Evidence-based algorithm for diagnosis and assessment in psoriatic arthritis: Results by Italian DELphi in psoriatic arthritis (IDEA)

Giovanni Lapadula, A. Marchesoni, F. Salaffi, R. Ramonda, C. Salvarani, L. Punzi, L. Costa, F. Caso, D. Simone, G. Baiocchi, C. Scioscia, M. Di Carlo, R. Scarpa, G. Ferraccioli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving skin, peripheral joints, entheses, and axial skeleton. The disease is frequently associated with extrarticular manifestations (EAMs) and comorbidities. In order to create a protocol for PsA diagnosis and global assessment of patients with an algorithm based on anamnestic, clinical, laboratory and imaging procedures, we established a DElphi study on a national scale, named Italian DElphi in psoriatic Arthritis (IDEA). After a literature search, a Delphi poll, involving 52 rheumatologists, was performed. On the basis of the literature search, 202 potential items were identified. The steering committee planned at least two Delphi rounds. In the first Delphi round, the experts judged each of the 202 items using a score ranging from 1 to 9 based on its increasing clinical relevance. The questions posed to experts were How relevant is this procedure/observation/sign/symptom for assessment of a psoriatic arthritis patient? Proposals of additional items, not included in the questionnaire, were also encouraged. The results of the poll were discussed by the Steering Committee, which evaluated the necessity for removing selected procedures or adding additional ones, according to criteria of clinical appropriateness and sustainability. A total of 43 recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, recognized as items, were derived by combination of the Delphi survey and two National Expert Meetings, and grouped in different areas. Favourable opinion was reached in 100% of cases for several aspects covering the following areas: medical (familial and personal) history, physical evaluation, imaging tool, second level laboratory tests, disease activity measurement and extrarticular manifestations. After performing PsA diagnosis, identification of specific disease activity scores and clinimetric approaches were suggested for assessing the different clinical subsets. Further, results showed the need for investigation on the presence of several EAMs and risk factors. In the context of any area, a rank was assigned for each item by Expert Committee members, in order to create the logical sequence of the algorithm. The final list of recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, by the Delphi survey and the two National Expert Meetings, was also reported as an algorithm. This study shows results obtained by the combination of a DElphi survey of a group of Italian rheumatologists and two National Expert Meetings, created with the aim of establishing a clinical procedure and algorithm for the diagnosis and the assessment of PsA patients. In order to find accurate and practical diagnostic and assessment items in clinical practice, we have focused our attention on evaluating the different PsA domains. Hence, we conceived the IDEA algorithm in order to address PsA diagnosis and assessment in the context of daily clinical practice. The IDEA algorithm might eventually lead to a multidimensional approach and could represent a useful and practical tool for addressing diagnosis and for assessing the disease appropriately. However, the elaborated algorithm needs to be further investigated in daily practice, for evidencing and proving its eventual efficacy in detecting and staging PsA and its heterogeneous spectrum appropriately.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-136
Number of pages11
JournalReumatismo
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Psoriatic Arthritis
Committee Membership
Delphi Technique
Symptom Assessment
Skeleton
Signs and Symptoms
Comorbidity
Chronic Disease
Joints
History
Observation

Keywords

  • Arthritis
  • Comorbidities
  • Diagnosis algorithm
  • Psoriasis
  • Psoriatic arthritis
  • Rheumatology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Cite this

Evidence-based algorithm for diagnosis and assessment in psoriatic arthritis : Results by Italian DELphi in psoriatic arthritis (IDEA). / Lapadula, Giovanni; Marchesoni, A.; Salaffi, F.; Ramonda, R.; Salvarani, C.; Punzi, L.; Costa, L.; Caso, F.; Simone, D.; Baiocchi, G.; Scioscia, C.; Di Carlo, M.; Scarpa, R.; Ferraccioli, G.

