Five Years of Journal Clubs With Pediatric Nurses and Allied Health Professionals: A Retrospective Study and Satisfaction Survey

Immacolata Dall'Oglio, Valentina Vanzi, Emanuela Tiozzo, Orsola Gawronski, Valentina Biagioli, Serena Tucci, Massimiliano Raponi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: Journal Clubs (JCs) for nurses and allied health professionals have been held in an Italian pediatric hospital since April 2008. This study aimed to: examine what type of articles have been used during JCs across 5years; investigate the potential implications for clinical and organizational practice; assess the participants' satisfaction about JCs and their contribution to professional development.

DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a retrospective design, all articles proposed in the JCs were examined. Specific criteria were used to evaluate the implications for practice within the hospital, which were classified as direct or indirect. Using a cross-sectional design, 63 JCs participants were asked to express their opinion and satisfaction about the JC sessions attended.

RESULTS: Overall, 132 articles were analyzed: most of them focused on pediatric care (64.4%) and nursing (96.2%). Almost half of the articles (n=60, 45.6%) were appraised as having brought implications for clinical practice, both direct (58.3%) and indirect (41.7%). Forty-one participants (12 attendees; 29 active participants) completed a questionnaire about their opinion about JCs. Most of participants (80.5%) reported that the topics selected for the JCs were interesting and relevant to their everyday practice.

CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary JCs were considered useful for clinical practice, improvement of the quality of care, and professional development. However, lack of pragmatism and the difficulty to bridge the gap between research and practice were reported as weaknesses.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: JCs can represent a quality improvement strategy for promoting research utilization among health professionals and thereby improving the quality of care.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatric Nursing
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Mar 15 2018

Fingerprint

Allied Health Personnel
Quality of Health Care
Retrospective Studies
Pediatric Hospitals
Nursing Care
Quality Improvement
Research
Nurses
Pediatrics
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pediatric Nurses

Cite this

@article{793e006497b64b62910d92d83933aae4,
title = "Five Years of Journal Clubs With Pediatric Nurses and Allied Health Professionals: A Retrospective Study and Satisfaction Survey",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Journal Clubs (JCs) for nurses and allied health professionals have been held in an Italian pediatric hospital since April 2008. This study aimed to: examine what type of articles have been used during JCs across 5years; investigate the potential implications for clinical and organizational practice; assess the participants' satisfaction about JCs and their contribution to professional development.DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a retrospective design, all articles proposed in the JCs were examined. Specific criteria were used to evaluate the implications for practice within the hospital, which were classified as direct or indirect. Using a cross-sectional design, 63 JCs participants were asked to express their opinion and satisfaction about the JC sessions attended.RESULTS: Overall, 132 articles were analyzed: most of them focused on pediatric care (64.4{\%}) and nursing (96.2{\%}). Almost half of the articles (n=60, 45.6{\%}) were appraised as having brought implications for clinical practice, both direct (58.3{\%}) and indirect (41.7{\%}). Forty-one participants (12 attendees; 29 active participants) completed a questionnaire about their opinion about JCs. Most of participants (80.5{\%}) reported that the topics selected for the JCs were interesting and relevant to their everyday practice.CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary JCs were considered useful for clinical practice, improvement of the quality of care, and professional development. However, lack of pragmatism and the difficulty to bridge the gap between research and practice were reported as weaknesses.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: JCs can represent a quality improvement strategy for promoting research utilization among health professionals and thereby improving the quality of care.",
author = "Immacolata Dall'Oglio and Valentina Vanzi and Emanuela Tiozzo and Orsola Gawronski and Valentina Biagioli and Serena Tucci and Massimiliano Raponi",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.pedn.2018.03.003",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Nursing",
issn = "0882-5963",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five Years of Journal Clubs With Pediatric Nurses and Allied Health Professionals

T2 - A Retrospective Study and Satisfaction Survey

AU - Dall'Oglio, Immacolata

AU - Vanzi, Valentina

AU - Tiozzo, Emanuela

AU - Gawronski, Orsola

AU - Biagioli, Valentina

AU - Tucci, Serena

AU - Raponi, Massimiliano

N1 - Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2018/3/15

Y1 - 2018/3/15

N2 - PURPOSE: Journal Clubs (JCs) for nurses and allied health professionals have been held in an Italian pediatric hospital since April 2008. This study aimed to: examine what type of articles have been used during JCs across 5years; investigate the potential implications for clinical and organizational practice; assess the participants' satisfaction about JCs and their contribution to professional development.DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a retrospective design, all articles proposed in the JCs were examined. Specific criteria were used to evaluate the implications for practice within the hospital, which were classified as direct or indirect. Using a cross-sectional design, 63 JCs participants were asked to express their opinion and satisfaction about the JC sessions attended.RESULTS: Overall, 132 articles were analyzed: most of them focused on pediatric care (64.4%) and nursing (96.2%). Almost half of the articles (n=60, 45.6%) were appraised as having brought implications for clinical practice, both direct (58.3%) and indirect (41.7%). Forty-one participants (12 attendees; 29 active participants) completed a questionnaire about their opinion about JCs. Most of participants (80.5%) reported that the topics selected for the JCs were interesting and relevant to their everyday practice.CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary JCs were considered useful for clinical practice, improvement of the quality of care, and professional development. However, lack of pragmatism and the difficulty to bridge the gap between research and practice were reported as weaknesses.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: JCs can represent a quality improvement strategy for promoting research utilization among health professionals and thereby improving the quality of care.

AB - PURPOSE: Journal Clubs (JCs) for nurses and allied health professionals have been held in an Italian pediatric hospital since April 2008. This study aimed to: examine what type of articles have been used during JCs across 5years; investigate the potential implications for clinical and organizational practice; assess the participants' satisfaction about JCs and their contribution to professional development.DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a retrospective design, all articles proposed in the JCs were examined. Specific criteria were used to evaluate the implications for practice within the hospital, which were classified as direct or indirect. Using a cross-sectional design, 63 JCs participants were asked to express their opinion and satisfaction about the JC sessions attended.RESULTS: Overall, 132 articles were analyzed: most of them focused on pediatric care (64.4%) and nursing (96.2%). Almost half of the articles (n=60, 45.6%) were appraised as having brought implications for clinical practice, both direct (58.3%) and indirect (41.7%). Forty-one participants (12 attendees; 29 active participants) completed a questionnaire about their opinion about JCs. Most of participants (80.5%) reported that the topics selected for the JCs were interesting and relevant to their everyday practice.CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary JCs were considered useful for clinical practice, improvement of the quality of care, and professional development. However, lack of pragmatism and the difficulty to bridge the gap between research and practice were reported as weaknesses.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: JCs can represent a quality improvement strategy for promoting research utilization among health professionals and thereby improving the quality of care.

U2 - 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.03.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 29551233

JO - Journal of Pediatric Nursing

JF - Journal of Pediatric Nursing

SN - 0882-5963

ER -