik Khullar and Linda Cardozo and Kate Anders and Gaia Zocchi and Marco Soligo",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00015-2",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "107--111",
journal = "British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "0306-5456",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating ambulatory urodynamics

T2 - A prospective study in asymptomatic women

AU - Salvatore, Stefano

AU - Khullar, Vik

AU - Cardozo, Linda

AU - Anders, Kate

AU - Zocchi, Gaia

AU - Soligo, Marco

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: To identify abnormal detrusor contractions in asymptomatic women undergoing ambulatory urodynamics, to standardise the investigation technique for women with urinary symptoms for clinical practice. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Two tertiary referral urogynaecology units: one in London, UK and one in Varese, Italy. Methods: Women without urinary symptoms were recruited into the study. Ambulatory urodynamics was performed according to the King's College Hospital protocol. All the traces were analysed in four different ways: 1. without the second bladder transducer measurements displayed on the screen and without the diary; 2. as in 1. but with the diary; 3. with the second bladder sensor displayed on the screen but without the diary; 4. as in 3. but with the diary. The diary was always interpreted at the end of the test with the woman present. For each method we reported the total number of detrusor contractions and whether the woman would have been diagnosed as having abnormal detrusor contraction. Cochran's Q test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-six women (mean age 31.7 years) were recruited. Ambulatory urodynamic testing lasted an average of 3.57 hour. The diagnosis of abnormal detrusor contraction varied by 65.4% depending on the method of analysis used. The diary and the women's symptoms during the test were the most discriminating factors. A significant difference between the diagnoses was obtained when comparing the four different ways of analysis. According to our protocol only three women (11.5%) had abnormal detrusor contractions. Conclusions: Using our protocol almost 90% of asymptomatic women have a stable bladder on ambulatory urodynamics. This is similar to the results of labouratory urodynamic testing of asymptomatic women but is in contrast to previous reports of ambulatory urodynamics of asymptomatic women. The technique used during ambulatory urodynamics determines the tests ability to detect detrusor instability with an accurate symptom diary being the most important.

AB - Objective: To identify abnormal detrusor contractions in asymptomatic women undergoing ambulatory urodynamics, to standardise the investigation technique for women with urinary symptoms for clinical practice. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Two tertiary referral urogynaecology units: one in London, UK and one in Varese, Italy. Methods: Women without urinary symptoms were recruited into the study. Ambulatory urodynamics was performed according to the King's College Hospital protocol. All the traces were analysed in four different ways: 1. without the second bladder transducer measurements displayed on the screen and without the diary; 2. as in 1. but with the diary; 3. with the second bladder sensor displayed on the screen but without the diary; 4. as in 3. but with the diary. The diary was always interpreted at the end of the test with the woman present. For each method we reported the total number of detrusor contractions and whether the woman would have been diagnosed as having abnormal detrusor contraction. Cochran's Q test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-six women (mean age 31.7 years) were recruited. Ambulatory urodynamic testing lasted an average of 3.57 hour. The diagnosis of abnormal detrusor contraction varied by 65.4% depending on the method of analysis used. The diary and the women's symptoms during the test were the most discriminating factors. A significant difference between the diagnoses was obtained when comparing the four different ways of analysis. According to our protocol only three women (11.5%) had abnormal detrusor contractions. Conclusions: Using our protocol almost 90% of asymptomatic women have a stable bladder on ambulatory urodynamics. This is similar to the results of labouratory urodynamic testing of asymptomatic women but is in contrast to previous reports of ambulatory urodynamics of asymptomatic women. The technique used during ambulatory urodynamics determines the tests ability to detect detrusor instability with an accurate symptom diary being the most important.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035136294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035136294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00015-2

DO - 10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00015-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 11212983

AN - SCOPUS:0035136294

VL - 108

SP - 107

EP - 111

JO - British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 0306-5456

IS - 1

ER -