First the nose, last the eyes in congenital prosopagnosia: Look like your father looks

Maria De Luca, Maria Rosa Pizzamiglio, Antonella Di Vita, Liana Palermo, Antonio Tanzilli, Claudia Dacquino, Laura Piccardi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To contribute to the limited body of eye movement (EM) studies of children and family members with congenital prosopagnosia (CP), a task requiring a verbal response for the identification of personally familiar faces was used for the 1st time. Method: EMs were recorded in a father and his son (both diagnosed with CP) and controls (N = 2). In the identification tasks they watched personally familiar faces and distracters and responded by saying the names of the familiar faces or saying "I don't know." Two discrimination tasks were added to distinguish the specificity of the EM pattern for the recognition tasks. In all tasks, faces were presented 1 by 1 until the response onset; thus, the EM pattern was not saturated by overexposure to the stimulus. The 1st fixation position was examined to localize the 1st area of the face attended to. The spatial-temporal fixation pattern was examined to evaluate the attention devoted to specific regions. Results: Both family members were inaccurate and slower than controls in the identification but not the discrimination tasks. In all tasks, they made a number of fixations comparable to those of controls but showed longer fixation durations than controls did. In the identification tasks, they showed poor spatial-temporal distribution of fixations on the eyes and rare 1st fixations on the eyes. Conclusions: Consistent with the literature, both family members showed the typical reduced sampling of the eyes. Nevertheless, our protocol based on explicit verbal responses (which included EM only until response onset) showed that they did not increase the spatial sampling overall by making more fixations than controls did. Instead, they showed longer fixation durations across tasks; this was interpreted as a generalized problem with face processing in affording a more robust sampling of information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)855-861
Number of pages7
JournalNeuropsychology
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Nose
Fathers
Eye Movements
Nuclear Family
Names
Hereditary Prosopagnosia

Keywords

  • Congenital prosopagnosia
  • Developmental prosopagnosia
  • Eye movements
  • Familiar face recognition
  • First fixation position

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

First the nose, last the eyes in congenital prosopagnosia : Look like your father looks. / De Luca, Maria; Pizzamiglio, Maria Rosa; Di Vita, Antonella; Palermo, Liana; Tanzilli, Antonio; Dacquino, Claudia; Piccardi, Laura.

In: Neuropsychology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.09.2019, p. 855-861.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Luca, Maria ; Pizzamiglio, Maria Rosa ; Di Vita, Antonella ; Palermo, Liana ; Tanzilli, Antonio ; Dacquino, Claudia ; Piccardi, Laura. / First the nose, last the eyes in congenital prosopagnosia : Look like your father looks. In: Neuropsychology. 2019 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 855-861.
@article{6b73d6e2b0fa4d5593c25428e3798523,
title = "First the nose, last the eyes in congenital prosopagnosia: Look like your father looks",
abstract = "Objective: To contribute to the limited body of eye movement (EM) studies of children and family members with congenital prosopagnosia (CP), a task requiring a verbal response for the identification of personally familiar faces was used for the 1st time. Method: EMs were recorded in a father and his son (both diagnosed with CP) and controls (N = 2). In the identification tasks they watched personally familiar faces and distracters and responded by saying the names of the familiar faces or saying {"}I don't know.{"} Two discrimination tasks were added to distinguish the specificity of the EM pattern for the recognition tasks. In all tasks, faces were presented 1 by 1 until the response onset; thus, the EM pattern was not saturated by overexposure to the stimulus. The 1st fixation position was examined to localize the 1st area of the face attended to. The spatial-temporal fixation pattern was examined to evaluate the attention devoted to specific regions. Results: Both family members were inaccurate and slower than controls in the identification but not the discrimination tasks. In all tasks, they made a number of fixations comparable to those of controls but showed longer fixation durations than controls did. In the identification tasks, they showed poor spatial-temporal distribution of fixations on the eyes and rare 1st fixations on the eyes. Conclusions: Consistent with the literature, both family members showed the typical reduced sampling of the eyes. Nevertheless, our protocol based on explicit verbal responses (which included EM only until response onset) showed that they did not increase the spatial sampling overall by making more fixations than controls did. Instead, they showed longer fixation durations across tasks; this was interpreted as a generalized problem with face processing in affording a more robust sampling of information.",
keywords = "Congenital prosopagnosia, Developmental prosopagnosia, Eye movements, Familiar face recognition, First fixation position",
author = "{De Luca}, Maria and Pizzamiglio, {Maria Rosa} and {Di Vita}, Antonella and Liana Palermo and Antonio Tanzilli and Claudia Dacquino and Laura Piccardi",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/neu0000556",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "855--861",
journal = "Neuropsychology",
issn = "0894-4105",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - First the nose, last the eyes in congenital prosopagnosia

