External validation of equations to estimate resting energy expenditure in 14952 adults with overweight and obesity and 1948 adults with normal weight from Italy

Giorgio Bedogni, Simona Bertoli, Alessandro Leone, Ramona De Amicis, Elisa Lucchetti, Fiorenza Agosti, Nicoletta Marazzi, Alberto Battezzati, Alessandro Sartorio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background & aims: We cross-validated 28 equations to estimate resting energy expenditure (REE) in a very large sample of adults with overweight or obesity. Methods: 14952 Caucasian men and women with overweight or obesity and 1498 with normal weight were studied. REE was measured using indirect calorimetry and estimated using two meta-regression equations and 26 other equations. The correct classification fraction (CCF) was defined as the fraction of subjects whose estimated REE was within 10% of measured REE. Results: The highest CCF was 79%, 80%, 72%, 64%, and 63% in subjects with normal weight, overweight, class 1 obesity, class 2 obesity, and class 3 obesity, respectively. The Henry weight and height and Mifflin equations performed equally well with CCFs of 77% vs. 77% for subjects with normal weight, 80% vs. 80% for those with overweight, 72% vs. 72% for those with class 1 obesity, 64% vs. 63% for those with class 2 obesity, and 61% vs. 60% for those with class 3 obesity. The Sabounchi meta-regression equations offered an improvement over the above equations only for class 3 obesity (63%). Conclusions: The accuracy of REE equations decreases with increasing values of body mass index. The Henry weight & height and Mifflin equations are similarly accurate and the Sabounchi equations offer an improvement only in subjects with class 3 obesity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-464
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Nutrition
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Energy Metabolism
Italy
Obesity
Weights and Measures
Indirect Calorimetry
Body Mass Index

Keywords

  • Adults
  • Indirect calorimetry
  • Obesity
  • Overweight
  • Prediction equations
  • Resting energy expenditure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

External validation of equations to estimate resting energy expenditure in 14952 adults with overweight and obesity and 1948 adults with normal weight from Italy. / Bedogni, Giorgio; Bertoli, Simona; Leone, Alessandro; De Amicis, Ramona; Lucchetti, Elisa; Agosti, Fiorenza; Marazzi, Nicoletta; Battezzati, Alberto; Sartorio, Alessandro.

In: Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 38, No. 1, 02.2019, p. 457-464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bedogni, Giorgio ; Bertoli, Simona ; Leone, Alessandro ; De Amicis, Ramona ; Lucchetti, Elisa ; Agosti, Fiorenza ; Marazzi, Nicoletta ; Battezzati, Alberto ; Sartorio, Alessandro. / External validation of equations to estimate resting energy expenditure in 14952 adults with overweight and obesity and 1948 adults with normal weight from Italy. In: Clinical Nutrition. 2019 ; Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. 457-464.
@article{8092a1b91d6e4a1aa679a901ece1e4c8,
title = "External validation of equations to estimate resting energy expenditure in 14952 adults with overweight and obesity and 1948 adults with normal weight from Italy",
abstract = "Background & aims: We cross-validated 28 equations to estimate resting energy expenditure (REE) in a very large sample of adults with overweight or obesity. Methods: 14952 Caucasian men and women with overweight or obesity and 1498 with normal weight were studied. REE was measured using indirect calorimetry and estimated using two meta-regression equations and 26 other equations. The correct classification fraction (CCF) was defined as the fraction of subjects whose estimated REE was within 10{\%} of measured REE. Results: The highest CCF was 79{\%}, 80{\%}, 72{\%}, 64{\%}, and 63{\%} in subjects with normal weight, overweight, class 1 obesity, class 2 obesity, and class 3 obesity, respectively. The Henry weight and height and Mifflin equations performed equally well with CCFs of 77{\%} vs. 77{\%} for subjects with normal weight, 80{\%} vs. 80{\%} for those with overweight, 72{\%} vs. 72{\%} for those with class 1 obesity, 64{\%} vs. 63{\%} for those with class 2 obesity, and 61{\%} vs. 60{\%} for those with class 3 obesity. The Sabounchi meta-regression equations offered an improvement over the above equations only for class 3 obesity (63{\%}). Conclusions: The accuracy of REE equations decreases with increasing values of body mass index. The Henry weight & height and Mifflin equations are similarly accurate and the Sabounchi equations offer an improvement only in subjects with class 3 obesity.",
keywords = "Adults, Indirect calorimetry, Obesity, Overweight, Prediction equations, Resting energy expenditure",
author = "Giorgio Bedogni and Simona Bertoli and Alessandro Leone and {De Amicis}, Ramona and Elisa Lucchetti and Fiorenza Agosti and Nicoletta Marazzi and Alberto Battezzati and Alessandro Sartorio",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.clnu.2017.11.011",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "457--464",
journal = "Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0261-5614",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - External validation of equations to estimate resting energy expenditure in 14952 adults with overweight and obesity and 1948 adults with normal weight from Italy

