Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions

S. Bastianello, A. Bozzao, A. Paolillo, E. Giugni, C. Gasperini, T. Koudriavtseva, E. Millefiorini, M. A. Horsfield, C. Colonnese, D. Toni, M. Fiorelli, C. Pozzilli, L. Bozzao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare fast spin-echo (FSE) and fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences with conventional spin-echo (CSE) MR imaging in the quantification of the number and volume of multiple sclerosis lesions. METHODS: In 30 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, we calculated the total number and volume of lesions detected with each of the three sequences using a semiautomated program. RESULTS: On CSE sequences, we calculated a total of 2583 lesions with a global volume of 836.3 cm3. With FSE sequences, we observed a 16% relative reduction in the number of lesions detected and a 25% relative reduction in global volume as compared with CSE. With fast FLAIR sequences, we detected a significantly lower number and volume of infratentorial lesions, whereas at the cortical/subcortical level the lesions were both more numerous and bulkier than on CSE sequences. Finally, we observed a higher lesion/white matter contrast, a significant reduction in time required for the quantification colesion load, and a very low interobserver variability in favor of fast FLAIR sequences. CONCLUSION: Despite its limitations in the detection of infratentorial lesions, the fast FLAIR sequence in conjunction with a semiautomated quantification program provides a reliable means to evaluate the total lesion burden in patients with MS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)699-704
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume18
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1997

Fingerprint

Sequence Inversion
Multiple Sclerosis
Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Observer Variation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance, technique
  • Sclerosis, multiple

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions. / Bastianello, S.; Bozzao, A.; Paolillo, A.; Giugni, E.; Gasperini, C.; Koudriavtseva, T.; Millefiorini, E.; Horsfield, M. A.; Colonnese, C.; Toni, D.; Fiorelli, M.; Pozzilli, C.; Bozzao, L.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 04.1997, p. 699-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bastianello, S, Bozzao, A, Paolillo, A, Giugni, E, Gasperini, C, Koudriavtseva, T, Millefiorini, E, Horsfield, MA, Colonnese, C, Toni, D, Fiorelli, M, Pozzilli, C & Bozzao, L 1997, 'Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions', American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 699-704.
Bastianello, S. ; Bozzao, A. ; Paolillo, A. ; Giugni, E. ; Gasperini, C. ; Koudriavtseva, T. ; Millefiorini, E. ; Horsfield, M. A. ; Colonnese, C. ; Toni, D. ; Fiorelli, M. ; Pozzilli, C. ; Bozzao, L. / Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions. In: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1997 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 699-704.
@article{653a5dcb295942388559f24933ba1596,
title = "Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare fast spin-echo (FSE) and fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences with conventional spin-echo (CSE) MR imaging in the quantification of the number and volume of multiple sclerosis lesions. METHODS: In 30 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, we calculated the total number and volume of lesions detected with each of the three sequences using a semiautomated program. RESULTS: On CSE sequences, we calculated a total of 2583 lesions with a global volume of 836.3 cm3. With FSE sequences, we observed a 16{\%} relative reduction in the number of lesions detected and a 25{\%} relative reduction in global volume as compared with CSE. With fast FLAIR sequences, we detected a significantly lower number and volume of infratentorial lesions, whereas at the cortical/subcortical level the lesions were both more numerous and bulkier than on CSE sequences. Finally, we observed a higher lesion/white matter contrast, a significant reduction in time required for the quantification colesion load, and a very low interobserver variability in favor of fast FLAIR sequences. CONCLUSION: Despite its limitations in the detection of infratentorial lesions, the fast FLAIR sequence in conjunction with a semiautomated quantification program provides a reliable means to evaluate the total lesion burden in patients with MS.",
keywords = "Magnetic resonance, technique, Sclerosis, multiple",
author = "S. Bastianello and A. Bozzao and A. Paolillo and E. Giugni and C. Gasperini and T. Koudriavtseva and E. Millefiorini and Horsfield, {M. A.} and C. Colonnese and D. Toni and M. Fiorelli and C. Pozzilli and L. Bozzao",
year = "1997",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "699--704",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions

AU - Bastianello, S.

AU - Bozzao, A.

AU - Paolillo, A.

AU - Giugni, E.

AU - Gasperini, C.

AU - Koudriavtseva, T.

AU - Millefiorini, E.

AU - Horsfield, M. A.

AU - Colonnese, C.

AU - Toni, D.

AU - Fiorelli, M.

AU - Pozzilli, C.

AU - Bozzao, L.

PY - 1997/4

Y1 - 1997/4

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare fast spin-echo (FSE) and fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences with conventional spin-echo (CSE) MR imaging in the quantification of the number and volume of multiple sclerosis lesions. METHODS: In 30 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, we calculated the total number and volume of lesions detected with each of the three sequences using a semiautomated program. RESULTS: On CSE sequences, we calculated a total of 2583 lesions with a global volume of 836.3 cm3. With FSE sequences, we observed a 16% relative reduction in the number of lesions detected and a 25% relative reduction in global volume as compared with CSE. With fast FLAIR sequences, we detected a significantly lower number and volume of infratentorial lesions, whereas at the cortical/subcortical level the lesions were both more numerous and bulkier than on CSE sequences. Finally, we observed a higher lesion/white matter contrast, a significant reduction in time required for the quantification colesion load, and a very low interobserver variability in favor of fast FLAIR sequences. CONCLUSION: Despite its limitations in the detection of infratentorial lesions, the fast FLAIR sequence in conjunction with a semiautomated quantification program provides a reliable means to evaluate the total lesion burden in patients with MS.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare fast spin-echo (FSE) and fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences with conventional spin-echo (CSE) MR imaging in the quantification of the number and volume of multiple sclerosis lesions. METHODS: In 30 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, we calculated the total number and volume of lesions detected with each of the three sequences using a semiautomated program. RESULTS: On CSE sequences, we calculated a total of 2583 lesions with a global volume of 836.3 cm3. With FSE sequences, we observed a 16% relative reduction in the number of lesions detected and a 25% relative reduction in global volume as compared with CSE. With fast FLAIR sequences, we detected a significantly lower number and volume of infratentorial lesions, whereas at the cortical/subcortical level the lesions were both more numerous and bulkier than on CSE sequences. Finally, we observed a higher lesion/white matter contrast, a significant reduction in time required for the quantification colesion load, and a very low interobserver variability in favor of fast FLAIR sequences. CONCLUSION: Despite its limitations in the detection of infratentorial lesions, the fast FLAIR sequence in conjunction with a semiautomated quantification program provides a reliable means to evaluate the total lesion burden in patients with MS.

KW - Magnetic resonance, technique

KW - Sclerosis, multiple

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030944086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030944086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9127033

AN - SCOPUS:0030944086

VL - 18

SP - 699

EP - 704

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 4

ER -