T2 - Look like your father looks

AU - De Luca, Maria

AU - Pizzamiglio, Maria Rosa

AU - Di Vita, Antonella

AU - Palermo, Liana

AU - Tanzilli, Antonio

AU - Dacquino, Claudia

AU - Piccardi, Laura

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Objective: To contribute to the limited body of eye movement (EM) studies of children and family members with congenital prosopagnosia (CP), a task requiring a verbal response for the identification of personally familiar faces was used for the 1st time. Method: EMs were recorded in a father and his son (both diagnosed with CP) and controls (N = 2). In the identification tasks they watched personally familiar faces and distracters and responded by saying the names of the familiar faces or saying "I don't know." Two discrimination tasks were added to distinguish the specificity of the EM pattern for the recognition tasks. In all tasks, faces were presented 1 by 1 until the response onset; thus, the EM pattern was not saturated by overexposure to the stimulus. The 1st fixation position was examined to localize the 1st area of the face attended to. The spatial-temporal fixation pattern was examined to evaluate the attention devoted to specific regions. Results: Both family members were inaccurate and slower than controls in the identification but not the discrimination tasks. In all tasks, they made a number of fixations comparable to those of controls but showed longer fixation durations than controls did. In the identification tasks, they showed poor spatial-temporal distribution of fixations on the eyes and rare 1st fixations on the eyes. Conclusions: Consistent with the literature, both family members showed the typical reduced sampling of the eyes. Nevertheless, our protocol based on explicit verbal responses (which included EM only until response onset) showed that they did not increase the spatial sampling overall by making more fixations than controls did. Instead, they showed longer fixation durations across tasks; this was interpreted as a generalized problem with face processing in affording a more robust sampling of information.

AB - Objective: To contribute to the limited body of eye movement (EM) studies of children and family members with congenital prosopagnosia (CP), a task requiring a verbal response for the identification of personally familiar faces was used for the 1st time. Method: EMs were recorded in a father and his son (both diagnosed with CP) and controls (N = 2). In the identification tasks they watched personally familiar faces and distracters and responded by saying the names of the familiar faces or saying "I don't know." Two discrimination tasks were added to distinguish the specificity of the EM pattern for the recognition tasks. In all tasks, faces were presented 1 by 1 until the response onset; thus, the EM pattern was not saturated by overexposure to the stimulus. The 1st fixation position was examined to localize the 1st area of the face attended to. The spatial-temporal fixation pattern was examined to evaluate the attention devoted to specific regions. Results: Both family members were inaccurate and slower than controls in the identification but not the discrimination tasks. In all tasks, they made a number of fixations comparable to those of controls but showed longer fixation durations than controls did. In the identification tasks, they showed poor spatial-temporal distribution of fixations on the eyes and rare 1st fixations on the eyes. Conclusions: Consistent with the literature, both family members showed the typical reduced sampling of the eyes. Nevertheless, our protocol based on explicit verbal responses (which included EM only until response onset) showed that they did not increase the spatial sampling overall by making more fixations than controls did. Instead, they showed longer fixation durations across tasks; this was interpreted as a generalized problem with face processing in affording a more robust sampling of information.

KW - Congenital prosopagnosia

KW - Developmental prosopagnosia

KW - Eye movements

KW - Familiar face recognition

KW - First fixation position

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065604294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065604294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/neu0000556

DO - 10.1037/neu0000556

M3 - Article

C2 - 31094554

AN - SCOPUS:85065604294

VL - 33

SP - 855

EP - 861

JO - Neuropsychology

JF - Neuropsychology

SN - 0894-4105

IS - 6

ER -