Evidence-based vs. 'impressionist' medicine: How best to implement guidelines

Jean Pierre Bassand, Silvia Priori, Michal Tendera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Implementing clinical practice guidelines improves outcomes. This has been shown by several large scale registries. However, in spite of this, guidelines are poorly implemented in clinical practice for a wide variety of reasons. We examine the reasons behind the low uptake of guidelines into routine medical practice. Many physicians are simply not aware that guidelines exist; or they do not believe in them; or they simply do not care to implement them. Economic and social factors may also influence uptake of guidelines. It is the role of professional societies to disseminate best scientific knowledge, and ensure optimum implementation of guidelines. This can be achieved through educational activities and CME credit. Close collaboration between the profession, health authorities, and maybe even the industry could improve uptake of clinical practice guidelines, and thereby improve patient outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1155-1158
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume26
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Medicine
Guidelines
Practice Guidelines
Professional Role
Health Occupations
Registries
Industry
Economics
Physicians
Education

Keywords

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Guidelines
  • Implementation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Evidence-based vs. 'impressionist' medicine : How best to implement guidelines. / Bassand, Jean Pierre; Priori, Silvia; Tendera, Michal.

In: European Heart Journal, Vol. 26, No. 12, 06.2005, p. 1155-1158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bassand, Jean Pierre ; Priori, Silvia ; Tendera, Michal. / Evidence-based vs. 'impressionist' medicine : How best to implement guidelines. In: European Heart Journal. 2005 ; Vol. 26, No. 12. pp. 1155-1158.
@article{953d523aaed449b4a1338eb0e65a3c2f,
title = "Evidence-based vs. 'impressionist' medicine: How best to implement guidelines",
abstract = "Implementing clinical practice guidelines improves outcomes. This has been shown by several large scale registries. However, in spite of this, guidelines are poorly implemented in clinical practice for a wide variety of reasons. We examine the reasons behind the low uptake of guidelines into routine medical practice. Many physicians are simply not aware that guidelines exist; or they do not believe in them; or they simply do not care to implement them. Economic and social factors may also influence uptake of guidelines. It is the role of professional societies to disseminate best scientific knowledge, and ensure optimum implementation of guidelines. This can be achieved through educational activities and CME credit. Close collaboration between the profession, health authorities, and maybe even the industry could improve uptake of clinical practice guidelines, and thereby improve patient outcome.",
keywords = "Evidence-based medicine, Guidelines, Implementation",
author = "Bassand, {Jean Pierre} and Silvia Priori and Michal Tendera",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/ehi262",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1155--1158",
journal = "European Heart Journal",
issn = "0195-668X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based vs. 'impressionist' medicine

T2 - How best to implement guidelines

AU - Bassand, Jean Pierre

AU - Priori, Silvia

AU - Tendera, Michal

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Implementing clinical practice guidelines improves outcomes. This has been shown by several large scale registries. However, in spite of this, guidelines are poorly implemented in clinical practice for a wide variety of reasons. We examine the reasons behind the low uptake of guidelines into routine medical practice. Many physicians are simply not aware that guidelines exist; or they do not believe in them; or they simply do not care to implement them. Economic and social factors may also influence uptake of guidelines. It is the role of professional societies to disseminate best scientific knowledge, and ensure optimum implementation of guidelines. This can be achieved through educational activities and CME credit. Close collaboration between the profession, health authorities, and maybe even the industry could improve uptake of clinical practice guidelines, and thereby improve patient outcome.

AB - Implementing clinical practice guidelines improves outcomes. This has been shown by several large scale registries. However, in spite of this, guidelines are poorly implemented in clinical practice for a wide variety of reasons. We examine the reasons behind the low uptake of guidelines into routine medical practice. Many physicians are simply not aware that guidelines exist; or they do not believe in them; or they simply do not care to implement them. Economic and social factors may also influence uptake of guidelines. It is the role of professional societies to disseminate best scientific knowledge, and ensure optimum implementation of guidelines. This can be achieved through educational activities and CME credit. Close collaboration between the profession, health authorities, and maybe even the industry could improve uptake of clinical practice guidelines, and thereby improve patient outcome.

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Guidelines

KW - Implementation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20844450370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20844450370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi262

DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi262

M3 - Article

C2 - 15870117

AN - SCOPUS:20844450370

VL - 26

SP - 1155

EP - 1158

JO - European Heart Journal

JF - European Heart Journal

SN - 0195-668X

IS - 12

ER -