Exploring the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of OCT for diagnosing glaucoma

Manuele Michelessi, Luciano Quaranta, Ivano Riva, Enrico Martini, Michele Figus, Paolo Frezzotti, Luca Agnifili, Gianluca Manni, Stefano Miglior, Chiara Posarelli, Stefano Fazio, Francesco Oddone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims: To explore the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in glaucoma and assess the reliability of a specific reference database when applied to a morphological imaging parameter for diagnostic purposes. Methods: Consecutive subjects enrolled in the Multicenter Italian Glaucoma Imaging Study (MIGIS) have been included in this cross-sectional, comparative evaluation of diagnostic tests study. Patients underwent measurement of global and sectorial peripapillary retinal nerve fibre thickness (pRNFL) and minimum rim width (MRW) by OCT. The sensitivity and specificity of reference-database categorical classifications were calculated by means of 2×2 tables and sensitivity was compared with that of the corresponding continuous parameter extracted from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves by matching the specificity. Results: 280 Caucasian subjects have been included. At matched specificities, the sensitivity of pRNFL categorical classifications was statistically similar to that of the corresponding continuous parameters, whereas the sensitivity of the MRW categorical classifications was significantly lower than that of the corresponding continuous parameters. Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of reference database classifications might be lower than that extrapolated from the ROC curves of continuous parameters used in diagnostic research. The gap between the accuracy of these two approaches may be used to estimate the reliability of a specific reference database when applied to a continuous parameter for diagnostic purposes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Optical Coherence Tomography
Glaucoma
Databases
Research
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Diagnostic Imaging
Nerve Fibers
Routine Diagnostic Tests

Keywords

  • diagnostic tests/Investigation
  • glaucoma
  • imaging
  • optic nerve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Exploring the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of OCT for diagnosing glaucoma. / Michelessi, Manuele; Quaranta, Luciano; Riva, Ivano; Martini, Enrico; Figus, Michele; Frezzotti, Paolo; Agnifili, Luca; Manni, Gianluca; Miglior, Stefano; Posarelli, Chiara; Fazio, Stefano; Oddone, Francesco.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Michelessi, Manuele ; Quaranta, Luciano ; Riva, Ivano ; Martini, Enrico ; Figus, Michele ; Frezzotti, Paolo ; Agnifili, Luca ; Manni, Gianluca ; Miglior, Stefano ; Posarelli, Chiara ; Fazio, Stefano ; Oddone, Francesco. / Exploring the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of OCT for diagnosing glaucoma. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019.
@article{f8bab225f60542b39961f9a1e353d8b1,
title = "Exploring the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of OCT for diagnosing glaucoma",
abstract = "Aims: To explore the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in glaucoma and assess the reliability of a specific reference database when applied to a morphological imaging parameter for diagnostic purposes. Methods: Consecutive subjects enrolled in the Multicenter Italian Glaucoma Imaging Study (MIGIS) have been included in this cross-sectional, comparative evaluation of diagnostic tests study. Patients underwent measurement of global and sectorial peripapillary retinal nerve fibre thickness (pRNFL) and minimum rim width (MRW) by OCT. The sensitivity and specificity of reference-database categorical classifications were calculated by means of 2×2 tables and sensitivity was compared with that of the corresponding continuous parameter extracted from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves by matching the specificity. Results: 280 Caucasian subjects have been included. At matched specificities, the sensitivity of pRNFL categorical classifications was statistically similar to that of the corresponding continuous parameters, whereas the sensitivity of the MRW categorical classifications was significantly lower than that of the corresponding continuous parameters. Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of reference database classifications might be lower than that extrapolated from the ROC curves of continuous parameters used in diagnostic research. The gap between the accuracy of these two approaches may be used to estimate the reliability of a specific reference database when applied to a continuous parameter for diagnostic purposes.",
keywords = "diagnostic tests/Investigation, glaucoma, imaging, optic nerve",
author = "Manuele Michelessi and Luciano Quaranta and Ivano Riva and Enrico Martini and Michele Figus and Paolo Frezzotti and Luca Agnifili and Gianluca Manni and Stefano Miglior and Chiara Posarelli and Stefano Fazio and Francesco Oddone",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314607",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of OCT for diagnosing glaucoma

AU - Michelessi, Manuele

AU - Quaranta, Luciano

AU - Riva, Ivano

AU - Martini, Enrico

AU - Figus, Michele

AU - Frezzotti, Paolo

AU - Agnifili, Luca

AU - Manni, Gianluca

AU - Miglior, Stefano

AU - Posarelli, Chiara

AU - Fazio, Stefano

AU - Oddone, Francesco

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Aims: To explore the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in glaucoma and assess the reliability of a specific reference database when applied to a morphological imaging parameter for diagnostic purposes. Methods: Consecutive subjects enrolled in the Multicenter Italian Glaucoma Imaging Study (MIGIS) have been included in this cross-sectional, comparative evaluation of diagnostic tests study. Patients underwent measurement of global and sectorial peripapillary retinal nerve fibre thickness (pRNFL) and minimum rim width (MRW) by OCT. The sensitivity and specificity of reference-database categorical classifications were calculated by means of 2×2 tables and sensitivity was compared with that of the corresponding continuous parameter extracted from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves by matching the specificity. Results: 280 Caucasian subjects have been included. At matched specificities, the sensitivity of pRNFL categorical classifications was statistically similar to that of the corresponding continuous parameters, whereas the sensitivity of the MRW categorical classifications was significantly lower than that of the corresponding continuous parameters. Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of reference database classifications might be lower than that extrapolated from the ROC curves of continuous parameters used in diagnostic research. The gap between the accuracy of these two approaches may be used to estimate the reliability of a specific reference database when applied to a continuous parameter for diagnostic purposes.

AB - Aims: To explore the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in glaucoma and assess the reliability of a specific reference database when applied to a morphological imaging parameter for diagnostic purposes. Methods: Consecutive subjects enrolled in the Multicenter Italian Glaucoma Imaging Study (MIGIS) have been included in this cross-sectional, comparative evaluation of diagnostic tests study. Patients underwent measurement of global and sectorial peripapillary retinal nerve fibre thickness (pRNFL) and minimum rim width (MRW) by OCT. The sensitivity and specificity of reference-database categorical classifications were calculated by means of 2×2 tables and sensitivity was compared with that of the corresponding continuous parameter extracted from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves by matching the specificity. Results: 280 Caucasian subjects have been included. At matched specificities, the sensitivity of pRNFL categorical classifications was statistically similar to that of the corresponding continuous parameters, whereas the sensitivity of the MRW categorical classifications was significantly lower than that of the corresponding continuous parameters. Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of reference database classifications might be lower than that extrapolated from the ROC curves of continuous parameters used in diagnostic research. The gap between the accuracy of these two approaches may be used to estimate the reliability of a specific reference database when applied to a continuous parameter for diagnostic purposes.

KW - diagnostic tests/Investigation

KW - glaucoma

KW - imaging

KW - optic nerve

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075173290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075173290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314607

DO - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314607

M3 - Article

C2 - 31732524

AN - SCOPUS:85075173290

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

ER -