Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block

Andrea Casati, Guido Fanelli, Giorgio Aldegheri, Eleonora Colnaghi, Elisabetta Casaletti, Valeria Cedrati, Giorgio Torri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate if use of an asymmetric spinal block affects the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia. Methods. With Ethical Committee approval and patient consent, 120 patients undergoing lower limb surgery were placed in the lateral position with the side to be operated on dependent, and received 8 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine through a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: (a) local anesthetic was injected with barbotage through a cranially directed needle orifice, then patients were immediately turned to supine (conventional, n = 60); (b) local anesthetic was injected without barbotage with the needle orifice turned toward the dependent side, then the lateral position was maintained for 15 minutes (unilateral, n = 60). A blind observer recorded noninvasive hemodynamic variables, as well as loss of cold and pinprick sensation and motor block on both sides. Results. In the unilateral group, 31 patients (52%) showed a unilateral loss of cold sensation and 48 patients (80%) had no motor block on the nondependent side for the duration of the study, whereas all conventional patients had bilateral distribution of spinal block (P <.0001). The onset time and two-segment regression of sensory block on the dependent side were more rapid in the conventional group (18 ± 7 minutes and 60 ± 18 minutes) than in the unilateral group (22 ± 8 minutes and 67 ± 19 minutes) (P <.05 and P <.05, respectively). The incidence of hypotension (SAP decrease >30% from baseline) was higher in the conventional (22.4%) than unilateral group (5%) (P <.01). The maximum percentage changes from baseline values of systolic arterial blood pressure and heart rate were greater in conventional group (-28% ± 16% and -19% ± 10%) than in unilateral group (-8% ± 16% and -12% ± 18%) (P <.0001 and P <.01, respectively). Conclusions. Achieving an asymmetric distribution of spinal block by injecting a small dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine through a Whitacre spinal needle into patients placed in the lateral position for 15 min reduces the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)214-219
Number of pages6
JournalRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Volume24
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - May 1999

Fingerprint

Hypotension
Needles
Spinal Anesthesia
Bupivacaine
Local Anesthetics
Incidence
Double-Blind Method
Lower Extremity
Arterial Pressure
Heart Rate
Hemodynamics

Keywords

  • Bupivacaine
  • Cardiovascular effects
  • Hypotension
  • Monitoring
  • Regional anesthesia
  • Spinal anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Casati, A., Fanelli, G., Aldegheri, G., Colnaghi, E., Casaletti, E., Cedrati, V., & Torri, G. (1999). Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 24(3), 214-219.

Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block. / Casati, Andrea; Fanelli, Guido; Aldegheri, Giorgio; Colnaghi, Eleonora; Casaletti, Elisabetta; Cedrati, Valeria; Torri, Giorgio.

In: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 3, 05.1999, p. 214-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Casati, A, Fanelli, G, Aldegheri, G, Colnaghi, E, Casaletti, E, Cedrati, V & Torri, G 1999, 'Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block', Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 214-219.
Casati A, Fanelli G, Aldegheri G, Colnaghi E, Casaletti E, Cedrati V et al. Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 1999 May;24(3):214-219.
Casati, Andrea ; Fanelli, Guido ; Aldegheri, Giorgio ; Colnaghi, Eleonora ; Casaletti, Elisabetta ; Cedrati, Valeria ; Torri, Giorgio. / Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block. In: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 214-219.
@article{7c6b98c441a245f8a53ff359bc9c03de,
title = "Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block",
abstract = "Background and Objectives. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate if use of an asymmetric spinal block affects the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia. Methods. With Ethical Committee approval and patient consent, 120 patients undergoing lower limb surgery were placed in the lateral position with the side to be operated on dependent, and received 8 mg 0.5{\%} hyperbaric bupivacaine through a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: (a) local anesthetic was injected with barbotage through a cranially directed needle orifice, then patients were immediately turned to supine (conventional, n = 60); (b) local anesthetic was injected without barbotage with the needle orifice turned toward the dependent side, then the lateral position was maintained for 15 minutes (unilateral, n = 60). A blind observer recorded noninvasive hemodynamic variables, as well as loss of cold and pinprick sensation and motor block on both sides. Results. In the unilateral group, 31 patients (52{\%}) showed a unilateral loss of cold sensation and 48 patients (80{\%}) had no motor block on the nondependent side for the duration of the study, whereas all conventional patients had bilateral distribution of spinal block (P <.0001). The onset time and two-segment regression of sensory block on the dependent side were more rapid in the conventional group (18 ± 7 minutes and 60 ± 18 minutes) than in the unilateral group (22 ± 8 minutes and 67 ± 19 minutes) (P <.05 and P <.05, respectively). The incidence of hypotension (SAP decrease >30{\%} from baseline) was higher in the conventional (22.4{\%}) than unilateral group (5{\%}) (P <.01). The maximum percentage changes from baseline values of systolic arterial blood pressure and heart rate were greater in conventional group (-28{\%} ± 16{\%} and -19{\%} ± 10{\%}) than in unilateral group (-8{\%} ± 16{\%} and -12{\%} ± 18{\%}) (P <.0001 and P <.01, respectively). Conclusions. Achieving an asymmetric distribution of spinal block by injecting a small dose of 0.5{\%} hyperbaric bupivacaine through a Whitacre spinal needle into patients placed in the lateral position for 15 min reduces the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia.",
keywords = "Bupivacaine, Cardiovascular effects, Hypotension, Monitoring, Regional anesthesia, Spinal anesthesia",
author = "Andrea Casati and Guido Fanelli and Giorgio Aldegheri and Eleonora Colnaghi and Elisabetta Casaletti and Valeria Cedrati and Giorgio Torri",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "214--219",
journal = "Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine",
issn = "1098-7339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block

