Factors of delay in the diagnosis of melanoma

Roberto Betti, Raffaella Vergani, Elena Tolomio, Roberto Santambrogio, Carlo Crosti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Delay in the diagnosis of melanoma was defined as the interval in months from the patient's report of first noticing a suspected lesion to the date of the removal of a histologically confirmed melanoma. 216 patients were included in our study. Total delay was subdivided in three components: patient, medical and referral delay. The major component of delay is due to the patient and the most important cause of it was lack of concern. Lesions in men were detected more frequently by family members, while in women melanomas tended to be self-detected. Nodular melanoma had lower delay but higher thickness. Amelanotic melanomas had a higher delay principally due to the physicians. A significative positive correlation between Breslow thickness and patient delay was observed. The visibility of the tumor and the educational or socio-economic status did not seem to improve early diagnosis. The observation about the shorter delays in thicker tumors lead us to think that educational campaigns should be more focused on recognition of changing or growing lesions than other signs of the ABCD rule and that nodular melanomas are quite different from superficial spreading melanomas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-188
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Dermatology
Volume13
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2003

Fingerprint

Melanoma
Amelanotic Melanoma
Early Diagnosis
Neoplasms
Referral and Consultation
Economics
Observation
Physicians

Keywords

  • Early diagnosis
  • Melanoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Betti, R., Vergani, R., Tolomio, E., Santambrogio, R., & Crosti, C. (2003). Factors of delay in the diagnosis of melanoma. European Journal of Dermatology, 13(2), 183-188.

Factors of delay in the diagnosis of melanoma. / Betti, Roberto; Vergani, Raffaella; Tolomio, Elena; Santambrogio, Roberto; Crosti, Carlo.

In: European Journal of Dermatology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 03.2003, p. 183-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Betti, R, Vergani, R, Tolomio, E, Santambrogio, R & Crosti, C 2003, 'Factors of delay in the diagnosis of melanoma', European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 183-188.
Betti R, Vergani R, Tolomio E, Santambrogio R, Crosti C. Factors of delay in the diagnosis of melanoma. European Journal of Dermatology. 2003 Mar;13(2):183-188.
Betti, Roberto ; Vergani, Raffaella ; Tolomio, Elena ; Santambrogio, Roberto ; Crosti, Carlo. / Factors of delay in the diagnosis of melanoma. In: European Journal of Dermatology. 2003 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 183-188.
@article{3465850fa3be472d8c7f73596ceee0f5,
title = "Factors of delay in the diagnosis of melanoma",
abstract = "Delay in the diagnosis of melanoma was defined as the interval in months from the patient's report of first noticing a suspected lesion to the date of the removal of a histologically confirmed melanoma. 216 patients were included in our study. Total delay was subdivided in three components: patient, medical and referral delay. The major component of delay is due to the patient and the most important cause of it was lack of concern. Lesions in men were detected more frequently by family members, while in women melanomas tended to be self-detected. Nodular melanoma had lower delay but higher thickness. Amelanotic melanomas had a higher delay principally due to the physicians. A significative positive correlation between Breslow thickness and patient delay was observed. The visibility of the tumor and the educational or socio-economic status did not seem to improve early diagnosis. The observation about the shorter delays in thicker tumors lead us to think that educational campaigns should be more focused on recognition of changing or growing lesions than other signs of the ABCD rule and that nodular melanomas are quite different from superficial spreading melanomas.",
keywords = "Early diagnosis, Melanoma",
author = "Roberto Betti and Raffaella Vergani and Elena Tolomio and Roberto Santambrogio and Carlo Crosti",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "183--188",
journal = "European Journal of Dermatology",
issn = "1167-1122",
publisher = "NLM (Medline)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors of delay in the diagnosis of melanoma

AU - Betti, Roberto

AU - Vergani, Raffaella

AU - Tolomio, Elena

AU - Santambrogio, Roberto

AU - Crosti, Carlo

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - Delay in the diagnosis of melanoma was defined as the interval in months from the patient's report of first noticing a suspected lesion to the date of the removal of a histologically confirmed melanoma. 216 patients were included in our study. Total delay was subdivided in three components: patient, medical and referral delay. The major component of delay is due to the patient and the most important cause of it was lack of concern. Lesions in men were detected more frequently by family members, while in women melanomas tended to be self-detected. Nodular melanoma had lower delay but higher thickness. Amelanotic melanomas had a higher delay principally due to the physicians. A significative positive correlation between Breslow thickness and patient delay was observed. The visibility of the tumor and the educational or socio-economic status did not seem to improve early diagnosis. The observation about the shorter delays in thicker tumors lead us to think that educational campaigns should be more focused on recognition of changing or growing lesions than other signs of the ABCD rule and that nodular melanomas are quite different from superficial spreading melanomas.

AB - Delay in the diagnosis of melanoma was defined as the interval in months from the patient's report of first noticing a suspected lesion to the date of the removal of a histologically confirmed melanoma. 216 patients were included in our study. Total delay was subdivided in three components: patient, medical and referral delay. The major component of delay is due to the patient and the most important cause of it was lack of concern. Lesions in men were detected more frequently by family members, while in women melanomas tended to be self-detected. Nodular melanoma had lower delay but higher thickness. Amelanotic melanomas had a higher delay principally due to the physicians. A significative positive correlation between Breslow thickness and patient delay was observed. The visibility of the tumor and the educational or socio-economic status did not seem to improve early diagnosis. The observation about the shorter delays in thicker tumors lead us to think that educational campaigns should be more focused on recognition of changing or growing lesions than other signs of the ABCD rule and that nodular melanomas are quite different from superficial spreading melanomas.

KW - Early diagnosis

KW - Melanoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037360476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037360476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12695136

AN - SCOPUS:0037360476

VL - 13

SP - 183

EP - 188

JO - European Journal of Dermatology

JF - European Journal of Dermatology

SN - 1167-1122

IS - 2

ER -