In: Reumatismo, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2016, p. 126-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lapadula, G, Marchesoni, A, Salaffi, F, Ramonda, R, Salvarani, C, Punzi, L, Costa, L, Caso, F, Simone, D, Baiocchi, G, Scioscia, C, Di Carlo, M, Scarpa, R & Ferraccioli, G 2016, 'Evidence-based algorithm for diagnosis and assessment in psoriatic arthritis: Results by Italian DELphi in psoriatic arthritis (IDEA)', Reumatismo, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 126-136. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2016.913
Lapadula, Giovanni ; Marchesoni, A. ; Salaffi, F. ; Ramonda, R. ; Salvarani, C. ; Punzi, L. ; Costa, L. ; Caso, F. ; Simone, D. ; Baiocchi, G. ; Scioscia, C. ; Di Carlo, M. ; Scarpa, R. ; Ferraccioli, G. / Evidence-based algorithm for diagnosis and assessment in psoriatic arthritis : Results by Italian DELphi in psoriatic arthritis (IDEA). In: Reumatismo. 2016 ; Vol. 68, No. 3. pp. 126-136.
@article{76460fc834b94699961f4b426a3beeec,
title = "Evidence-based algorithm for diagnosis and assessment in psoriatic arthritis: Results by Italian DELphi in psoriatic arthritis (IDEA)",
abstract = "Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving skin, peripheral joints, entheses, and axial skeleton. The disease is frequently associated with extrarticular manifestations (EAMs) and comorbidities. In order to create a protocol for PsA diagnosis and global assessment of patients with an algorithm based on anamnestic, clinical, laboratory and imaging procedures, we established a DElphi study on a national scale, named Italian DElphi in psoriatic Arthritis (IDEA). After a literature search, a Delphi poll, involving 52 rheumatologists, was performed. On the basis of the literature search, 202 potential items were identified. The steering committee planned at least two Delphi rounds. In the first Delphi round, the experts judged each of the 202 items using a score ranging from 1 to 9 based on its increasing clinical relevance. The questions posed to experts were How relevant is this procedure/observation/sign/symptom for assessment of a psoriatic arthritis patient? Proposals of additional items, not included in the questionnaire, were also encouraged. The results of the poll were discussed by the Steering Committee, which evaluated the necessity for removing selected procedures or adding additional ones, according to criteria of clinical appropriateness and sustainability. A total of 43 recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, recognized as items, were derived by combination of the Delphi survey and two National Expert Meetings, and grouped in different areas. Favourable opinion was reached in 100{\%} of cases for several aspects covering the following areas: medical (familial and personal) history, physical evaluation, imaging tool, second level laboratory tests, disease activity measurement and extrarticular manifestations. After performing PsA diagnosis, identification of specific disease activity scores and clinimetric approaches were suggested for assessing the different clinical subsets. Further, results showed the need for investigation on the presence of several EAMs and risk factors. In the context of any area, a rank was assigned for each item by Expert Committee members, in order to create the logical sequence of the algorithm. The final list of recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, by the Delphi survey and the two National Expert Meetings, was also reported as an algorithm. This study shows results obtained by the combination of a DElphi survey of a group of Italian rheumatologists and two National Expert Meetings, created with the aim of establishing a clinical procedure and algorithm for the diagnosis and the assessment of PsA patients. In order to find accurate and practical diagnostic and assessment items in clinical practice, we have focused our attention on evaluating the different PsA domains. Hence, we conceived the IDEA algorithm in order to address PsA diagnosis and assessment in the context of daily clinical practice. The IDEA algorithm might eventually lead to a multidimensional approach and could represent a useful and practical tool for addressing diagnosis and for assessing the disease appropriately. However, the elaborated algorithm needs to be further investigated in daily practice, for evidencing and proving its eventual efficacy in detecting and staging PsA and its heterogeneous spectrum appropriately.",
keywords = "Arthritis, Comorbidities, Diagnosis algorithm, Psoriasis, Psoriatic arthritis, Rheumatology",
author = "Giovanni Lapadula and A. Marchesoni and F. Salaffi and R. Ramonda and C. Salvarani and L. Punzi and L. Costa and F. Caso and D. Simone and G. Baiocchi and C. Scioscia and {Di Carlo}, M. and R. Scarpa and G. Ferraccioli",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.4081/reumatismo.2016.913",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "126--136",
journal = "Reumatismo",
issn = "0048-7449",
publisher = "PAGEPRESS PUBL",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based algorithm for diagnosis and assessment in psoriatic arthritis

T2 - Results by Italian DELphi in psoriatic arthritis (IDEA)

AU - Lapadula, Giovanni

AU - Marchesoni, A.

AU - Salaffi, F.

AU - Ramonda, R.

AU - Salvarani, C.

AU - Punzi, L.

AU - Costa, L.

AU - Caso, F.

AU - Simone, D.

AU - Baiocchi, G.

AU - Scioscia, C.

AU - Di Carlo, M.

AU - Scarpa, R.

