Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party

M. S. Silay, A. F. Spinoit, S. Undre, V. Fiala, Z. Tandogdu, T. Garmanova, A. Guttilla, A. A. Sancaktutar, B. Haid, M. Waldert, A. Goyal, E. C. Serefoglu, E. Baldassarre, G. Manzoni, A. Radford, R. Subramaniam, A. Cherian, P. Hoebeke, M. Jacobs, B. RoccoR. Yuriy, F. Zattoni, R. Kocvara, C. J. Koh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction in children has gained popularity over the past decade as an alternative to open surgery. The present study aimed to identify the factors affecting complication rates of MIP in children, and to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic (LP) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP). Materials and methods: The perioperative data of 783 pediatric patients (

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Pediatric Urology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 5 2016

Keywords

  • Children
  • Laparoscopy
  • Pyeloplasty
  • Robot

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this