Abstract
The purpose of this study was to comparatively measure the bone-pin interface strength in two types of hydroxyapatite-coated pins that differed in shape, diameter, and implantation technique. Both pin types are commonly used for tibia fixation. Thirty bicylindrical 5/4-mm stainless-steel pins (Group A) and 30 tapered 6/5-mm stainless-steel pins (Group B) were implanted in the left tibiae of 10 adult sheep. A monolateral fixator was mounted on the pins after implantation. A 5-mm-long bone segment was removed from the tibial mid-diaphysis to ensure high load at the bone-pin interface. Pin insertion torque was 830 ± 446 N/mm in Group A and 3415 ± 743 N/mm in Group B (p
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-64 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Biomedical Materials Research |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Bicylindrical pins
- External fixation
- Hydroxyapatite
- Stainless steel
- Tapered pins
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biomedical Engineering
- Biomaterials
Cite this
Fixation strength of tapered versus bicylindrical hydroxyapatite-coated external fixation pins : An animal study. / Moroni, Antonio; Faldini, Cesare; Pegreffi, Francesco; Giannini, Sandro.
In: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2002, p. 61-64.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Fixation strength of tapered versus bicylindrical hydroxyapatite-coated external fixation pins
T2 - An animal study
AU - Moroni, Antonio
AU - Faldini, Cesare
AU - Pegreffi, Francesco
AU - Giannini, Sandro
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - The purpose of this study was to comparatively measure the bone-pin interface strength in two types of hydroxyapatite-coated pins that differed in shape, diameter, and implantation technique. Both pin types are commonly used for tibia fixation. Thirty bicylindrical 5/4-mm stainless-steel pins (Group A) and 30 tapered 6/5-mm stainless-steel pins (Group B) were implanted in the left tibiae of 10 adult sheep. A monolateral fixator was mounted on the pins after implantation. A 5-mm-long bone segment was removed from the tibial mid-diaphysis to ensure high load at the bone-pin interface. Pin insertion torque was 830 ± 446 N/mm in Group A and 3415 ± 743 N/mm in Group B (p
AB - The purpose of this study was to comparatively measure the bone-pin interface strength in two types of hydroxyapatite-coated pins that differed in shape, diameter, and implantation technique. Both pin types are commonly used for tibia fixation. Thirty bicylindrical 5/4-mm stainless-steel pins (Group A) and 30 tapered 6/5-mm stainless-steel pins (Group B) were implanted in the left tibiae of 10 adult sheep. A monolateral fixator was mounted on the pins after implantation. A 5-mm-long bone segment was removed from the tibial mid-diaphysis to ensure high load at the bone-pin interface. Pin insertion torque was 830 ± 446 N/mm in Group A and 3415 ± 743 N/mm in Group B (p
KW - Bicylindrical pins
KW - External fixation
KW - Hydroxyapatite
KW - Stainless steel
KW - Tapered pins
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036151486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036151486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jbm.10088
DO - 10.1002/jbm.10088
M3 - Article
C2 - 11787030
AN - SCOPUS:0036151486
VL - 63
SP - 61
EP - 64
JO - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A
JF - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A
SN - 1549-3296
IS - 1
ER -