Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements for glaucoma detection: GDx ECC versus spectral-domain OCT

Francesca Bertuzzi, Eleonora Benatti, Giulia Esempio, Eliana Rulli, Stefano Miglior

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: To assess the ability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained using GDx-enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) or spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue), and that of ganglion cell complex (GCC) scan available on RTVue, to detect glaucoma. METHODS:: One randomly selected eye of 205 subjects (70 normal, 65 ocular hypertension, and 70 glaucoma) underwent a complete clinical and instrumental examination. RTVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was used to assess RNFL thickness and GCC parameters, GDx ECC to assess RNFL thickness. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and sensitivity of the RNFL and GCC parameters were calculated at a fixed specificity of 95%, and the diagnostic abilities of the RNFL values obtained using the 2 instruments were compared. We also compared the results obtained in the normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous subjects. RESULTS:: Best GDx RNFL parameter was nerve fiber indicator (NFI) (AUC 0.99, sensitivity 96%); the best RTVue parameters were average (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 90%), inferior-temporal (AUC 0.97, sensitivity 89%), and superior-temporal RNFL thickness (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%). There were no significant differences between the 2 devices (P>0.05). Best GCC parameters were focal loss volume (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 91%) and global loss volume (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%). CONCLUSIONS:: GDx ECC and RTVue show a very good diagnostic ability to detect glaucoma. Most of the RNFL parameters had high AUCs and sensitivities. The diagnostic validity of GCC was comparable with that of the RNFL parameters, and they may be very useful in detecting RNFL damage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)232-239
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Glaucoma
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Nerve Fibers
Glaucoma
Area Under Curve
Ganglia
Optical Coherence Tomography
Ocular Hypertension
ROC Curve
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Diagnostic ability
  • Morphometric examination in glaucoma
  • Retinal nerve fiber layer
  • Scanning laser polarimetry
  • Spectral-domain OCT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements for glaucoma detection : GDx ECC versus spectral-domain OCT. / Bertuzzi, Francesca; Benatti, Eleonora; Esempio, Giulia; Rulli, Eliana; Miglior, Stefano.

In: Journal of Glaucoma, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2014, p. 232-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bertuzzi, Francesca ; Benatti, Eleonora ; Esempio, Giulia ; Rulli, Eliana ; Miglior, Stefano. / Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements for glaucoma detection : GDx ECC versus spectral-domain OCT. In: Journal of Glaucoma. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 232-239.
@article{94c20f185c214237a0bc06347cc75d14,
title = "Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements for glaucoma detection: GDx ECC versus spectral-domain OCT",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: To assess the ability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained using GDx-enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) or spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue), and that of ganglion cell complex (GCC) scan available on RTVue, to detect glaucoma. METHODS:: One randomly selected eye of 205 subjects (70 normal, 65 ocular hypertension, and 70 glaucoma) underwent a complete clinical and instrumental examination. RTVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was used to assess RNFL thickness and GCC parameters, GDx ECC to assess RNFL thickness. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and sensitivity of the RNFL and GCC parameters were calculated at a fixed specificity of 95{\%}, and the diagnostic abilities of the RNFL values obtained using the 2 instruments were compared. We also compared the results obtained in the normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous subjects. RESULTS:: Best GDx RNFL parameter was nerve fiber indicator (NFI) (AUC 0.99, sensitivity 96{\%}); the best RTVue parameters were average (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 90{\%}), inferior-temporal (AUC 0.97, sensitivity 89{\%}), and superior-temporal RNFL thickness (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87{\%}). There were no significant differences between the 2 devices (P>0.05). Best GCC parameters were focal loss volume (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 91{\%}) and global loss volume (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87{\%}). CONCLUSIONS:: GDx ECC and RTVue show a very good diagnostic ability to detect glaucoma. Most of the RNFL parameters had high AUCs and sensitivities. The diagnostic validity of GCC was comparable with that of the RNFL parameters, and they may be very useful in detecting RNFL damage.",
keywords = "Diagnostic ability, Morphometric examination in glaucoma, Retinal nerve fiber layer, Scanning laser polarimetry, Spectral-domain OCT",
author = "Francesca Bertuzzi and Eleonora Benatti and Giulia Esempio and Eliana Rulli and Stefano Miglior",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182741afc",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "232--239",
journal = "Journal of Glaucoma",
issn = "1057-0829",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements for glaucoma detection

