Focus sulla valutazione del rischio negli ambienti sanitari

Risultati e prospettive di un gruppo di lavoro multicentrico

Translated title of the contribution: Focus on the risk assessment of healthcare environments: Results and perspective of a multicenter working group

R. Polato, M. Bacis, L. Belotti, N. Biggi, M. Campagna, P. Carrer, L. Cologni, V. Gattini, V. Lodi, N. Magnavita, G. Micheloni, C. Negro, D. Placidi, V. Puro, F. Tonelli, S. Porru

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The hospital risk assessment (VdR) is certainly a relevant issue concerning the activities of prevention for the health of healthcare workers in relation to biological risk. The aim of this paper is to provide an up-date of the issue, based on the suggestions of recent literature about the rules ratified by the new legislative decree and data supplied by the Group of 10 Hospitals participated in this multicenter study. From the analysis of data on healthcare settings (HCS) participating in the project the following considerations can be formulated: i) All HCS considered VdR from biological agents. The method recommended in the Guidelines SIMLIl 2005 is the most followed ii) To grading the risk, the use of invasive procedures for carrying out the analysis results is a necessary element Hi) the operators classified as exposed to biological risk, and therefore subject to health surveillance, represent almost all of workforce in 7 out of 10 HCS. The subgroup believes that VdR must be conducted in close collaboration with the occupational physician and should represent a worthwhile investment with spin-off character on prevention, decision making, empowering. The presence of environmental requirements and organizational procedures should be considered, so that HCS is enabled for an effective risk management, without which risk assessments cannot be performed. The method of VdR mentioned in the guidelines MLIS 2005, besides being the most widely used by the company participating in the study, still has practical reasons and opportunities to justify its use. The HCS group felt the need to propose an implementation of the definition of invasive procedures and EPP, together with individual assessment. Flexibility was suggested in identifying different levels of risk with the involvement of occupational physicians, especially in the presence of EPP, also in order to plan content and frequency of health surveillance.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)240-244
Number of pages5
JournalGiornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia
Volume32
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Health
Guidelines
Physicians
Risk Management
Biological Factors
Multicenter Studies
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Focus sulla valutazione del rischio negli ambienti sanitari : Risultati e prospettive di un gruppo di lavoro multicentrico. / Polato, R.; Bacis, M.; Belotti, L.; Biggi, N.; Campagna, M.; Carrer, P.; Cologni, L.; Gattini, V.; Lodi, V.; Magnavita, N.; Micheloni, G.; Negro, C.; Placidi, D.; Puro, V.; Tonelli, F.; Porru, S.

In: Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, Vol. 32, No. 3, 07.2010, p. 240-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Polato, R, Bacis, M, Belotti, L, Biggi, N, Campagna, M, Carrer, P, Cologni, L, Gattini, V, Lodi, V, Magnavita, N, Micheloni, G, Negro, C, Placidi, D, Puro, V, Tonelli, F & Porru, S 2010, 'Focus sulla valutazione del rischio negli ambienti sanitari: Risultati e prospettive di un gruppo di lavoro multicentrico', Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 240-244.
Polato, R. ; Bacis, M. ; Belotti, L. ; Biggi, N. ; Campagna, M. ; Carrer, P. ; Cologni, L. ; Gattini, V. ; Lodi, V. ; Magnavita, N. ; Micheloni, G. ; Negro, C. ; Placidi, D. ; Puro, V. ; Tonelli, F. ; Porru, S. / Focus sulla valutazione del rischio negli ambienti sanitari : Risultati e prospettive di un gruppo di lavoro multicentrico. In: Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia. 2010 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 240-244.
@article{6119a78cddef4fd7a0c8de1b8e1c3414,
title = "Focus sulla valutazione del rischio negli ambienti sanitari: Risultati e prospettive di un gruppo di lavoro multicentrico",
abstract = "The hospital risk assessment (VdR) is certainly a relevant issue concerning the activities of prevention for the health of healthcare workers in relation to biological risk. The aim of this paper is to provide an up-date of the issue, based on the suggestions of recent literature about the rules ratified by the new legislative decree and data supplied by the Group of 10 Hospitals participated in this multicenter study. From the analysis of data on healthcare settings (HCS) participating in the project the following considerations can be formulated: i) All HCS considered VdR from biological agents. The method recommended in the Guidelines SIMLIl 2005 is the most followed ii) To grading the risk, the use of invasive procedures for carrying out the analysis results is a necessary element Hi) the operators classified as exposed to biological risk, and therefore subject to health surveillance, represent almost all of workforce in 7 out of 10 HCS. The subgroup believes that VdR must be conducted in close collaboration with the occupational physician and should represent a worthwhile investment with spin-off character on prevention, decision making, empowering. The presence of environmental requirements and organizational procedures should be considered, so that HCS is enabled for an effective risk management, without which risk assessments cannot be performed. The method of VdR mentioned in the guidelines MLIS 2005, besides being the most widely used by the company participating in the study, still has practical reasons and opportunities to justify its use. The HCS group felt the need to propose an implementation of the definition of invasive procedures and EPP, together with individual assessment. Flexibility was suggested in identifying different levels of risk with the involvement of occupational physicians, especially in the presence of EPP, also in order to plan content and frequency of health surveillance.",
keywords = "Good occupational health practice, Health care settings, Risk assessment",
author = "R. Polato and M. Bacis and L. Belotti and N. Biggi and M. Campagna and P. Carrer and L. Cologni and V. Gattini and V. Lodi and N. Magnavita and G. Micheloni and C. Negro and D. Placidi and V. Puro and F. Tonelli and S. Porru",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
language = "Italian",
volume = "32",
pages = "240--244",
journal = "Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia",
issn = "1592-7830",
publisher = "Tipografia PI-ME Editrice Srl",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Focus sulla valutazione del rischio negli ambienti sanitari

