Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment: An in vitro analysis

Nicola Lopomo, Lei Sun, Stefano Zaffagnini, Giovanni Giordano, Marc R. Safran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The hip joint center is a fundamental landmark in the identification of lower limb mechanical axis; errors in its location lead to substantial inaccuracies both in joint reconstruction and in gait analysis. Actually in Computer Aided Surgery functional non-invasive procedures have been tested in identifying this landmark, but an anatomical validation is scarcely discussed. Methods: A navigation system was used to acquire data on eight cadaveric hips. Pivoting functional maneuver and hip joint anatomy were analyzed. Two functional methods - both with and without using the pelvic tracker - were evaluated: specifically a sphere fit method and a transformation techniques. The positions of the estimated centers with respect to the anatomical center of the femoral head, the influence of this deviation on the kinematic assessment and on the identification of femoral mechanical axis were analyzed. Findings: We found that the implemented transformation technique was the most reliable estimation of hip joint center, introducing a - Mean (SD) - difference of 1.6 (2.7) mm from the anatomical center with the pelvic tracker, whereas sphere fit method without it demonstrated the lowest accuracy with 25.2 (18.9) mm of deviation. Otherwise both the methods reported similar accuracy (

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-212
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Hip Joint
Thigh
Computer-Assisted Surgery
Gait
Biomechanical Phenomena
In Vitro Techniques
Hip
Lower Extremity
Anatomy
Joints

Keywords

  • Error propagation
  • Femoral mechanical axis
  • Functional methods
  • Hip joint center
  • Kinematics
  • Navigation system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment : An in vitro analysis. / Lopomo, Nicola; Sun, Lei; Zaffagnini, Stefano; Giordano, Giovanni; Safran, Marc R.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 25, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 206-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lopomo, Nicola ; Sun, Lei ; Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Giordano, Giovanni ; Safran, Marc R. / Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment : An in vitro analysis. In: Clinical Biomechanics. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 206-212.
@article{f88a648088934d219f9fee8640ffbaf6,
title = "Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment: An in vitro analysis",
abstract = "Background: The hip joint center is a fundamental landmark in the identification of lower limb mechanical axis; errors in its location lead to substantial inaccuracies both in joint reconstruction and in gait analysis. Actually in Computer Aided Surgery functional non-invasive procedures have been tested in identifying this landmark, but an anatomical validation is scarcely discussed. Methods: A navigation system was used to acquire data on eight cadaveric hips. Pivoting functional maneuver and hip joint anatomy were analyzed. Two functional methods - both with and without using the pelvic tracker - were evaluated: specifically a sphere fit method and a transformation techniques. The positions of the estimated centers with respect to the anatomical center of the femoral head, the influence of this deviation on the kinematic assessment and on the identification of femoral mechanical axis were analyzed. Findings: We found that the implemented transformation technique was the most reliable estimation of hip joint center, introducing a - Mean (SD) - difference of 1.6 (2.7) mm from the anatomical center with the pelvic tracker, whereas sphere fit method without it demonstrated the lowest accuracy with 25.2 (18.9) mm of deviation. Otherwise both the methods reported similar accuracy (",
keywords = "Error propagation, Femoral mechanical axis, Functional methods, Hip joint center, Kinematics, Navigation system",
author = "Nicola Lopomo and Lei Sun and Stefano Zaffagnini and Giovanni Giordano and Safran, {Marc R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.008",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "206--212",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment

T2 - An in vitro analysis

AU - Lopomo, Nicola

AU - Sun, Lei

AU - Zaffagnini, Stefano

AU - Giordano, Giovanni

AU - Safran, Marc R.

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Background: The hip joint center is a fundamental landmark in the identification of lower limb mechanical axis; errors in its location lead to substantial inaccuracies both in joint reconstruction and in gait analysis. Actually in Computer Aided Surgery functional non-invasive procedures have been tested in identifying this landmark, but an anatomical validation is scarcely discussed. Methods: A navigation system was used to acquire data on eight cadaveric hips. Pivoting functional maneuver and hip joint anatomy were analyzed. Two functional methods - both with and without using the pelvic tracker - were evaluated: specifically a sphere fit method and a transformation techniques. The positions of the estimated centers with respect to the anatomical center of the femoral head, the influence of this deviation on the kinematic assessment and on the identification of femoral mechanical axis were analyzed. Findings: We found that the implemented transformation technique was the most reliable estimation of hip joint center, introducing a - Mean (SD) - difference of 1.6 (2.7) mm from the anatomical center with the pelvic tracker, whereas sphere fit method without it demonstrated the lowest accuracy with 25.2 (18.9) mm of deviation. Otherwise both the methods reported similar accuracy (

AB - Background: The hip joint center is a fundamental landmark in the identification of lower limb mechanical axis; errors in its location lead to substantial inaccuracies both in joint reconstruction and in gait analysis. Actually in Computer Aided Surgery functional non-invasive procedures have been tested in identifying this landmark, but an anatomical validation is scarcely discussed. Methods: A navigation system was used to acquire data on eight cadaveric hips. Pivoting functional maneuver and hip joint anatomy were analyzed. Two functional methods - both with and without using the pelvic tracker - were evaluated: specifically a sphere fit method and a transformation techniques. The positions of the estimated centers with respect to the anatomical center of the femoral head, the influence of this deviation on the kinematic assessment and on the identification of femoral mechanical axis were analyzed. Findings: We found that the implemented transformation technique was the most reliable estimation of hip joint center, introducing a - Mean (SD) - difference of 1.6 (2.7) mm from the anatomical center with the pelvic tracker, whereas sphere fit method without it demonstrated the lowest accuracy with 25.2 (18.9) mm of deviation. Otherwise both the methods reported similar accuracy (

KW - Error propagation

KW - Femoral mechanical axis

KW - Functional methods

KW - Hip joint center

KW - Kinematics

KW - Navigation system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76349108519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76349108519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.008

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 20006913

AN - SCOPUS:76349108519

VL - 25

SP - 206

EP - 212

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

IS - 3

ER -