Field dependence–independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation

Alice Teghil, Maddalena Boccia, Cecilia Guariglia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Field dependence–independence (FDI) is a stable dimension of individual functioning, transversal to different cognitive domains. While the role of some individual variables in time perception has received considerable attention, it is not clear whether and how FDI influences timing abilities. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that FDI differently affects timing performance depending on whether the task requires cognitive restructuring. Participants were assessed for FDI using the embedded figures test (EFT). They performed a prospective timing task, reproducing the duration of a flickering stimulus, and a retrospective timing task, estimating the duration of the task. We expected performance of field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FI) individuals not to differ in the prospective task, since restructuring of task material is not needed to reproduce the stimulus duration. Conversely, we predicted that FI individuals should be more accurate than FD ones in the retrospective condition, involving restructuring skills. Results show that while both FD and FI individuals under-reproduced the stimulus duration in the prospective task, only FD participants significantly underestimated the duration of the timing task in the retrospective condition. These results suggest that differences across FD and FI individuals are apparent in timing only when the task requires high-level cognitive processing; conversely, these differences do not affect basic sensory processing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1019-1029
Number of pages11
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume237
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 8 2019

Fingerprint

Time Perception
Aptitude
Dilatation

Keywords

  • Cognitive style
  • Field dependence
  • Interval reproduction
  • Retrospective time estimation
  • Time perception
  • Timing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Field dependence–independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation. / Teghil, Alice; Boccia, Maddalena; Guariglia, Cecilia.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 237, No. 4, 08.04.2019, p. 1019-1029.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4690c86909ae410fb8cdd0c4fa30c8b1,
title = "Field dependence–independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation",
abstract = "Field dependence–independence (FDI) is a stable dimension of individual functioning, transversal to different cognitive domains. While the role of some individual variables in time perception has received considerable attention, it is not clear whether and how FDI influences timing abilities. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that FDI differently affects timing performance depending on whether the task requires cognitive restructuring. Participants were assessed for FDI using the embedded figures test (EFT). They performed a prospective timing task, reproducing the duration of a flickering stimulus, and a retrospective timing task, estimating the duration of the task. We expected performance of field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FI) individuals not to differ in the prospective task, since restructuring of task material is not needed to reproduce the stimulus duration. Conversely, we predicted that FI individuals should be more accurate than FD ones in the retrospective condition, involving restructuring skills. Results show that while both FD and FI individuals under-reproduced the stimulus duration in the prospective task, only FD participants significantly underestimated the duration of the timing task in the retrospective condition. These results suggest that differences across FD and FI individuals are apparent in timing only when the task requires high-level cognitive processing; conversely, these differences do not affect basic sensory processing.",
keywords = "Cognitive style, Field dependence, Interval reproduction, Retrospective time estimation, Time perception, Timing",
author = "Alice Teghil and Maddalena Boccia and Cecilia Guariglia",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-019-05485-3",
language = "English",
volume = "237",
pages = "1019--1029",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field dependence–independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation

AU - Teghil, Alice

AU - Boccia, Maddalena

AU - Guariglia, Cecilia

PY - 2019/4/8

Y1 - 2019/4/8

N2 - Field dependence–independence (FDI) is a stable dimension of individual functioning, transversal to different cognitive domains. While the role of some individual variables in time perception has received considerable attention, it is not clear whether and how FDI influences timing abilities. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that FDI differently affects timing performance depending on whether the task requires cognitive restructuring. Participants were assessed for FDI using the embedded figures test (EFT). They performed a prospective timing task, reproducing the duration of a flickering stimulus, and a retrospective timing task, estimating the duration of the task. We expected performance of field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FI) individuals not to differ in the prospective task, since restructuring of task material is not needed to reproduce the stimulus duration. Conversely, we predicted that FI individuals should be more accurate than FD ones in the retrospective condition, involving restructuring skills. Results show that while both FD and FI individuals under-reproduced the stimulus duration in the prospective task, only FD participants significantly underestimated the duration of the timing task in the retrospective condition. These results suggest that differences across FD and FI individuals are apparent in timing only when the task requires high-level cognitive processing; conversely, these differences do not affect basic sensory processing.

AB - Field dependence–independence (FDI) is a stable dimension of individual functioning, transversal to different cognitive domains. While the role of some individual variables in time perception has received considerable attention, it is not clear whether and how FDI influences timing abilities. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that FDI differently affects timing performance depending on whether the task requires cognitive restructuring. Participants were assessed for FDI using the embedded figures test (EFT). They performed a prospective timing task, reproducing the duration of a flickering stimulus, and a retrospective timing task, estimating the duration of the task. We expected performance of field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FI) individuals not to differ in the prospective task, since restructuring of task material is not needed to reproduce the stimulus duration. Conversely, we predicted that FI individuals should be more accurate than FD ones in the retrospective condition, involving restructuring skills. Results show that while both FD and FI individuals under-reproduced the stimulus duration in the prospective task, only FD participants significantly underestimated the duration of the timing task in the retrospective condition. These results suggest that differences across FD and FI individuals are apparent in timing only when the task requires high-level cognitive processing; conversely, these differences do not affect basic sensory processing.

KW - Cognitive style

KW - Field dependence

KW - Interval reproduction

KW - Retrospective time estimation

KW - Time perception

KW - Timing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061304282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061304282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-019-05485-3

DO - 10.1007/s00221-019-05485-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 30729268

AN - SCOPUS:85061304282

VL - 237

SP - 1019

EP - 1029

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 4

ER -