Expanding the Living Donor Pool "second Act": Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment

J. Romagnoli, M. P. Salerno, N. Mamode, R. Calia, G. Spagnoletti, V. Bianchi, M. Maresca, N. Piccirillo, R. Putzulu, P. Piselli, E. Cola, G. Zini, F. Citterio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background To safely expand our living donor pool, we recently decided to work on 3 areas: analysis of causes of exclusion of potential donors, the results of which we recently published, introduction of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of the new strategy on living donor recruitment and transplantation during over a 10-year period at a single institution. Methods From January 2005 to September 2014, we evaluated 131 living donors. Of these, 80 (61%) were genetically related, 51 (39%) unrelated, 119 (91%) ABO compatible (ABOc), 12 ABOi (9%). The analysis was divided into 2 eras: era 1, 2005-2010 (n = 53) included the use of open lumbotomy and acceptance of ABOc only; and era 2, 2011-2014 (n = 78), which saw the introduction of LDN and ABOi transplantation. Results Forty-five (34%) potential candidates successfully donated, 67 (51%) were excluded, and 19 (15%) were actively undergoing evaluation. Overall, 53 potential donors were evaluated in era 1 (8.8 donors/year), 78 in era 2 (19.5 donors/year). There were fewer excluded donors in era 2 vs era 1 (62% era 1 vs 44% era 2), and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) significantly increased in era 2 vs era 1 (3.3/year era 1 vs 7.1/year era 2). The establishment of an ABOi LDKT program led to a 15% increase of evaluations in era 2 (12/78 donors). Conclusions LDN along with ABOi LDKT allowed for an improvement in recruitment of living donors and corresponding LDKT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2126-2129
Number of pages4
JournalTransplantation Proceedings
Volume47
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Living Donors
Nephrectomy
Kidney Transplantation
Tissue Donors
Transplantation
Donor Selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Expanding the Living Donor Pool "second Act" : Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment. / Romagnoli, J.; Salerno, M. P.; Mamode, N.; Calia, R.; Spagnoletti, G.; Bianchi, V.; Maresca, M.; Piccirillo, N.; Putzulu, R.; Piselli, P.; Cola, E.; Zini, G.; Citterio, F.

In: Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 47, No. 7, 01.09.2015, p. 2126-2129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Romagnoli, J, Salerno, MP, Mamode, N, Calia, R, Spagnoletti, G, Bianchi, V, Maresca, M, Piccirillo, N, Putzulu, R, Piselli, P, Cola, E, Zini, G & Citterio, F 2015, 'Expanding the Living Donor Pool "second Act": Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment', Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 2126-2129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.071
Romagnoli, J. ; Salerno, M. P. ; Mamode, N. ; Calia, R. ; Spagnoletti, G. ; Bianchi, V. ; Maresca, M. ; Piccirillo, N. ; Putzulu, R. ; Piselli, P. ; Cola, E. ; Zini, G. ; Citterio, F. / Expanding the Living Donor Pool "second Act" : Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment. In: Transplantation Proceedings. 2015 ; Vol. 47, No. 7. pp. 2126-2129.
@article{0361956643274e148d6abc586d741850,
title = "Expanding the Living Donor Pool {"}second Act{"}: Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment",
abstract = "Background To safely expand our living donor pool, we recently decided to work on 3 areas: analysis of causes of exclusion of potential donors, the results of which we recently published, introduction of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of the new strategy on living donor recruitment and transplantation during over a 10-year period at a single institution. Methods From January 2005 to September 2014, we evaluated 131 living donors. Of these, 80 (61{\%}) were genetically related, 51 (39{\%}) unrelated, 119 (91{\%}) ABO compatible (ABOc), 12 ABOi (9{\%}). The analysis was divided into 2 eras: era 1, 2005-2010 (n = 53) included the use of open lumbotomy and acceptance of ABOc only; and era 2, 2011-2014 (n = 78), which saw the introduction of LDN and ABOi transplantation. Results Forty-five (34{\%}) potential candidates successfully donated, 67 (51{\%}) were excluded, and 19 (15{\%}) were actively undergoing evaluation. Overall, 53 potential donors were evaluated in era 1 (8.8 donors/year), 78 in era 2 (19.5 donors/year). There were fewer excluded donors in era 2 vs era 1 (62{\%} era 1 vs 44{\%} era 2), and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) significantly increased in era 2 vs era 1 (3.3/year era 1 vs 7.1/year era 2). The establishment of an ABOi LDKT program led to a 15{\%} increase of evaluations in era 2 (12/78 donors). Conclusions LDN along with ABOi LDKT allowed for an improvement in recruitment of living donors and corresponding LDKT.",
author = "J. Romagnoli and Salerno, {M. P.} and N. Mamode and R. Calia and G. Spagnoletti and V. Bianchi and M. Maresca and N. Piccirillo and R. Putzulu and P. Piselli and E. Cola and G. Zini and F. Citterio",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.071",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "2126--2129",
journal = "Transplantation Proceedings",
issn = "0041-1345",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expanding the Living Donor Pool "second Act"

