Gianotti-Crosti syndrome

a retrospective analysis of 308 cases.

R. Caputo, C. Gelmetti, E. Ermacora, E. Gianni, A. Silvestri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no agreement as to whether papular acrodermatitis of childhood caused by hepatitis B virus can be differentiated from other papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to establish whether such differentiation is possible comparing histories, signs, and symptoms of all patients who have been previously diagnosed as having papular acrodermatitis of childhood or papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes. METHODS: Files of 308 patients hospitalized in the past three decades were studied. Photographs were examined by a panel of experts to determine whether it was possible to distinguish between papular acrodermatitis of childhood and papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes solely on the basis of cutaneous signs. RESULTS: The retrospective analysis confirmed a significant overlapping of the two types of the disease. The blind survey of photographs of the patients revealed that a distinction between the forms was not clinically possible. CONCLUSION: Acrodermatitis is a self-limiting cutaneous response to different viruses; clinical differences are probably due to individual characteristics of each patient rather than the causative virus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-210
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume26
Issue number2 Pt 1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1992

Fingerprint

Acrodermatitis
Viruses
Skin
Hepatitis B virus
Signs and Symptoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Caputo, R., Gelmetti, C., Ermacora, E., Gianni, E., & Silvestri, A. (1992). Gianotti-Crosti syndrome: a retrospective analysis of 308 cases. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 26(2 Pt 1), 207-210.

Gianotti-Crosti syndrome : a retrospective analysis of 308 cases. / Caputo, R.; Gelmetti, C.; Ermacora, E.; Gianni, E.; Silvestri, A.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Vol. 26, No. 2 Pt 1, 02.1992, p. 207-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caputo, R, Gelmetti, C, Ermacora, E, Gianni, E & Silvestri, A 1992, 'Gianotti-Crosti syndrome: a retrospective analysis of 308 cases.', Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 26, no. 2 Pt 1, pp. 207-210.
Caputo, R. ; Gelmetti, C. ; Ermacora, E. ; Gianni, E. ; Silvestri, A. / Gianotti-Crosti syndrome : a retrospective analysis of 308 cases. In: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1992 ; Vol. 26, No. 2 Pt 1. pp. 207-210.
@article{76e34503066647de915f05906772fa17,
title = "Gianotti-Crosti syndrome: a retrospective analysis of 308 cases.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: There is no agreement as to whether papular acrodermatitis of childhood caused by hepatitis B virus can be differentiated from other papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to establish whether such differentiation is possible comparing histories, signs, and symptoms of all patients who have been previously diagnosed as having papular acrodermatitis of childhood or papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes. METHODS: Files of 308 patients hospitalized in the past three decades were studied. Photographs were examined by a panel of experts to determine whether it was possible to distinguish between papular acrodermatitis of childhood and papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes solely on the basis of cutaneous signs. RESULTS: The retrospective analysis confirmed a significant overlapping of the two types of the disease. The blind survey of photographs of the patients revealed that a distinction between the forms was not clinically possible. CONCLUSION: Acrodermatitis is a self-limiting cutaneous response to different viruses; clinical differences are probably due to individual characteristics of each patient rather than the causative virus.",
author = "R. Caputo and C. Gelmetti and E. Ermacora and E. Gianni and A. Silvestri",
year = "1992",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "207--210",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology",
issn = "0190-9622",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2 Pt 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gianotti-Crosti syndrome

T2 - a retrospective analysis of 308 cases.

AU - Caputo, R.

AU - Gelmetti, C.

AU - Ermacora, E.

AU - Gianni, E.

AU - Silvestri, A.

PY - 1992/2

Y1 - 1992/2

N2 - BACKGROUND: There is no agreement as to whether papular acrodermatitis of childhood caused by hepatitis B virus can be differentiated from other papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to establish whether such differentiation is possible comparing histories, signs, and symptoms of all patients who have been previously diagnosed as having papular acrodermatitis of childhood or papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes. METHODS: Files of 308 patients hospitalized in the past three decades were studied. Photographs were examined by a panel of experts to determine whether it was possible to distinguish between papular acrodermatitis of childhood and papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes solely on the basis of cutaneous signs. RESULTS: The retrospective analysis confirmed a significant overlapping of the two types of the disease. The blind survey of photographs of the patients revealed that a distinction between the forms was not clinically possible. CONCLUSION: Acrodermatitis is a self-limiting cutaneous response to different viruses; clinical differences are probably due to individual characteristics of each patient rather than the causative virus.

AB - BACKGROUND: There is no agreement as to whether papular acrodermatitis of childhood caused by hepatitis B virus can be differentiated from other papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to establish whether such differentiation is possible comparing histories, signs, and symptoms of all patients who have been previously diagnosed as having papular acrodermatitis of childhood or papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes. METHODS: Files of 308 patients hospitalized in the past three decades were studied. Photographs were examined by a panel of experts to determine whether it was possible to distinguish between papular acrodermatitis of childhood and papulovesicular acrolocated syndromes solely on the basis of cutaneous signs. RESULTS: The retrospective analysis confirmed a significant overlapping of the two types of the disease. The blind survey of photographs of the patients revealed that a distinction between the forms was not clinically possible. CONCLUSION: Acrodermatitis is a self-limiting cutaneous response to different viruses; clinical differences are probably due to individual characteristics of each patient rather than the causative virus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026812984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026812984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 207

EP - 210

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

SN - 0190-9622

IS - 2 Pt 1

ER -