Glucose turnover in presence of changing glucose concentrations: Error analysis for glucose disappearance

A. Caumo, M. Homan, H. Katz, C. Cobelli, R. Rizza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present studies were undertaken to determine whether 1) the cold- and hot-GINF techniques used with Steele's model provide equivalent estimates of the rates of glucose appearance (R(a)) and disappearance (R(d)) in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, 2) the conditions for the best estimation of R(a) are the same as those for R(d), 3) the magnitude of error (if present) differs in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, and 4) situations exist in which the knowledge of R(d) allows inferences to be made on whole body glucose uptake. To do so we performed experiments in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic subjects using simultaneous infusions of [6-3H]glucose and [6- 14C]glucose; glucose and insulin were infused to mimic normal postprandial glucose and insulin profiles; the infused glucose contained [6-14C]glucose but not [6-3H]glucose. Compared with the hot-GINF method, the traditional cold-GINF method underestimated (P <0.05) R(a) and R(d) by 10-15% and hepatic glucose release by 25-50% during the 1st h of the study, with the magnitude of error being the same in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Error analysis demonstrated that errors in R(a) and R(d) have different analytic expressions containing common structural but different volume errors. Both R(a) and R(d) can be accurately measured in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects if glucose specific activity is kept constant and the volume of the accessible pool is used to calculate glucose disappearance. The relationship between R(d) and whole body glucose uptake was also derived. Although R(a) can be determined by relying on measurements in the accessible pool only, the assessment of whole body glucose uptake requires a model of the nonaccessible portion of the glucose system. However, knowledge of R(d) can provide useful insights into the behavior of whole body glucose uptake.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume269
Issue number3 32-3
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Error analysis
Glucose
glucose
insulin
Insulin
Medical problems
noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • hepatic glucose release
  • mathematical modeling
  • nonsteady state
  • tracer kinetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Endocrinology
  • Physiology
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Glucose turnover in presence of changing glucose concentrations : Error analysis for glucose disappearance. / Caumo, A.; Homan, M.; Katz, H.; Cobelli, C.; Rizza, R.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol. 269, No. 3 32-3, 1995.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c698a1638bc432c9ef4c1daef97007e,
title = "Glucose turnover in presence of changing glucose concentrations: Error analysis for glucose disappearance",
abstract = "The present studies were undertaken to determine whether 1) the cold- and hot-GINF techniques used with Steele's model provide equivalent estimates of the rates of glucose appearance (R(a)) and disappearance (R(d)) in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, 2) the conditions for the best estimation of R(a) are the same as those for R(d), 3) the magnitude of error (if present) differs in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, and 4) situations exist in which the knowledge of R(d) allows inferences to be made on whole body glucose uptake. To do so we performed experiments in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic subjects using simultaneous infusions of [6-3H]glucose and [6- 14C]glucose; glucose and insulin were infused to mimic normal postprandial glucose and insulin profiles; the infused glucose contained [6-14C]glucose but not [6-3H]glucose. Compared with the hot-GINF method, the traditional cold-GINF method underestimated (P <0.05) R(a) and R(d) by 10-15{\%} and hepatic glucose release by 25-50{\%} during the 1st h of the study, with the magnitude of error being the same in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Error analysis demonstrated that errors in R(a) and R(d) have different analytic expressions containing common structural but different volume errors. Both R(a) and R(d) can be accurately measured in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects if glucose specific activity is kept constant and the volume of the accessible pool is used to calculate glucose disappearance. The relationship between R(d) and whole body glucose uptake was also derived. Although R(a) can be determined by relying on measurements in the accessible pool only, the assessment of whole body glucose uptake requires a model of the nonaccessible portion of the glucose system. However, knowledge of R(d) can provide useful insights into the behavior of whole body glucose uptake.",
keywords = "hepatic glucose release, mathematical modeling, nonsteady state, tracer kinetics",
author = "A. Caumo and M. Homan and H. Katz and C. Cobelli and R. Rizza",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "269",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology",
issn = "0363-6119",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "3 32-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glucose turnover in presence of changing glucose concentrations

T2 - Error analysis for glucose disappearance

AU - Caumo, A.

AU - Homan, M.

AU - Katz, H.

AU - Cobelli, C.

AU - Rizza, R.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The present studies were undertaken to determine whether 1) the cold- and hot-GINF techniques used with Steele's model provide equivalent estimates of the rates of glucose appearance (R(a)) and disappearance (R(d)) in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, 2) the conditions for the best estimation of R(a) are the same as those for R(d), 3) the magnitude of error (if present) differs in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, and 4) situations exist in which the knowledge of R(d) allows inferences to be made on whole body glucose uptake. To do so we performed experiments in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic subjects using simultaneous infusions of [6-3H]glucose and [6- 14C]glucose; glucose and insulin were infused to mimic normal postprandial glucose and insulin profiles; the infused glucose contained [6-14C]glucose but not [6-3H]glucose. Compared with the hot-GINF method, the traditional cold-GINF method underestimated (P <0.05) R(a) and R(d) by 10-15% and hepatic glucose release by 25-50% during the 1st h of the study, with the magnitude of error being the same in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Error analysis demonstrated that errors in R(a) and R(d) have different analytic expressions containing common structural but different volume errors. Both R(a) and R(d) can be accurately measured in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects if glucose specific activity is kept constant and the volume of the accessible pool is used to calculate glucose disappearance. The relationship between R(d) and whole body glucose uptake was also derived. Although R(a) can be determined by relying on measurements in the accessible pool only, the assessment of whole body glucose uptake requires a model of the nonaccessible portion of the glucose system. However, knowledge of R(d) can provide useful insights into the behavior of whole body glucose uptake.

AB - The present studies were undertaken to determine whether 1) the cold- and hot-GINF techniques used with Steele's model provide equivalent estimates of the rates of glucose appearance (R(a)) and disappearance (R(d)) in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, 2) the conditions for the best estimation of R(a) are the same as those for R(d), 3) the magnitude of error (if present) differs in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, and 4) situations exist in which the knowledge of R(d) allows inferences to be made on whole body glucose uptake. To do so we performed experiments in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic subjects using simultaneous infusions of [6-3H]glucose and [6- 14C]glucose; glucose and insulin were infused to mimic normal postprandial glucose and insulin profiles; the infused glucose contained [6-14C]glucose but not [6-3H]glucose. Compared with the hot-GINF method, the traditional cold-GINF method underestimated (P <0.05) R(a) and R(d) by 10-15% and hepatic glucose release by 25-50% during the 1st h of the study, with the magnitude of error being the same in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Error analysis demonstrated that errors in R(a) and R(d) have different analytic expressions containing common structural but different volume errors. Both R(a) and R(d) can be accurately measured in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects if glucose specific activity is kept constant and the volume of the accessible pool is used to calculate glucose disappearance. The relationship between R(d) and whole body glucose uptake was also derived. Although R(a) can be determined by relying on measurements in the accessible pool only, the assessment of whole body glucose uptake requires a model of the nonaccessible portion of the glucose system. However, knowledge of R(d) can provide useful insights into the behavior of whole body glucose uptake.

KW - hepatic glucose release

KW - mathematical modeling

KW - nonsteady state

KW - tracer kinetics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028816227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028816227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7573434

AN - SCOPUS:0028816227

VL - 269

JO - American Journal of Physiology

JF - American Journal of Physiology

SN - 0363-6119

IS - 3 32-3

ER -