T2 - Risultati e prospettive di un gruppo di lavoro multicentrico

AU - Polato, R.

AU - Bacis, M.

AU - Belotti, L.

AU - Biggi, N.

AU - Campagna, M.

AU - Carrer, P.

AU - Cologni, L.

AU - Gattini, V.

AU - Lodi, V.

AU - Magnavita, N.

AU - Micheloni, G.

AU - Negro, C.

AU - Placidi, D.

AU - Puro, V.

AU - Tonelli, F.

AU - Porru, S.

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - The hospital risk assessment (VdR) is certainly a relevant issue concerning the activities of prevention for the health of healthcare workers in relation to biological risk. The aim of this paper is to provide an up-date of the issue, based on the suggestions of recent literature about the rules ratified by the new legislative decree and data supplied by the Group of 10 Hospitals participated in this multicenter study. From the analysis of data on healthcare settings (HCS) participating in the project the following considerations can be formulated: i) All HCS considered VdR from biological agents. The method recommended in the Guidelines SIMLIl 2005 is the most followed ii) To grading the risk, the use of invasive procedures for carrying out the analysis results is a necessary element Hi) the operators classified as exposed to biological risk, and therefore subject to health surveillance, represent almost all of workforce in 7 out of 10 HCS. The subgroup believes that VdR must be conducted in close collaboration with the occupational physician and should represent a worthwhile investment with spin-off character on prevention, decision making, empowering. The presence of environmental requirements and organizational procedures should be considered, so that HCS is enabled for an effective risk management, without which risk assessments cannot be performed. The method of VdR mentioned in the guidelines MLIS 2005, besides being the most widely used by the company participating in the study, still has practical reasons and opportunities to justify its use. The HCS group felt the need to propose an implementation of the definition of invasive procedures and EPP, together with individual assessment. Flexibility was suggested in identifying different levels of risk with the involvement of occupational physicians, especially in the presence of EPP, also in order to plan content and frequency of health surveillance.

AB - The hospital risk assessment (VdR) is certainly a relevant issue concerning the activities of prevention for the health of healthcare workers in relation to biological risk. The aim of this paper is to provide an up-date of the issue, based on the suggestions of recent literature about the rules ratified by the new legislative decree and data supplied by the Group of 10 Hospitals participated in this multicenter study. From the analysis of data on healthcare settings (HCS) participating in the project the following considerations can be formulated: i) All HCS considered VdR from biological agents. The method recommended in the Guidelines SIMLIl 2005 is the most followed ii) To grading the risk, the use of invasive procedures for carrying out the analysis results is a necessary element Hi) the operators classified as exposed to biological risk, and therefore subject to health surveillance, represent almost all of workforce in 7 out of 10 HCS. The subgroup believes that VdR must be conducted in close collaboration with the occupational physician and should represent a worthwhile investment with spin-off character on prevention, decision making, empowering. The presence of environmental requirements and organizational procedures should be considered, so that HCS is enabled for an effective risk management, without which risk assessments cannot be performed. The method of VdR mentioned in the guidelines MLIS 2005, besides being the most widely used by the company participating in the study, still has practical reasons and opportunities to justify its use. The HCS group felt the need to propose an implementation of the definition of invasive procedures and EPP, together with individual assessment. Flexibility was suggested in identifying different levels of risk with the involvement of occupational physicians, especially in the presence of EPP, also in order to plan content and frequency of health surveillance.

KW - Good occupational health practice

KW - Health care settings

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958060702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958060702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

VL - 32

SP - 240

EP - 244

JO - Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia

JF - Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia

SN - 1592-7830

IS - 3

ER -