Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry: Self regulation and individual differences in humans

Elinor Hardman, John Gruzelier, Kate Cheesman, Ceri Jones, David Liddiard, Hans Schleichert, Niels Birbaumer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Sixteen subjects naive to biofeedback learned lateralised interhemispheric control of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) across electrode sites F3-F4 during three sessions of visual electroencephalograph (EEG) biofeedback. Subjects were required to generate slow negativity shifts either towards the left or the right hemisphere in sixty pseudorandomly ordered trials per session. Group 1 (n = 8) were told to use emotional strategies in the task (positive emotions for left hemisphere activation, negative emotion for right hemisphere activation), group 2 received no guidance. Both groups received feedback in the form of an on-screen rocket-ship, initially centrally placed, which rose to indicate an increase in left hemisphere negativity (relative to the right hemisphere) and fell to indicate an increase in right hemisphere negativity (relative to the left hemisphere). A 2 x 3 x 3 x 2 ANOVA (group x session x block x trial) showed no performance differences between the strategy and no strategy groups. Both groups learned to produce correct direction shifts in the final third of each session during both trial types (P <0.001). The no strategy group showed a particularly strong within session learning effect (P <0.0037) with poor performance in the early part of the sessions, and strong shifts at the end. Subjects high on withdrawal showed stronger rightward shifts in keeping with right hemisphere involvement in behavioural withdrawal. This is the first demonstration of self regulation of interhemispheric frontal asymmetry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-120
Number of pages4
JournalNeuroscience Letters
Volume221
Issue number2-3
Publication statusPublished - Jan 17 1997

Fingerprint

Individuality
Emotions
Ships
Analysis of Variance
Electrodes
Learning
Self-Control
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Direction compound

Keywords

  • individual differences
  • interhemispheric frontal asymmetry
  • self regulation
  • slow cortical potentials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Hardman, E., Gruzelier, J., Cheesman, K., Jones, C., Liddiard, D., Schleichert, H., & Birbaumer, N. (1997). Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry: Self regulation and individual differences in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 221(2-3), 117-120.

Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry : Self regulation and individual differences in humans. / Hardman, Elinor; Gruzelier, John; Cheesman, Kate; Jones, Ceri; Liddiard, David; Schleichert, Hans; Birbaumer, Niels.

In: Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 221, No. 2-3, 17.01.1997, p. 117-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hardman, E, Gruzelier, J, Cheesman, K, Jones, C, Liddiard, D, Schleichert, H & Birbaumer, N 1997, 'Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry: Self regulation and individual differences in humans', Neuroscience Letters, vol. 221, no. 2-3, pp. 117-120.
Hardman E, Gruzelier J, Cheesman K, Jones C, Liddiard D, Schleichert H et al. Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry: Self regulation and individual differences in humans. Neuroscience Letters. 1997 Jan 17;221(2-3):117-120.
Hardman, Elinor ; Gruzelier, John ; Cheesman, Kate ; Jones, Ceri ; Liddiard, David ; Schleichert, Hans ; Birbaumer, Niels. / Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry : Self regulation and individual differences in humans. In: Neuroscience Letters. 1997 ; Vol. 221, No. 2-3. pp. 117-120.
@article{6bfe3165ae2b4fdeb58ae1e391c469f8,
title = "Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry: Self regulation and individual differences in humans",
abstract = "Sixteen subjects naive to biofeedback learned lateralised interhemispheric control of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) across electrode sites F3-F4 during three sessions of visual electroencephalograph (EEG) biofeedback. Subjects were required to generate slow negativity shifts either towards the left or the right hemisphere in sixty pseudorandomly ordered trials per session. Group 1 (n = 8) were told to use emotional strategies in the task (positive emotions for left hemisphere activation, negative emotion for right hemisphere activation), group 2 received no guidance. Both groups received feedback in the form of an on-screen rocket-ship, initially centrally placed, which rose to indicate an increase in left hemisphere negativity (relative to the right hemisphere) and fell to indicate an increase in right hemisphere negativity (relative to the left hemisphere). A 2 x 3 x 3 x 2 ANOVA (group x session x block x trial) showed no performance differences between the strategy and no strategy groups. Both groups learned to produce correct direction shifts in the final third of each session during both trial types (P <0.001). The no strategy group showed a particularly strong within session learning effect (P <0.0037) with poor performance in the early part of the sessions, and strong shifts at the end. Subjects high on withdrawal showed stronger rightward shifts in keeping with right hemisphere involvement in behavioural withdrawal. This is the first demonstration of self regulation of interhemispheric frontal asymmetry.",
keywords = "individual differences, interhemispheric frontal asymmetry, self regulation, slow cortical potentials",
author = "Elinor Hardman and John Gruzelier and Kate Cheesman and Ceri Jones and David Liddiard and Hans Schleichert and Niels Birbaumer",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "17",
language = "English",
volume = "221",
pages = "117--120",
journal = "Neuroscience Letters",
issn = "0304-3940",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry

