Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications

Matteo Formica, Andrea Zanirato, Luca Cavagnaro, Marco Basso, Stefano Divano, Lamberto Felli, Carlo Formica

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of the study: To evaluate clinical outcomes and complications of extreme lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) in spinal revision surgery comparing our data with the available literature evidence about other fusion techniques. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients underwent revision surgery with XLIF as interbody fusion technique. Demographic, comorbidity, surgical data, clinical results, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: 36 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 28 ± 11.5 months, were included in the analysis. 41 levels were fused with XLIF. The mean number of previous spine surgery was 1.5 ± 0.7. Mean improvement in back pain and leg pain on VAS was 5.6 ± 1.4 (p < 0.01) and 3.5 ± 2 (p < 0.01), respectively. Mean improvement in the ODI score was 30.3 ± 7.3 (p < 0.01). 1 vertebral endplate fracture during interbody space preparation was reported during lateral approach. 5 patients (13.8%) complained quadriceps weakness and anterior thigh hypoesthesia fully recovered after 3 months from surgery, and in one case, a transient contralateral radiculopathy was observed. No implant failure was detected at final follow-up. Conclusions: XLIF is a reasonably safe and effective fusion technique in revision surgery that allows valid arthrodesis avoiding scarred tissue created by previous surgical approaches. Especially, XLIF reduces the risk of nerve root lesions, postoperative radiculitis, and durotomies compared to posterior fusion techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)464-470
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Spinal Fusion
Reoperation
Radiculopathy
Hypesthesia
Arthrodesis
Intraoperative Complications
Back Pain
Thigh
Comorbidity
Leg
Spine
Demography
Pain

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Extreme lateral interbody fusion
  • Failed back surgery
  • Lateral lumbar interbody fusion
  • Spinal revision surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Formica, M., Zanirato, A., Cavagnaro, L., Basso, M., Divano, S., Felli, L., & Formica, C. (2017). Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications. European Spine Journal, 26, 464-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5115-6

Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery : clinical results and complications. / Formica, Matteo; Zanirato, Andrea; Cavagnaro, Luca; Basso, Marco; Divano, Stefano; Felli, Lamberto; Formica, Carlo.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 26, 01.10.2017, p. 464-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Formica, M, Zanirato, A, Cavagnaro, L, Basso, M, Divano, S, Felli, L & Formica, C 2017, 'Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications', European Spine Journal, vol. 26, pp. 464-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5115-6
Formica, Matteo ; Zanirato, Andrea ; Cavagnaro, Luca ; Basso, Marco ; Divano, Stefano ; Felli, Lamberto ; Formica, Carlo. / Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery : clinical results and complications. In: European Spine Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 26. pp. 464-470.
@article{c483db3281de4dda8e611380a6ef03b0,
title = "Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications",
abstract = "Purpose of the study: To evaluate clinical outcomes and complications of extreme lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) in spinal revision surgery comparing our data with the available literature evidence about other fusion techniques. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients underwent revision surgery with XLIF as interbody fusion technique. Demographic, comorbidity, surgical data, clinical results, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: 36 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 28 ± 11.5 months, were included in the analysis. 41 levels were fused with XLIF. The mean number of previous spine surgery was 1.5 ± 0.7. Mean improvement in back pain and leg pain on VAS was 5.6 ± 1.4 (p < 0.01) and 3.5 ± 2 (p < 0.01), respectively. Mean improvement in the ODI score was 30.3 ± 7.3 (p < 0.01). 1 vertebral endplate fracture during interbody space preparation was reported during lateral approach. 5 patients (13.8{\%}) complained quadriceps weakness and anterior thigh hypoesthesia fully recovered after 3 months from surgery, and in one case, a transient contralateral radiculopathy was observed. No implant failure was detected at final follow-up. Conclusions: XLIF is a reasonably safe and effective fusion technique in revision surgery that allows valid arthrodesis avoiding scarred tissue created by previous surgical approaches. Especially, XLIF reduces the risk of nerve root lesions, postoperative radiculitis, and durotomies compared to posterior fusion techniques.",
keywords = "Complications, Extreme lateral interbody fusion, Failed back surgery, Lateral lumbar interbody fusion, Spinal revision surgery",
author = "Matteo Formica and Andrea Zanirato and Luca Cavagnaro and Marco Basso and Stefano Divano and Lamberto Felli and Carlo Formica",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-017-5115-6",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "464--470",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery

T2 - clinical results and complications

AU - Formica, Matteo

AU - Zanirato, Andrea

AU - Cavagnaro, Luca

AU - Basso, Marco

AU - Divano, Stefano

AU - Felli, Lamberto

AU - Formica, Carlo

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Purpose of the study: To evaluate clinical outcomes and complications of extreme lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) in spinal revision surgery comparing our data with the available literature evidence about other fusion techniques. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients underwent revision surgery with XLIF as interbody fusion technique. Demographic, comorbidity, surgical data, clinical results, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: 36 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 28 ± 11.5 months, were included in the analysis. 41 levels were fused with XLIF. The mean number of previous spine surgery was 1.5 ± 0.7. Mean improvement in back pain and leg pain on VAS was 5.6 ± 1.4 (p < 0.01) and 3.5 ± 2 (p < 0.01), respectively. Mean improvement in the ODI score was 30.3 ± 7.3 (p < 0.01). 1 vertebral endplate fracture during interbody space preparation was reported during lateral approach. 5 patients (13.8%) complained quadriceps weakness and anterior thigh hypoesthesia fully recovered after 3 months from surgery, and in one case, a transient contralateral radiculopathy was observed. No implant failure was detected at final follow-up. Conclusions: XLIF is a reasonably safe and effective fusion technique in revision surgery that allows valid arthrodesis avoiding scarred tissue created by previous surgical approaches. Especially, XLIF reduces the risk of nerve root lesions, postoperative radiculitis, and durotomies compared to posterior fusion techniques.

AB - Purpose of the study: To evaluate clinical outcomes and complications of extreme lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) in spinal revision surgery comparing our data with the available literature evidence about other fusion techniques. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients underwent revision surgery with XLIF as interbody fusion technique. Demographic, comorbidity, surgical data, clinical results, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: 36 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 28 ± 11.5 months, were included in the analysis. 41 levels were fused with XLIF. The mean number of previous spine surgery was 1.5 ± 0.7. Mean improvement in back pain and leg pain on VAS was 5.6 ± 1.4 (p < 0.01) and 3.5 ± 2 (p < 0.01), respectively. Mean improvement in the ODI score was 30.3 ± 7.3 (p < 0.01). 1 vertebral endplate fracture during interbody space preparation was reported during lateral approach. 5 patients (13.8%) complained quadriceps weakness and anterior thigh hypoesthesia fully recovered after 3 months from surgery, and in one case, a transient contralateral radiculopathy was observed. No implant failure was detected at final follow-up. Conclusions: XLIF is a reasonably safe and effective fusion technique in revision surgery that allows valid arthrodesis avoiding scarred tissue created by previous surgical approaches. Especially, XLIF reduces the risk of nerve root lesions, postoperative radiculitis, and durotomies compared to posterior fusion techniques.

KW - Complications

KW - Extreme lateral interbody fusion

KW - Failed back surgery

KW - Lateral lumbar interbody fusion

KW - Spinal revision surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019162453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019162453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-017-5115-6

DO - 10.1007/s00586-017-5115-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85019162453

VL - 26

SP - 464

EP - 470

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

ER -