Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A systematic review

Bianca Bignotti, Alessio Signori, Francesca Valdora, Federica Rossi, Massimo Calabrese, Manuela Durando, Giovanna Mariscotto, Alberto Tagliafico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To perform a systematic review of the methods used for background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) evaluation on breast MRI. Methods: Studies dealing with BPE assessment on breast MRI were retrieved from major medical libraries independently by four reviewers up to 6October 2015. The keywords used for database searching are "background parenchymal enhancement", "parenchymal enhancement", "MRI" and "breast". The studies were included if qualitative and/or quantitative methods for BPE assessment were described. Results: Of the 420 studies identified, a total of 52 articles were included in the systematic review. 28 studies performed only a qualitative assessment of BPE, 13 studies performed only a quantitative assessment and 11 studies performed both qualitative and quantitative assessments. A wide heterogeneity was found in the MRI sequences and in the quantitative methods used for BPE assessment. Conclusion: A wide variability exists in the quantitative evaluation of BPE on breast MRI. More studies focused on a reliable and comparable method for quantitative BPE assessment are needed. Advances in knowledge: More studies focused on a quantitative BPE assessment are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20160542
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Dec 7 2016

Fingerprint

Breast
Medical Libraries
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI : A systematic review. / Bignotti, Bianca; Signori, Alessio; Valdora, Francesca; Rossi, Federica; Calabrese, Massimo; Durando, Manuela; Mariscotto, Giovanna; Tagliafico, Alberto.

In: British Journal of Radiology, 07.12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bignotti, Bianca ; Signori, Alessio ; Valdora, Francesca ; Rossi, Federica ; Calabrese, Massimo ; Durando, Manuela ; Mariscotto, Giovanna ; Tagliafico, Alberto. / Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI : A systematic review. In: British Journal of Radiology. 2016.
@article{28571c335e2f4de9ada4237c9f9b5956,
title = "Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objective: To perform a systematic review of the methods used for background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) evaluation on breast MRI. Methods: Studies dealing with BPE assessment on breast MRI were retrieved from major medical libraries independently by four reviewers up to 6October 2015. The keywords used for database searching are {"}background parenchymal enhancement{"}, {"}parenchymal enhancement{"}, {"}MRI{"} and {"}breast{"}. The studies were included if qualitative and/or quantitative methods for BPE assessment were described. Results: Of the 420 studies identified, a total of 52 articles were included in the systematic review. 28 studies performed only a qualitative assessment of BPE, 13 studies performed only a quantitative assessment and 11 studies performed both qualitative and quantitative assessments. A wide heterogeneity was found in the MRI sequences and in the quantitative methods used for BPE assessment. Conclusion: A wide variability exists in the quantitative evaluation of BPE on breast MRI. More studies focused on a reliable and comparable method for quantitative BPE assessment are needed. Advances in knowledge: More studies focused on a quantitative BPE assessment are needed.",
author = "Bianca Bignotti and Alessio Signori and Francesca Valdora and Federica Rossi and Massimo Calabrese and Manuela Durando and Giovanna Mariscotto and Alberto Tagliafico",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1259/bjr.20160542",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0007-1285",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Bignotti, Bianca

AU - Signori, Alessio

AU - Valdora, Francesca

AU - Rossi, Federica

AU - Calabrese, Massimo

AU - Durando, Manuela

AU - Mariscotto, Giovanna

AU - Tagliafico, Alberto

PY - 2016/12/7

Y1 - 2016/12/7

N2 - Objective: To perform a systematic review of the methods used for background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) evaluation on breast MRI. Methods: Studies dealing with BPE assessment on breast MRI were retrieved from major medical libraries independently by four reviewers up to 6October 2015. The keywords used for database searching are "background parenchymal enhancement", "parenchymal enhancement", "MRI" and "breast". The studies were included if qualitative and/or quantitative methods for BPE assessment were described. Results: Of the 420 studies identified, a total of 52 articles were included in the systematic review. 28 studies performed only a qualitative assessment of BPE, 13 studies performed only a quantitative assessment and 11 studies performed both qualitative and quantitative assessments. A wide heterogeneity was found in the MRI sequences and in the quantitative methods used for BPE assessment. Conclusion: A wide variability exists in the quantitative evaluation of BPE on breast MRI. More studies focused on a reliable and comparable method for quantitative BPE assessment are needed. Advances in knowledge: More studies focused on a quantitative BPE assessment are needed.

AB - Objective: To perform a systematic review of the methods used for background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) evaluation on breast MRI. Methods: Studies dealing with BPE assessment on breast MRI were retrieved from major medical libraries independently by four reviewers up to 6October 2015. The keywords used for database searching are "background parenchymal enhancement", "parenchymal enhancement", "MRI" and "breast". The studies were included if qualitative and/or quantitative methods for BPE assessment were described. Results: Of the 420 studies identified, a total of 52 articles were included in the systematic review. 28 studies performed only a qualitative assessment of BPE, 13 studies performed only a quantitative assessment and 11 studies performed both qualitative and quantitative assessments. A wide heterogeneity was found in the MRI sequences and in the quantitative methods used for BPE assessment. Conclusion: A wide variability exists in the quantitative evaluation of BPE on breast MRI. More studies focused on a reliable and comparable method for quantitative BPE assessment are needed. Advances in knowledge: More studies focused on a quantitative BPE assessment are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011649883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011649883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20160542

DO - 10.1259/bjr.20160542

M3 - Article

C2 - 27925480

AN - SCOPUS:85011649883

JO - British Journal of Radiology

JF - British Journal of Radiology

SN - 0007-1285

M1 - 20160542

ER -