AU - Casati, Andrea

AU - Fanelli, Guido

AU - Aldegheri, Giorgio

AU - Colnaghi, Eleonora

AU - Casaletti, Elisabetta

AU - Cedrati, Valeria

AU - Torri, Giorgio

PY - 1999/5

Y1 - 1999/5

N2 - Background and Objectives. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate if use of an asymmetric spinal block affects the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia. Methods. With Ethical Committee approval and patient consent, 120 patients undergoing lower limb surgery were placed in the lateral position with the side to be operated on dependent, and received 8 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine through a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: (a) local anesthetic was injected with barbotage through a cranially directed needle orifice, then patients were immediately turned to supine (conventional, n = 60); (b) local anesthetic was injected without barbotage with the needle orifice turned toward the dependent side, then the lateral position was maintained for 15 minutes (unilateral, n = 60). A blind observer recorded noninvasive hemodynamic variables, as well as loss of cold and pinprick sensation and motor block on both sides. Results. In the unilateral group, 31 patients (52%) showed a unilateral loss of cold sensation and 48 patients (80%) had no motor block on the nondependent side for the duration of the study, whereas all conventional patients had bilateral distribution of spinal block (P <.0001). The onset time and two-segment regression of sensory block on the dependent side were more rapid in the conventional group (18 ± 7 minutes and 60 ± 18 minutes) than in the unilateral group (22 ± 8 minutes and 67 ± 19 minutes) (P <.05 and P <.05, respectively). The incidence of hypotension (SAP decrease >30% from baseline) was higher in the conventional (22.4%) than unilateral group (5%) (P <.01). The maximum percentage changes from baseline values of systolic arterial blood pressure and heart rate were greater in conventional group (-28% ± 16% and -19% ± 10%) than in unilateral group (-8% ± 16% and -12% ± 18%) (P <.0001 and P <.01, respectively). Conclusions. Achieving an asymmetric distribution of spinal block by injecting a small dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine through a Whitacre spinal needle into patients placed in the lateral position for 15 min reduces the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia.

AB - Background and Objectives. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate if use of an asymmetric spinal block affects the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia. Methods. With Ethical Committee approval and patient consent, 120 patients undergoing lower limb surgery were placed in the lateral position with the side to be operated on dependent, and received 8 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine through a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: (a) local anesthetic was injected with barbotage through a cranially directed needle orifice, then patients were immediately turned to supine (conventional, n = 60); (b) local anesthetic was injected without barbotage with the needle orifice turned toward the dependent side, then the lateral position was maintained for 15 minutes (unilateral, n = 60). A blind observer recorded noninvasive hemodynamic variables, as well as loss of cold and pinprick sensation and motor block on both sides. Results. In the unilateral group, 31 patients (52%) showed a unilateral loss of cold sensation and 48 patients (80%) had no motor block on the nondependent side for the duration of the study, whereas all conventional patients had bilateral distribution of spinal block (P <.0001). The onset time and two-segment regression of sensory block on the dependent side were more rapid in the conventional group (18 ± 7 minutes and 60 ± 18 minutes) than in the unilateral group (22 ± 8 minutes and 67 ± 19 minutes) (P <.05 and P <.05, respectively). The incidence of hypotension (SAP decrease >30% from baseline) was higher in the conventional (22.4%) than unilateral group (5%) (P <.01). The maximum percentage changes from baseline values of systolic arterial blood pressure and heart rate were greater in conventional group (-28% ± 16% and -19% ± 10%) than in unilateral group (-8% ± 16% and -12% ± 18%) (P <.0001 and P <.01, respectively). Conclusions. Achieving an asymmetric distribution of spinal block by injecting a small dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine through a Whitacre spinal needle into patients placed in the lateral position for 15 min reduces the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia.

KW - Bupivacaine

KW - Cardiovascular effects

KW - Hypotension

KW - Monitoring

KW - Regional anesthesia

KW - Spinal anesthesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032914170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032914170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10338170

AN - SCOPUS:0032914170

VL - 24

SP - 214

EP - 219

JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

SN - 1098-7339

IS - 3

ER -