False-Negative Cases on Confocal Microscopy Examination: A Retrospective Evaluation and Critical Reappraisal

Valeria Coco, Francesca Farnetani, Anna Maria Cesinaro, Silvana Ciardo, Giuseppe Argenziano, Ketty Peris, Giovanni Pellacani, Caterina Longo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Confocal microscopy is a second-level examination for dermoscopically equivocal melanocytic lesions. However, the number of false-negative cases on confocal microscopy and the scenarios in which confocal microscopy may fail have not been fully elucidated. Objective: To calculate the percentage of false-negative melanomas upon reflectance confocal microscopy examination in a large series of cases. Methods: A retrospective analysis on 201 melanomas, evaluated for dermoscopic/confocal criteria of melanoma, was carried out. Results: Twenty-three melanomas out of 201 cases (11.4%) revealed a low 7-point checklist score. On confocal examination, 22 out of 23 lesions have been diagnosed correctly as melanomas. Only 1 lesion did not display melanoma features, neither upon dermoscopy nor upon confocal microscopy examination. Seven lesions out of 201 cases (3.5%) were judged as negative on confocal examination, even if 6 of them were diagnosed as melanomas by clinical and/or dermoscopic evaluation. After histopathological revision, these cases were grouped into 5 categories: (1) amelanotic melanoma (n = 1), (2) hyperkeratotic melanomas (n = 2), (3) lentiginous melanomas (n = 2), (4) melanoma with small pagetoid cells (n = 1), (5) spitzoid melanoma (n = 1). Conclusion: Confocal and dermoscopic examination, along with patient-related information and clinical history, can lead to an optimal patient management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-97
Number of pages9
JournalDermatology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Confocal Microscopy
Melanoma
Amelanotic Melanoma
Dermoscopy
Checklist

Keywords

  • Confocal microscopy
  • Dermoscopy
  • Histopathology#
  • Melanoma
  • Nevi
  • Skin cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

False-Negative Cases on Confocal Microscopy Examination : A Retrospective Evaluation and Critical Reappraisal. / Coco, Valeria; Farnetani, Francesca; Cesinaro, Anna Maria; Ciardo, Silvana; Argenziano, Giuseppe; Peris, Ketty; Pellacani, Giovanni; Longo, Caterina.

In: Dermatology, 01.04.2016, p. 189-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coco, V, Farnetani, F, Cesinaro, AM, Ciardo, S, Argenziano, G, Peris, K, Pellacani, G & Longo, C 2016, 'False-Negative Cases on Confocal Microscopy Examination: A Retrospective Evaluation and Critical Reappraisal', Dermatology, pp. 189-97. https://doi.org/10.1159/000443637
Coco, Valeria ; Farnetani, Francesca ; Cesinaro, Anna Maria ; Ciardo, Silvana ; Argenziano, Giuseppe ; Peris, Ketty ; Pellacani, Giovanni ; Longo, Caterina. / False-Negative Cases on Confocal Microscopy Examination : A Retrospective Evaluation and Critical Reappraisal. In: Dermatology. 2016 ; pp. 189-97.
@article{937209eb3b364abebd98b89a994b0579,
title = "False-Negative Cases on Confocal Microscopy Examination: A Retrospective Evaluation and Critical Reappraisal",
abstract = "Background: Confocal microscopy is a second-level examination for dermoscopically equivocal melanocytic lesions. However, the number of false-negative cases on confocal microscopy and the scenarios in which confocal microscopy may fail have not been fully elucidated. Objective: To calculate the percentage of false-negative melanomas upon reflectance confocal microscopy examination in a large series of cases. Methods: A retrospective analysis on 201 melanomas, evaluated for dermoscopic/confocal criteria of melanoma, was carried out. Results: Twenty-three melanomas out of 201 cases (11.4{\%}) revealed a low 7-point checklist score. On confocal examination, 22 out of 23 lesions have been diagnosed correctly as melanomas. Only 1 lesion did not display melanoma features, neither upon dermoscopy nor upon confocal microscopy examination. Seven lesions out of 201 cases (3.5{\%}) were judged as negative on confocal examination, even if 6 of them were diagnosed as melanomas by clinical and/or dermoscopic evaluation. After histopathological revision, these cases were grouped into 5 categories: (1) amelanotic melanoma (n = 1), (2) hyperkeratotic melanomas (n = 2), (3) lentiginous melanomas (n = 2), (4) melanoma with small pagetoid cells (n = 1), (5) spitzoid melanoma (n = 1). Conclusion: Confocal and dermoscopic examination, along with patient-related information and clinical history, can lead to an optimal patient management.",
keywords = "Confocal microscopy, Dermoscopy, Histopathology#, Melanoma, Nevi, Skin cancer",
author = "Valeria Coco and Francesca Farnetani and Cesinaro, {Anna Maria} and Silvana Ciardo and Giuseppe Argenziano and Ketty Peris and Giovanni Pellacani and Caterina Longo",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000443637",
language = "English",
pages = "189--97",
journal = "Dermatology",
issn = "1018-8665",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - False-Negative Cases on Confocal Microscopy Examination