T2 - Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment

AU - Romagnoli, J.

AU - Salerno, M. P.

AU - Mamode, N.

AU - Calia, R.

AU - Spagnoletti, G.

AU - Bianchi, V.

AU - Maresca, M.

AU - Piccirillo, N.

AU - Putzulu, R.

AU - Piselli, P.

AU - Cola, E.

AU - Zini, G.

AU - Citterio, F.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Background To safely expand our living donor pool, we recently decided to work on 3 areas: analysis of causes of exclusion of potential donors, the results of which we recently published, introduction of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of the new strategy on living donor recruitment and transplantation during over a 10-year period at a single institution. Methods From January 2005 to September 2014, we evaluated 131 living donors. Of these, 80 (61%) were genetically related, 51 (39%) unrelated, 119 (91%) ABO compatible (ABOc), 12 ABOi (9%). The analysis was divided into 2 eras: era 1, 2005-2010 (n = 53) included the use of open lumbotomy and acceptance of ABOc only; and era 2, 2011-2014 (n = 78), which saw the introduction of LDN and ABOi transplantation. Results Forty-five (34%) potential candidates successfully donated, 67 (51%) were excluded, and 19 (15%) were actively undergoing evaluation. Overall, 53 potential donors were evaluated in era 1 (8.8 donors/year), 78 in era 2 (19.5 donors/year). There were fewer excluded donors in era 2 vs era 1 (62% era 1 vs 44% era 2), and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) significantly increased in era 2 vs era 1 (3.3/year era 1 vs 7.1/year era 2). The establishment of an ABOi LDKT program led to a 15% increase of evaluations in era 2 (12/78 donors). Conclusions LDN along with ABOi LDKT allowed for an improvement in recruitment of living donors and corresponding LDKT.

AB - Background To safely expand our living donor pool, we recently decided to work on 3 areas: analysis of causes of exclusion of potential donors, the results of which we recently published, introduction of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of the new strategy on living donor recruitment and transplantation during over a 10-year period at a single institution. Methods From January 2005 to September 2014, we evaluated 131 living donors. Of these, 80 (61%) were genetically related, 51 (39%) unrelated, 119 (91%) ABO compatible (ABOc), 12 ABOi (9%). The analysis was divided into 2 eras: era 1, 2005-2010 (n = 53) included the use of open lumbotomy and acceptance of ABOc only; and era 2, 2011-2014 (n = 78), which saw the introduction of LDN and ABOi transplantation. Results Forty-five (34%) potential candidates successfully donated, 67 (51%) were excluded, and 19 (15%) were actively undergoing evaluation. Overall, 53 potential donors were evaluated in era 1 (8.8 donors/year), 78 in era 2 (19.5 donors/year). There were fewer excluded donors in era 2 vs era 1 (62% era 1 vs 44% era 2), and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) significantly increased in era 2 vs era 1 (3.3/year era 1 vs 7.1/year era 2). The establishment of an ABOi LDKT program led to a 15% increase of evaluations in era 2 (12/78 donors). Conclusions LDN along with ABOi LDKT allowed for an improvement in recruitment of living donors and corresponding LDKT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940996119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940996119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.071

DO - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.071

M3 - Article

C2 - 26361659

AN - SCOPUS:84940996119

VL - 47

SP - 2126

EP - 2129

JO - Transplantation Proceedings

JF - Transplantation Proceedings

SN - 0041-1345

IS - 7

ER -