AU - Bedogni, Giorgio

AU - Bertoli, Simona

AU - Leone, Alessandro

AU - De Amicis, Ramona

AU - Lucchetti, Elisa

AU - Agosti, Fiorenza

AU - Marazzi, Nicoletta

AU - Battezzati, Alberto

AU - Sartorio, Alessandro

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Background & aims: We cross-validated 28 equations to estimate resting energy expenditure (REE) in a very large sample of adults with overweight or obesity. Methods: 14952 Caucasian men and women with overweight or obesity and 1498 with normal weight were studied. REE was measured using indirect calorimetry and estimated using two meta-regression equations and 26 other equations. The correct classification fraction (CCF) was defined as the fraction of subjects whose estimated REE was within 10% of measured REE. Results: The highest CCF was 79%, 80%, 72%, 64%, and 63% in subjects with normal weight, overweight, class 1 obesity, class 2 obesity, and class 3 obesity, respectively. The Henry weight and height and Mifflin equations performed equally well with CCFs of 77% vs. 77% for subjects with normal weight, 80% vs. 80% for those with overweight, 72% vs. 72% for those with class 1 obesity, 64% vs. 63% for those with class 2 obesity, and 61% vs. 60% for those with class 3 obesity. The Sabounchi meta-regression equations offered an improvement over the above equations only for class 3 obesity (63%). Conclusions: The accuracy of REE equations decreases with increasing values of body mass index. The Henry weight & height and Mifflin equations are similarly accurate and the Sabounchi equations offer an improvement only in subjects with class 3 obesity.

AB - Background & aims: We cross-validated 28 equations to estimate resting energy expenditure (REE) in a very large sample of adults with overweight or obesity. Methods: 14952 Caucasian men and women with overweight or obesity and 1498 with normal weight were studied. REE was measured using indirect calorimetry and estimated using two meta-regression equations and 26 other equations. The correct classification fraction (CCF) was defined as the fraction of subjects whose estimated REE was within 10% of measured REE. Results: The highest CCF was 79%, 80%, 72%, 64%, and 63% in subjects with normal weight, overweight, class 1 obesity, class 2 obesity, and class 3 obesity, respectively. The Henry weight and height and Mifflin equations performed equally well with CCFs of 77% vs. 77% for subjects with normal weight, 80% vs. 80% for those with overweight, 72% vs. 72% for those with class 1 obesity, 64% vs. 63% for those with class 2 obesity, and 61% vs. 60% for those with class 3 obesity. The Sabounchi meta-regression equations offered an improvement over the above equations only for class 3 obesity (63%). Conclusions: The accuracy of REE equations decreases with increasing values of body mass index. The Henry weight & height and Mifflin equations are similarly accurate and the Sabounchi equations offer an improvement only in subjects with class 3 obesity.

KW - Adults

KW - Indirect calorimetry

KW - Obesity

KW - Overweight

KW - Prediction equations

KW - Resting energy expenditure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044718652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044718652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.11.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 29224893

AN - SCOPUS:85044718652

VL - 38

SP - 457

EP - 464

JO - Clinical Nutrition

JF - Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0261-5614

IS - 1

ER -