Frovatriptan versus other triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: Pooled analysis of three double-blind, randomized, cross-over, multicenter, Italian studies

Pietro Cortelli, Gianni Allais, Vincenzo Tullo, Chiara Benedetto, Dario Zava, Stefano Omboni, Gennaro Bussone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The objective of the study is to systematically review the efficacy and safety of frovatriptan (F) versus rizatriptan (R), zolmitriptan (Z) and almotriptan (A), through a pooled analysis of three individual studies. 414 subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) were randomized to F 2.5 mg or R 10 mg (study 1), F 2.5 mg or Z 2.5 mg (study 2), and F 2.5 mg or A 12.5 mg (study 3). The studies had an identical multicenter, randomized, double blind, cross-over design, with each of the two treatment periods lasting not more than 3 months. The number of pain free (PF) and pain relief (PR) episodes at 2 h, and the number of sustained pain free (SPF) and recurrent episodes within the 48 h were the efficacy endpoints. 346 patients were included in the intention-totreat analysis. Rate of PF episodes at 2 h was 30% with F and 34% with comparators (p = NS). PR episodes at 2 h were 55% for F and 59% for comparators (p = NS). SPF episodes at 48 h were also similar between the two groups (22% F vs. 21% comparators). Rate of recurrence was significantly (p

Original languageEnglish
JournalNeurological Sciences
Volume32
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Keywords

  • Almotriptan
  • Frovatriptan
  • Migraine
  • Rizatriptan
  • Zolmitriptan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Dermatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Frovatriptan versus other triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: Pooled analysis of three double-blind, randomized, cross-over, multicenter, Italian studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this