AU - Ferraccioli, G.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving skin, peripheral joints, entheses, and axial skeleton. The disease is frequently associated with extrarticular manifestations (EAMs) and comorbidities. In order to create a protocol for PsA diagnosis and global assessment of patients with an algorithm based on anamnestic, clinical, laboratory and imaging procedures, we established a DElphi study on a national scale, named Italian DElphi in psoriatic Arthritis (IDEA). After a literature search, a Delphi poll, involving 52 rheumatologists, was performed. On the basis of the literature search, 202 potential items were identified. The steering committee planned at least two Delphi rounds. In the first Delphi round, the experts judged each of the 202 items using a score ranging from 1 to 9 based on its increasing clinical relevance. The questions posed to experts were How relevant is this procedure/observation/sign/symptom for assessment of a psoriatic arthritis patient? Proposals of additional items, not included in the questionnaire, were also encouraged. The results of the poll were discussed by the Steering Committee, which evaluated the necessity for removing selected procedures or adding additional ones, according to criteria of clinical appropriateness and sustainability. A total of 43 recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, recognized as items, were derived by combination of the Delphi survey and two National Expert Meetings, and grouped in different areas. Favourable opinion was reached in 100% of cases for several aspects covering the following areas: medical (familial and personal) history, physical evaluation, imaging tool, second level laboratory tests, disease activity measurement and extrarticular manifestations. After performing PsA diagnosis, identification of specific disease activity scores and clinimetric approaches were suggested for assessing the different clinical subsets. Further, results showed the need for investigation on the presence of several EAMs and risk factors. In the context of any area, a rank was assigned for each item by Expert Committee members, in order to create the logical sequence of the algorithm. The final list of recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, by the Delphi survey and the two National Expert Meetings, was also reported as an algorithm. This study shows results obtained by the combination of a DElphi survey of a group of Italian rheumatologists and two National Expert Meetings, created with the aim of establishing a clinical procedure and algorithm for the diagnosis and the assessment of PsA patients. In order to find accurate and practical diagnostic and assessment items in clinical practice, we have focused our attention on evaluating the different PsA domains. Hence, we conceived the IDEA algorithm in order to address PsA diagnosis and assessment in the context of daily clinical practice. The IDEA algorithm might eventually lead to a multidimensional approach and could represent a useful and practical tool for addressing diagnosis and for assessing the disease appropriately. However, the elaborated algorithm needs to be further investigated in daily practice, for evidencing and proving its eventual efficacy in detecting and staging PsA and its heterogeneous spectrum appropriately.

AB - Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving skin, peripheral joints, entheses, and axial skeleton. The disease is frequently associated with extrarticular manifestations (EAMs) and comorbidities. In order to create a protocol for PsA diagnosis and global assessment of patients with an algorithm based on anamnestic, clinical, laboratory and imaging procedures, we established a DElphi study on a national scale, named Italian DElphi in psoriatic Arthritis (IDEA). After a literature search, a Delphi poll, involving 52 rheumatologists, was performed. On the basis of the literature search, 202 potential items were identified. The steering committee planned at least two Delphi rounds. In the first Delphi round, the experts judged each of the 202 items using a score ranging from 1 to 9 based on its increasing clinical relevance. The questions posed to experts were How relevant is this procedure/observation/sign/symptom for assessment of a psoriatic arthritis patient? Proposals of additional items, not included in the questionnaire, were also encouraged. The results of the poll were discussed by the Steering Committee, which evaluated the necessity for removing selected procedures or adding additional ones, according to criteria of clinical appropriateness and sustainability. A total of 43 recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, recognized as items, were derived by combination of the Delphi survey and two National Expert Meetings, and grouped in different areas. Favourable opinion was reached in 100% of cases for several aspects covering the following areas: medical (familial and personal) history, physical evaluation, imaging tool, second level laboratory tests, disease activity measurement and extrarticular manifestations. After performing PsA diagnosis, identification of specific disease activity scores and clinimetric approaches were suggested for assessing the different clinical subsets. Further, results showed the need for investigation on the presence of several EAMs and risk factors. In the context of any area, a rank was assigned for each item by Expert Committee members, in order to create the logical sequence of the algorithm. The final list of recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, by the Delphi survey and the two National Expert Meetings, was also reported as an algorithm. This study shows results obtained by the combination of a DElphi survey of a group of Italian rheumatologists and two National Expert Meetings, created with the aim of establishing a clinical procedure and algorithm for the diagnosis and the assessment of PsA patients. In order to find accurate and practical diagnostic and assessment items in clinical practice, we have focused our attention on evaluating the different PsA domains. Hence, we conceived the IDEA algorithm in order to address PsA diagnosis and assessment in the context of daily clinical practice. The IDEA algorithm might eventually lead to a multidimensional approach and could represent a useful and practical tool for addressing diagnosis and for assessing the disease appropriately. However, the elaborated algorithm needs to be further investigated in daily practice, for evidencing and proving its eventual efficacy in detecting and staging PsA and its heterogeneous spectrum appropriately.

KW - Arthritis

KW - Comorbidities

KW - Diagnosis algorithm

KW - Psoriasis

KW - Psoriatic arthritis

KW - Rheumatology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006797924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006797924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4081/reumatismo.2016.913

DO - 10.4081/reumatismo.2016.913

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85006797924

VL - 68

SP - 126

EP - 136

JO - Reumatismo

JF - Reumatismo

SN - 0048-7449

IS - 3

ER -