Evaluation of the sense wear mini armband to assess energy expenditure during pole walking

Gianluca Vernillo, Aldo Savoldelli, Barbara Pellegrini, Federico Schena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study aimed to show the validity of a portable motion sensor, the SenseWear Armband (SWA), for the estimation of energy expenditure during pole walking. Twenty healthy adults (mean ± SD: age 30.1 ± 7.2 year, body mass 66.1 ± 10.6 kg, height 172.4 ± 8.0 cm, BMI 22.1 ± 2.4 kg.m-2) wore the armband during randomized pole walking activities at a constant speed (1.25 m.s-1) and at seven grades (0%, ±5%, ±15% and ±25%). Estimates of total energy expenditure from the armband were compared with values derived from indirect calorimetry methodology (IC) using a 2-way mixed model ANOVA (Device × Slope), correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Results revealed significant main effects for device, and slope (p <.025) as well as a significant interaction (p <.001). Significant differences between IC and SWA were observed for all conditions (p <.05). SWA generally underestimate the EE values during uphill PW by 0.04 kcal.kg-1.min-1 (p <.05). Whereas, a significant overestimation has been detected during flat and downhill PW by 0.01 and 0.03 kcal.kg-1.min-1 (p <.05), respectively. The Bland-Altman plots revealed bias of the armband compared with the indirect calorimetry at any condition examined. The present data suggest that the armband is not accurate to correctly detect and estimate the energy expenditure during pole walking activities. Therefore, the observed over- and under-estimations warrants more work to improve the ability of SWA to accurately measure EE for these activities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)565-569
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Indirect Calorimetry
Energy Metabolism
Walking
Equipment and Supplies
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • Accelerometer
  • Activity monitor
  • Energy expenditure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of the sense wear mini armband to assess energy expenditure during pole walking. / Vernillo, Gianluca; Savoldelli, Aldo; Pellegrini, Barbara; Schena, Federico.

In: International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.10.2014, p. 565-569.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bdcc4fdb2746452e9bde4865b9b36bfa,
title = "Evaluation of the sense wear mini armband to assess energy expenditure during pole walking",
abstract = "The current study aimed to show the validity of a portable motion sensor, the SenseWear Armband (SWA), for the estimation of energy expenditure during pole walking. Twenty healthy adults (mean ± SD: age 30.1 ± 7.2 year, body mass 66.1 ± 10.6 kg, height 172.4 ± 8.0 cm, BMI 22.1 ± 2.4 kg.m-2) wore the armband during randomized pole walking activities at a constant speed (1.25 m.s-1) and at seven grades (0{\%}, ±5{\%}, ±15{\%} and ±25{\%}). Estimates of total energy expenditure from the armband were compared with values derived from indirect calorimetry methodology (IC) using a 2-way mixed model ANOVA (Device × Slope), correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Results revealed significant main effects for device, and slope (p <.025) as well as a significant interaction (p <.001). Significant differences between IC and SWA were observed for all conditions (p <.05). SWA generally underestimate the EE values during uphill PW by 0.04 kcal.kg-1.min-1 (p <.05). Whereas, a significant overestimation has been detected during flat and downhill PW by 0.01 and 0.03 kcal.kg-1.min-1 (p <.05), respectively. The Bland-Altman plots revealed bias of the armband compared with the indirect calorimetry at any condition examined. The present data suggest that the armband is not accurate to correctly detect and estimate the energy expenditure during pole walking activities. Therefore, the observed over- and under-estimations warrants more work to improve the ability of SWA to accurately measure EE for these activities.",
keywords = "Accelerometer, Activity monitor, Energy expenditure",
author = "Gianluca Vernillo and Aldo Savoldelli and Barbara Pellegrini and Federico Schena",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0075",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "565--569",
journal = "International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism",
issn = "1526-484X",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the sense wear mini armband to assess energy expenditure during pole walking

AU - Vernillo, Gianluca

AU - Savoldelli, Aldo

AU - Pellegrini, Barbara

AU - Schena, Federico

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - The current study aimed to show the validity of a portable motion sensor, the SenseWear Armband (SWA), for the estimation of energy expenditure during pole walking. Twenty healthy adults (mean ± SD: age 30.1 ± 7.2 year, body mass 66.1 ± 10.6 kg, height 172.4 ± 8.0 cm, BMI 22.1 ± 2.4 kg.m-2) wore the armband during randomized pole walking activities at a constant speed (1.25 m.s-1) and at seven grades (0%, ±5%, ±15% and ±25%). Estimates of total energy expenditure from the armband were compared with values derived from indirect calorimetry methodology (IC) using a 2-way mixed model ANOVA (Device × Slope), correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Results revealed significant main effects for device, and slope (p <.025) as well as a significant interaction (p <.001). Significant differences between IC and SWA were observed for all conditions (p <.05). SWA generally underestimate the EE values during uphill PW by 0.04 kcal.kg-1.min-1 (p <.05). Whereas, a significant overestimation has been detected during flat and downhill PW by 0.01 and 0.03 kcal.kg-1.min-1 (p <.05), respectively. The Bland-Altman plots revealed bias of the armband compared with the indirect calorimetry at any condition examined. The present data suggest that the armband is not accurate to correctly detect and estimate the energy expenditure during pole walking activities. Therefore, the observed over- and under-estimations warrants more work to improve the ability of SWA to accurately measure EE for these activities.

AB - The current study aimed to show the validity of a portable motion sensor, the SenseWear Armband (SWA), for the estimation of energy expenditure during pole walking. Twenty healthy adults (mean ± SD: age 30.1 ± 7.2 year, body mass 66.1 ± 10.6 kg, height 172.4 ± 8.0 cm, BMI 22.1 ± 2.4 kg.m-2) wore the armband during randomized pole walking activities at a constant speed (1.25 m.s-1) and at seven grades (0%, ±5%, ±15% and ±25%). Estimates of total energy expenditure from the armband were compared with values derived from indirect calorimetry methodology (IC) using a 2-way mixed model ANOVA (Device × Slope), correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Results revealed significant main effects for device, and slope (p <.025) as well as a significant interaction (p <.001). Significant differences between IC and SWA were observed for all conditions (p <.05). SWA generally underestimate the EE values during uphill PW by 0.04 kcal.kg-1.min-1 (p <.05). Whereas, a significant overestimation has been detected during flat and downhill PW by 0.01 and 0.03 kcal.kg-1.min-1 (p <.05), respectively. The Bland-Altman plots revealed bias of the armband compared with the indirect calorimetry at any condition examined. The present data suggest that the armband is not accurate to correctly detect and estimate the energy expenditure during pole walking activities. Therefore, the observed over- and under-estimations warrants more work to improve the ability of SWA to accurately measure EE for these activities.

KW - Accelerometer

KW - Activity monitor

KW - Energy expenditure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908163214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908163214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0075

DO - 10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0075

M3 - Article

C2 - 25309985

AN - SCOPUS:84908163214

VL - 24

SP - 565

EP - 569

JO - International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

JF - International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

SN - 1526-484X

IS - 5

ER -