T2 - A Retrospective Evaluation and Critical Reappraisal

AU - Coco, Valeria

AU - Farnetani, Francesca

AU - Cesinaro, Anna Maria

AU - Ciardo, Silvana

AU - Argenziano, Giuseppe

AU - Peris, Ketty

AU - Pellacani, Giovanni

AU - Longo, Caterina

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Background: Confocal microscopy is a second-level examination for dermoscopically equivocal melanocytic lesions. However, the number of false-negative cases on confocal microscopy and the scenarios in which confocal microscopy may fail have not been fully elucidated. Objective: To calculate the percentage of false-negative melanomas upon reflectance confocal microscopy examination in a large series of cases. Methods: A retrospective analysis on 201 melanomas, evaluated for dermoscopic/confocal criteria of melanoma, was carried out. Results: Twenty-three melanomas out of 201 cases (11.4%) revealed a low 7-point checklist score. On confocal examination, 22 out of 23 lesions have been diagnosed correctly as melanomas. Only 1 lesion did not display melanoma features, neither upon dermoscopy nor upon confocal microscopy examination. Seven lesions out of 201 cases (3.5%) were judged as negative on confocal examination, even if 6 of them were diagnosed as melanomas by clinical and/or dermoscopic evaluation. After histopathological revision, these cases were grouped into 5 categories: (1) amelanotic melanoma (n = 1), (2) hyperkeratotic melanomas (n = 2), (3) lentiginous melanomas (n = 2), (4) melanoma with small pagetoid cells (n = 1), (5) spitzoid melanoma (n = 1). Conclusion: Confocal and dermoscopic examination, along with patient-related information and clinical history, can lead to an optimal patient management.

AB - Background: Confocal microscopy is a second-level examination for dermoscopically equivocal melanocytic lesions. However, the number of false-negative cases on confocal microscopy and the scenarios in which confocal microscopy may fail have not been fully elucidated. Objective: To calculate the percentage of false-negative melanomas upon reflectance confocal microscopy examination in a large series of cases. Methods: A retrospective analysis on 201 melanomas, evaluated for dermoscopic/confocal criteria of melanoma, was carried out. Results: Twenty-three melanomas out of 201 cases (11.4%) revealed a low 7-point checklist score. On confocal examination, 22 out of 23 lesions have been diagnosed correctly as melanomas. Only 1 lesion did not display melanoma features, neither upon dermoscopy nor upon confocal microscopy examination. Seven lesions out of 201 cases (3.5%) were judged as negative on confocal examination, even if 6 of them were diagnosed as melanomas by clinical and/or dermoscopic evaluation. After histopathological revision, these cases were grouped into 5 categories: (1) amelanotic melanoma (n = 1), (2) hyperkeratotic melanomas (n = 2), (3) lentiginous melanomas (n = 2), (4) melanoma with small pagetoid cells (n = 1), (5) spitzoid melanoma (n = 1). Conclusion: Confocal and dermoscopic examination, along with patient-related information and clinical history, can lead to an optimal patient management.

KW - Confocal microscopy

KW - Dermoscopy

KW - Histopathology#

KW - Melanoma

KW - Nevi

KW - Skin cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957900202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957900202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000443637

DO - 10.1159/000443637

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84957900202

SP - 189

EP - 197

JO - Dermatology

JF - Dermatology

SN - 1018-8665

ER -