TY - JOUR
T1 - Gestational diabetes
T2 - Universal or selective screening?
AU - Alberico, Salvatore
AU - Strazzanti, Concetta
AU - De Santo, Davide
AU - De Seta, Francesco
AU - Lenardon, Patrizia
AU - Bernardon, M.
AU - Zicari, Sandro
AU - Guaschino, Secondo
PY - 2004/12
Y1 - 2004/12
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the incidence of gestational diabetes in our population and verify costs of universal screening. To assess neonatal and obstetrical outcomes with respect to maternal epidemiological characteristics. Methods: Eight hundred and fifty-six pregnant women between 24th and 28th weeks of gestation were examined in this observational study. Universal screening with glucose challenge test was used to screen the group for gestational diabetes. History, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were collected and then analyzed. Results: Gestational diabetes was diagnosed in 6.6% of cases. Patients with at least one risk factor had a cesarean section in 50% of cases and a spontaneous vaginal delivery in 23.59% of cases (p <0.001). The absence of any risk factor was found in 73.7% of positive glucose tolerance test and in 62.5% of affected patients. The cost of universal screening in our study, was 57,60 € per case identified. Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of diabetes, the high proportion of patients potentially not identified with a selective screening in this study and the relatively low cost, universal screening for gestational diabetes seems the best way to identify patients and prevent adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the incidence of gestational diabetes in our population and verify costs of universal screening. To assess neonatal and obstetrical outcomes with respect to maternal epidemiological characteristics. Methods: Eight hundred and fifty-six pregnant women between 24th and 28th weeks of gestation were examined in this observational study. Universal screening with glucose challenge test was used to screen the group for gestational diabetes. History, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were collected and then analyzed. Results: Gestational diabetes was diagnosed in 6.6% of cases. Patients with at least one risk factor had a cesarean section in 50% of cases and a spontaneous vaginal delivery in 23.59% of cases (p <0.001). The absence of any risk factor was found in 73.7% of positive glucose tolerance test and in 62.5% of affected patients. The cost of universal screening in our study, was 57,60 € per case identified. Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of diabetes, the high proportion of patients potentially not identified with a selective screening in this study and the relatively low cost, universal screening for gestational diabetes seems the best way to identify patients and prevent adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
KW - Gestational diabetes
KW - Risk factors
KW - Selective screening
KW - Universal screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12444311682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12444311682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14767050400018114
DO - 10.1080/14767050400018114
M3 - Article
C2 - 15621551
AN - SCOPUS:12444311682
VL - 16
SP - 331
EP - 337
JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
SN - 1476-7058
IS - 6
ER -