First experiences using reflectance confocal microscopy on equivocal skin lesions in Queensland

Claudia E S Curchin, Elisabeth M T Wurm, Duncan L J Lambie, Caterina Longo, Giovanni Pellacani, H. Peter Soyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive method of imaging human skin in vivo. The purpose of this study was to observe the experience of using RCM on equivocal skin lesions in a tertiary clinical setting in Queensland. Methods: Fifty equivocal lesions on 42 patients were imaged using a reflectance confocal microscope immediately prior to being excised. The images were then analysed blind to the histopathological diagnosis. The experience and problems encountered when using RCM on skin lesions for the first time was also observed. Results: On RCM analysis 12/13 melanomas (92.3% sensitivity, 75% specificity), 19/22 benign naevi (86% sensitivity, 95% specificity), 6/9 basal cell carcinomas (66.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity)and 6/6 squamous cell carcinomas and its precursors (100% sensitivity, 75% specificity) were diagnosed correctly when using histology as the gold standard. We identified three common problems that affected image quality: object artefacts; positioning artefacts; and movement artefacts. Conclusions: Using simple techniques we found that common RCM features were readily identifiable and common artefacts could be minimized, making RCM a useful tool to aid the diagnosis of equivocal skin lesions in a clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-97
Number of pages9
JournalAustralasian Journal of Dermatology
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Queensland
Confocal Microscopy
Artifacts
Skin
Sensitivity and Specificity
Nevus
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Melanoma
Histology

Keywords

  • Artefacts
  • Basal cell carcinoma
  • Image quality
  • In vivo confocal microscopy
  • Melanoma
  • Naevi
  • RCM
  • Reflectance confocal microscopy
  • Squamous cell carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

First experiences using reflectance confocal microscopy on equivocal skin lesions in Queensland. / Curchin, Claudia E S; Wurm, Elisabeth M T; Lambie, Duncan L J; Longo, Caterina; Pellacani, Giovanni; Soyer, H. Peter.

In: Australasian Journal of Dermatology, Vol. 52, No. 2, 05.2011, p. 89-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curchin, Claudia E S ; Wurm, Elisabeth M T ; Lambie, Duncan L J ; Longo, Caterina ; Pellacani, Giovanni ; Soyer, H. Peter. / First experiences using reflectance confocal microscopy on equivocal skin lesions in Queensland. In: Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 2011 ; Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 89-97.
@article{f0fc682ce0cc4e0db1cddc0f7d6b14f3,
title = "First experiences using reflectance confocal microscopy on equivocal skin lesions in Queensland",
abstract = "Background/Objectives: Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive method of imaging human skin in vivo. The purpose of this study was to observe the experience of using RCM on equivocal skin lesions in a tertiary clinical setting in Queensland. Methods: Fifty equivocal lesions on 42 patients were imaged using a reflectance confocal microscope immediately prior to being excised. The images were then analysed blind to the histopathological diagnosis. The experience and problems encountered when using RCM on skin lesions for the first time was also observed. Results: On RCM analysis 12/13 melanomas (92.3{\%} sensitivity, 75{\%} specificity), 19/22 benign naevi (86{\%} sensitivity, 95{\%} specificity), 6/9 basal cell carcinomas (66.7{\%} sensitivity, 100{\%} specificity)and 6/6 squamous cell carcinomas and its precursors (100{\%} sensitivity, 75{\%} specificity) were diagnosed correctly when using histology as the gold standard. We identified three common problems that affected image quality: object artefacts; positioning artefacts; and movement artefacts. Conclusions: Using simple techniques we found that common RCM features were readily identifiable and common artefacts could be minimized, making RCM a useful tool to aid the diagnosis of equivocal skin lesions in a clinical setting.",
keywords = "Artefacts, Basal cell carcinoma, Image quality, In vivo confocal microscopy, Melanoma, Naevi, RCM, Reflectance confocal microscopy, Squamous cell carcinoma",
author = "Curchin, {Claudia E S} and Wurm, {Elisabeth M T} and Lambie, {Duncan L J} and Caterina Longo and Giovanni Pellacani and Soyer, {H. Peter}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00756.x",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "89--97",
journal = "Australasian Journal of Dermatology",
issn = "0004-8380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - First experiences using reflectance confocal microscopy on equivocal skin lesions in Queensland

AU - Curchin, Claudia E S

AU - Wurm, Elisabeth M T

AU - Lambie, Duncan L J

AU - Longo, Caterina

AU - Pellacani, Giovanni

AU - Soyer, H. Peter

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Background/Objectives: Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive method of imaging human skin in vivo. The purpose of this study was to observe the experience of using RCM on equivocal skin lesions in a tertiary clinical setting in Queensland. Methods: Fifty equivocal lesions on 42 patients were imaged using a reflectance confocal microscope immediately prior to being excised. The images were then analysed blind to the histopathological diagnosis. The experience and problems encountered when using RCM on skin lesions for the first time was also observed. Results: On RCM analysis 12/13 melanomas (92.3% sensitivity, 75% specificity), 19/22 benign naevi (86% sensitivity, 95% specificity), 6/9 basal cell carcinomas (66.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity)and 6/6 squamous cell carcinomas and its precursors (100% sensitivity, 75% specificity) were diagnosed correctly when using histology as the gold standard. We identified three common problems that affected image quality: object artefacts; positioning artefacts; and movement artefacts. Conclusions: Using simple techniques we found that common RCM features were readily identifiable and common artefacts could be minimized, making RCM a useful tool to aid the diagnosis of equivocal skin lesions in a clinical setting.

AB - Background/Objectives: Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive method of imaging human skin in vivo. The purpose of this study was to observe the experience of using RCM on equivocal skin lesions in a tertiary clinical setting in Queensland. Methods: Fifty equivocal lesions on 42 patients were imaged using a reflectance confocal microscope immediately prior to being excised. The images were then analysed blind to the histopathological diagnosis. The experience and problems encountered when using RCM on skin lesions for the first time was also observed. Results: On RCM analysis 12/13 melanomas (92.3% sensitivity, 75% specificity), 19/22 benign naevi (86% sensitivity, 95% specificity), 6/9 basal cell carcinomas (66.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity)and 6/6 squamous cell carcinomas and its precursors (100% sensitivity, 75% specificity) were diagnosed correctly when using histology as the gold standard. We identified three common problems that affected image quality: object artefacts; positioning artefacts; and movement artefacts. Conclusions: Using simple techniques we found that common RCM features were readily identifiable and common artefacts could be minimized, making RCM a useful tool to aid the diagnosis of equivocal skin lesions in a clinical setting.

KW - Artefacts

KW - Basal cell carcinoma

KW - Image quality

KW - In vivo confocal microscopy

KW - Melanoma

KW - Naevi

KW - RCM

KW - Reflectance confocal microscopy

KW - Squamous cell carcinoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958232065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958232065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00756.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00756.x

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 89

EP - 97

JO - Australasian Journal of Dermatology

JF - Australasian Journal of Dermatology

SN - 0004-8380

IS - 2

ER -