T2 - GDx ECC versus spectral-domain OCT

AU - Bertuzzi, Francesca

AU - Benatti, Eleonora

AU - Esempio, Giulia

AU - Rulli, Eliana

AU - Miglior, Stefano

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND:: To assess the ability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained using GDx-enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) or spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue), and that of ganglion cell complex (GCC) scan available on RTVue, to detect glaucoma. METHODS:: One randomly selected eye of 205 subjects (70 normal, 65 ocular hypertension, and 70 glaucoma) underwent a complete clinical and instrumental examination. RTVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was used to assess RNFL thickness and GCC parameters, GDx ECC to assess RNFL thickness. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and sensitivity of the RNFL and GCC parameters were calculated at a fixed specificity of 95%, and the diagnostic abilities of the RNFL values obtained using the 2 instruments were compared. We also compared the results obtained in the normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous subjects. RESULTS:: Best GDx RNFL parameter was nerve fiber indicator (NFI) (AUC 0.99, sensitivity 96%); the best RTVue parameters were average (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 90%), inferior-temporal (AUC 0.97, sensitivity 89%), and superior-temporal RNFL thickness (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%). There were no significant differences between the 2 devices (P>0.05). Best GCC parameters were focal loss volume (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 91%) and global loss volume (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%). CONCLUSIONS:: GDx ECC and RTVue show a very good diagnostic ability to detect glaucoma. Most of the RNFL parameters had high AUCs and sensitivities. The diagnostic validity of GCC was comparable with that of the RNFL parameters, and they may be very useful in detecting RNFL damage.

AB - BACKGROUND:: To assess the ability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained using GDx-enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) or spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue), and that of ganglion cell complex (GCC) scan available on RTVue, to detect glaucoma. METHODS:: One randomly selected eye of 205 subjects (70 normal, 65 ocular hypertension, and 70 glaucoma) underwent a complete clinical and instrumental examination. RTVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was used to assess RNFL thickness and GCC parameters, GDx ECC to assess RNFL thickness. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and sensitivity of the RNFL and GCC parameters were calculated at a fixed specificity of 95%, and the diagnostic abilities of the RNFL values obtained using the 2 instruments were compared. We also compared the results obtained in the normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous subjects. RESULTS:: Best GDx RNFL parameter was nerve fiber indicator (NFI) (AUC 0.99, sensitivity 96%); the best RTVue parameters were average (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 90%), inferior-temporal (AUC 0.97, sensitivity 89%), and superior-temporal RNFL thickness (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%). There were no significant differences between the 2 devices (P>0.05). Best GCC parameters were focal loss volume (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 91%) and global loss volume (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%). CONCLUSIONS:: GDx ECC and RTVue show a very good diagnostic ability to detect glaucoma. Most of the RNFL parameters had high AUCs and sensitivities. The diagnostic validity of GCC was comparable with that of the RNFL parameters, and they may be very useful in detecting RNFL damage.

KW - Diagnostic ability

KW - Morphometric examination in glaucoma

KW - Retinal nerve fiber layer

KW - Scanning laser polarimetry

KW - Spectral-domain OCT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897582719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897582719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182741afc

DO - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182741afc

M3 - Article

C2 - 23970337

AN - SCOPUS:84897582719

VL - 23

SP - 232

EP - 239

JO - Journal of Glaucoma

JF - Journal of Glaucoma

SN - 1057-0829

IS - 4

ER -