Five fully automated methods for performing immature reticulocyte fraction: Comparison in diagnosis of bone marrow aplasia

Mauro Buttarello, Pietro Bulian, Giorgio Farina, Maria Grazia Petris, Valeria Temporin, Lucia Toffolo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We performed a parallel evaluation of 5 automated reticulocyte counters to produce the immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF). We analyzed 225 samples from healthy control subjects, 115from patients with various diseases, 38 with advanced aplasia, and 22 in early erythropoietic recovery after chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. The reference intervals were different for each instrument (ADVIA 120, 0.04-0.25; CELL DYN 4000, 0.15-0.35; GEN-S, 0.20-0.37; SE 9500 RET, 0.05-0.21; VEGA RETIC: 0.06-0.23). The imprecision, obtained by 1-way analysis of variance on duplicates, was satisfactory for clinical use for all methods (coefficient of variation, 7.6%-20.5% in healthy subjects), although it was higher than the analytic goal based on biologic variability within subjects. The comparison of different methods shows that agreement is good only between SE 9500 RET, CELL DYN 4000, and VEGA RETIC (r2 = 0.72-0.78). The study of diagnostic performance in distinguishing aplasia from early bone marrow recovery shows slightly different results (area under the curve from 0.70 for ADVIA 120 to 0.96 for SE 9500 RET). Even with slight differences, the fluorescence-based methods seem to be more robust than other methods for IRF measurement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)871-879
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology
Volume117
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Reticulocytes
Bone Marrow
Healthy Volunteers
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Area Under Curve
Analysis of Variance
Fluorescence
Drug Therapy

Keywords

  • Automated analyzers
  • Bone marrow aplasia
  • Immature reticulocyte fraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Five fully automated methods for performing immature reticulocyte fraction : Comparison in diagnosis of bone marrow aplasia. / Buttarello, Mauro; Bulian, Pietro; Farina, Giorgio; Petris, Maria Grazia; Temporin, Valeria; Toffolo, Lucia.

In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 117, No. 6, 2002, p. 871-879.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buttarello, Mauro ; Bulian, Pietro ; Farina, Giorgio ; Petris, Maria Grazia ; Temporin, Valeria ; Toffolo, Lucia. / Five fully automated methods for performing immature reticulocyte fraction : Comparison in diagnosis of bone marrow aplasia. In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2002 ; Vol. 117, No. 6. pp. 871-879.
@article{cee3b5c5e3bd4bccb39ae40f0b56ecd4,
title = "Five fully automated methods for performing immature reticulocyte fraction: Comparison in diagnosis of bone marrow aplasia",
abstract = "We performed a parallel evaluation of 5 automated reticulocyte counters to produce the immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF). We analyzed 225 samples from healthy control subjects, 115from patients with various diseases, 38 with advanced aplasia, and 22 in early erythropoietic recovery after chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. The reference intervals were different for each instrument (ADVIA 120, 0.04-0.25; CELL DYN 4000, 0.15-0.35; GEN-S, 0.20-0.37; SE 9500 RET, 0.05-0.21; VEGA RETIC: 0.06-0.23). The imprecision, obtained by 1-way analysis of variance on duplicates, was satisfactory for clinical use for all methods (coefficient of variation, 7.6{\%}-20.5{\%} in healthy subjects), although it was higher than the analytic goal based on biologic variability within subjects. The comparison of different methods shows that agreement is good only between SE 9500 RET, CELL DYN 4000, and VEGA RETIC (r2 = 0.72-0.78). The study of diagnostic performance in distinguishing aplasia from early bone marrow recovery shows slightly different results (area under the curve from 0.70 for ADVIA 120 to 0.96 for SE 9500 RET). Even with slight differences, the fluorescence-based methods seem to be more robust than other methods for IRF measurement.",
keywords = "Automated analyzers, Bone marrow aplasia, Immature reticulocyte fraction",
author = "Mauro Buttarello and Pietro Bulian and Giorgio Farina and Petris, {Maria Grazia} and Valeria Temporin and Lucia Toffolo",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1309/VJAA-L52P-FGRM-QGRU",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "871--879",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0002-9173",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Pathologists",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five fully automated methods for performing immature reticulocyte fraction

T2 - Comparison in diagnosis of bone marrow aplasia

AU - Buttarello, Mauro

AU - Bulian, Pietro

AU - Farina, Giorgio

AU - Petris, Maria Grazia

AU - Temporin, Valeria

AU - Toffolo, Lucia

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - We performed a parallel evaluation of 5 automated reticulocyte counters to produce the immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF). We analyzed 225 samples from healthy control subjects, 115from patients with various diseases, 38 with advanced aplasia, and 22 in early erythropoietic recovery after chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. The reference intervals were different for each instrument (ADVIA 120, 0.04-0.25; CELL DYN 4000, 0.15-0.35; GEN-S, 0.20-0.37; SE 9500 RET, 0.05-0.21; VEGA RETIC: 0.06-0.23). The imprecision, obtained by 1-way analysis of variance on duplicates, was satisfactory for clinical use for all methods (coefficient of variation, 7.6%-20.5% in healthy subjects), although it was higher than the analytic goal based on biologic variability within subjects. The comparison of different methods shows that agreement is good only between SE 9500 RET, CELL DYN 4000, and VEGA RETIC (r2 = 0.72-0.78). The study of diagnostic performance in distinguishing aplasia from early bone marrow recovery shows slightly different results (area under the curve from 0.70 for ADVIA 120 to 0.96 for SE 9500 RET). Even with slight differences, the fluorescence-based methods seem to be more robust than other methods for IRF measurement.

AB - We performed a parallel evaluation of 5 automated reticulocyte counters to produce the immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF). We analyzed 225 samples from healthy control subjects, 115from patients with various diseases, 38 with advanced aplasia, and 22 in early erythropoietic recovery after chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. The reference intervals were different for each instrument (ADVIA 120, 0.04-0.25; CELL DYN 4000, 0.15-0.35; GEN-S, 0.20-0.37; SE 9500 RET, 0.05-0.21; VEGA RETIC: 0.06-0.23). The imprecision, obtained by 1-way analysis of variance on duplicates, was satisfactory for clinical use for all methods (coefficient of variation, 7.6%-20.5% in healthy subjects), although it was higher than the analytic goal based on biologic variability within subjects. The comparison of different methods shows that agreement is good only between SE 9500 RET, CELL DYN 4000, and VEGA RETIC (r2 = 0.72-0.78). The study of diagnostic performance in distinguishing aplasia from early bone marrow recovery shows slightly different results (area under the curve from 0.70 for ADVIA 120 to 0.96 for SE 9500 RET). Even with slight differences, the fluorescence-based methods seem to be more robust than other methods for IRF measurement.

KW - Automated analyzers

KW - Bone marrow aplasia

KW - Immature reticulocyte fraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036261376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036261376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1309/VJAA-L52P-FGRM-QGRU

DO - 10.1309/VJAA-L52P-FGRM-QGRU

M3 - Article

C2 - 12047138

AN - SCOPUS:0036261376

VL - 117

SP - 871

EP - 879

JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

SN - 0002-9173

IS - 6

ER -