T2 - Self regulation and individual differences in humans

AU - Hardman, Elinor

AU - Gruzelier, John

AU - Cheesman, Kate

AU - Jones, Ceri

AU - Liddiard, David

AU - Schleichert, Hans

AU - Birbaumer, Niels

PY - 1997/1/17

Y1 - 1997/1/17

N2 - Sixteen subjects naive to biofeedback learned lateralised interhemispheric control of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) across electrode sites F3-F4 during three sessions of visual electroencephalograph (EEG) biofeedback. Subjects were required to generate slow negativity shifts either towards the left or the right hemisphere in sixty pseudorandomly ordered trials per session. Group 1 (n = 8) were told to use emotional strategies in the task (positive emotions for left hemisphere activation, negative emotion for right hemisphere activation), group 2 received no guidance. Both groups received feedback in the form of an on-screen rocket-ship, initially centrally placed, which rose to indicate an increase in left hemisphere negativity (relative to the right hemisphere) and fell to indicate an increase in right hemisphere negativity (relative to the left hemisphere). A 2 x 3 x 3 x 2 ANOVA (group x session x block x trial) showed no performance differences between the strategy and no strategy groups. Both groups learned to produce correct direction shifts in the final third of each session during both trial types (P <0.001). The no strategy group showed a particularly strong within session learning effect (P <0.0037) with poor performance in the early part of the sessions, and strong shifts at the end. Subjects high on withdrawal showed stronger rightward shifts in keeping with right hemisphere involvement in behavioural withdrawal. This is the first demonstration of self regulation of interhemispheric frontal asymmetry.

AB - Sixteen subjects naive to biofeedback learned lateralised interhemispheric control of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) across electrode sites F3-F4 during three sessions of visual electroencephalograph (EEG) biofeedback. Subjects were required to generate slow negativity shifts either towards the left or the right hemisphere in sixty pseudorandomly ordered trials per session. Group 1 (n = 8) were told to use emotional strategies in the task (positive emotions for left hemisphere activation, negative emotion for right hemisphere activation), group 2 received no guidance. Both groups received feedback in the form of an on-screen rocket-ship, initially centrally placed, which rose to indicate an increase in left hemisphere negativity (relative to the right hemisphere) and fell to indicate an increase in right hemisphere negativity (relative to the left hemisphere). A 2 x 3 x 3 x 2 ANOVA (group x session x block x trial) showed no performance differences between the strategy and no strategy groups. Both groups learned to produce correct direction shifts in the final third of each session during both trial types (P <0.001). The no strategy group showed a particularly strong within session learning effect (P <0.0037) with poor performance in the early part of the sessions, and strong shifts at the end. Subjects high on withdrawal showed stronger rightward shifts in keeping with right hemisphere involvement in behavioural withdrawal. This is the first demonstration of self regulation of interhemispheric frontal asymmetry.

KW - individual differences

KW - interhemispheric frontal asymmetry

KW - self regulation

KW - slow cortical potentials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0343554740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0343554740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9121678

AN - SCOPUS:0343554740

VL - 221

SP - 117

EP - 120

JO - Neuroscience Letters

JF - Neuroscience Letters

SN - 0304-3940

IS - 2-3

ER -