Functional results of robotic total intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis

F. Luca, M. Valvo, M. Guerra-Cogorno, D. Simo, E. Blesa-Sierra, R. Biffi, C. Garberoglio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In recent decades there has been an increasing trend toward sphincter-preserving procedures for the treatment of low rectal cancer. Robotic surgery is considered to be particularly beneficial when operating in the deep pelvis, where laparoscopy presents technical limitations. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the functional outcomes in patients affected by rectal cancer after robotic total intersphincteric resection (ISR) with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. Methods and procedures: From March 2008 to October 2012, 23 consecutive patients affected by distal rectal adenocarcinoma underwent robotic ISR. Operative, clinical, pathological and functional data regarding continence or presence of a low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) were prospectively collected in a database. Results: Twenty-three consecutive patients were included in the study: 8 men and 15 women. The mean age was 60.2 years (range 28-73). Eighteen (78.3%) had neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Conversion rate was nil. The mean operative time was 296.01 min and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.43 ± 1.73 days. According to Kirwan's incontinence score, good fecal continence was shown in 85.7% of patients (Grade 1 and 2) and none required a colostomy (Grade 4). Concerning LARS score, the results were as follows: 57.1% patients had no LARS; 19% minor LARS and 23.8% major LARS. Conclusions: Robotic total ISR for low rectal cancer is an acceptable alternative to traditional procedures. Extensive discussion with the patient about the risk of poor functional outcomes or LARS syndrome is mandatory when considering an ISR for treatment of low rectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Robotics
Hand
Rectal Neoplasms
Colostomy
Chemoradiotherapy
Operative Time
Pelvis
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Adenocarcinoma
Databases
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Colorectal surgery
  • Da Vinci system
  • Rectal cancer
  • Robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Functional results of robotic total intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. / Luca, F.; Valvo, M.; Guerra-Cogorno, M.; Simo, D.; Blesa-Sierra, E.; Biffi, R.; Garberoglio, C.

In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df4d260bfffd4e6593efe7f6ed49447f,
title = "Functional results of robotic total intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis",
abstract = "Background: In recent decades there has been an increasing trend toward sphincter-preserving procedures for the treatment of low rectal cancer. Robotic surgery is considered to be particularly beneficial when operating in the deep pelvis, where laparoscopy presents technical limitations. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the functional outcomes in patients affected by rectal cancer after robotic total intersphincteric resection (ISR) with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. Methods and procedures: From March 2008 to October 2012, 23 consecutive patients affected by distal rectal adenocarcinoma underwent robotic ISR. Operative, clinical, pathological and functional data regarding continence or presence of a low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) were prospectively collected in a database. Results: Twenty-three consecutive patients were included in the study: 8 men and 15 women. The mean age was 60.2 years (range 28-73). Eighteen (78.3{\%}) had neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Conversion rate was nil. The mean operative time was 296.01 min and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.43 ± 1.73 days. According to Kirwan's incontinence score, good fecal continence was shown in 85.7{\%} of patients (Grade 1 and 2) and none required a colostomy (Grade 4). Concerning LARS score, the results were as follows: 57.1{\%} patients had no LARS; 19{\%} minor LARS and 23.8{\%} major LARS. Conclusions: Robotic total ISR for low rectal cancer is an acceptable alternative to traditional procedures. Extensive discussion with the patient about the risk of poor functional outcomes or LARS syndrome is mandatory when considering an ISR for treatment of low rectal cancer.",
keywords = "Colorectal surgery, Da Vinci system, Rectal cancer, Robotic surgery",
author = "F. Luca and M. Valvo and M. Guerra-Cogorno and D. Simo and E. Blesa-Sierra and R. Biffi and C. Garberoglio",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.007",
language = "English",
journal = "European Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0748-7983",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional results of robotic total intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis

AU - Luca, F.

AU - Valvo, M.

AU - Guerra-Cogorno, M.

AU - Simo, D.

AU - Blesa-Sierra, E.

AU - Biffi, R.

AU - Garberoglio, C.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: In recent decades there has been an increasing trend toward sphincter-preserving procedures for the treatment of low rectal cancer. Robotic surgery is considered to be particularly beneficial when operating in the deep pelvis, where laparoscopy presents technical limitations. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the functional outcomes in patients affected by rectal cancer after robotic total intersphincteric resection (ISR) with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. Methods and procedures: From March 2008 to October 2012, 23 consecutive patients affected by distal rectal adenocarcinoma underwent robotic ISR. Operative, clinical, pathological and functional data regarding continence or presence of a low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) were prospectively collected in a database. Results: Twenty-three consecutive patients were included in the study: 8 men and 15 women. The mean age was 60.2 years (range 28-73). Eighteen (78.3%) had neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Conversion rate was nil. The mean operative time was 296.01 min and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.43 ± 1.73 days. According to Kirwan's incontinence score, good fecal continence was shown in 85.7% of patients (Grade 1 and 2) and none required a colostomy (Grade 4). Concerning LARS score, the results were as follows: 57.1% patients had no LARS; 19% minor LARS and 23.8% major LARS. Conclusions: Robotic total ISR for low rectal cancer is an acceptable alternative to traditional procedures. Extensive discussion with the patient about the risk of poor functional outcomes or LARS syndrome is mandatory when considering an ISR for treatment of low rectal cancer.

AB - Background: In recent decades there has been an increasing trend toward sphincter-preserving procedures for the treatment of low rectal cancer. Robotic surgery is considered to be particularly beneficial when operating in the deep pelvis, where laparoscopy presents technical limitations. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the functional outcomes in patients affected by rectal cancer after robotic total intersphincteric resection (ISR) with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. Methods and procedures: From March 2008 to October 2012, 23 consecutive patients affected by distal rectal adenocarcinoma underwent robotic ISR. Operative, clinical, pathological and functional data regarding continence or presence of a low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) were prospectively collected in a database. Results: Twenty-three consecutive patients were included in the study: 8 men and 15 women. The mean age was 60.2 years (range 28-73). Eighteen (78.3%) had neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Conversion rate was nil. The mean operative time was 296.01 min and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.43 ± 1.73 days. According to Kirwan's incontinence score, good fecal continence was shown in 85.7% of patients (Grade 1 and 2) and none required a colostomy (Grade 4). Concerning LARS score, the results were as follows: 57.1% patients had no LARS; 19% minor LARS and 23.8% major LARS. Conclusions: Robotic total ISR for low rectal cancer is an acceptable alternative to traditional procedures. Extensive discussion with the patient about the risk of poor functional outcomes or LARS syndrome is mandatory when considering an ISR for treatment of low rectal cancer.

KW - Colorectal surgery

KW - Da Vinci system

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961885120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961885120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961885120

JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0748-7983

ER -