Group rehabilitation versus individual rehabilitation following knee and hip replacement: A pilot study with randomized, single-blind, cross-over design

I. Aprile, R. S. Rizzo, E. Romanini, F. De Santis, S. Marsan, G. Rinaldi, L. Padua

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. In recent years a vast literature has been dedicated to cost effectiveness analysis. In the rehabilitation field, the search for less costly forms of treatment is an area under intense discussion by the rehabilitation scientific community. Group rehabilitation programs for some pathological conditions could permit better allocation of economic resources, but few studies evaluated the efficacy of group physiotherapy as opposed to individual physiotherapy. Aim. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of group rehabilitation (GrpR) with individual rehabilitation (IndR) for inpatients that have undergone knee and hip replacement. Design. This is a pilot study with randomized, single-blind, cross-over design. Setting. Inpatients Physiotherapy Department of Don Gnocchi Foundation. Methods. Clinical disability evaluation (JOASH, IKS, DI) and patient-oriented assessment (SF-36, WOMAC and VAS) were performed on 27 patients undergoing a physical therapy program after knee or hip replacement. Patients having partial weight-bearing postoperatively (about 50% of the total) and a range of motion >50% of the total in the joint replaced were included and then randomized (TO) in two intervention programs: GrpR/IndR - who performed GrpR for 15 days (T1), followed by the IndR for 15 days (T2); and IndR/GrpR - who performed the IndR for 15 days (T1), followed by GrpR for 15 days (T2). Results. Comparing the changes from baseline TIT0 and T2-T1 separately in the two groups most outcomes showed no significant difference. Conclusions. This pilot trial suggests that the group rehabilitation program is just as efficient as the individual rehabilitation for inpatients that have undergone knee and hip replacement and are able to weight-bear postoperatively. A potential benefit of group-based therapy is that it is less resource intensive. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Group rehabilitation program could be use after knee and hip replacement with a reduction of rehabilitation costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)551-559
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume47
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Cross-Over Studies
Hip
Knee
Rehabilitation
Inpatients
Disability Evaluation
Ursidae
Resource Allocation
Weight-Bearing
Group Psychotherapy
Articular Range of Motion
Cost-Benefit Analysis

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • Costs and cost analysis
  • Hip - Arthroplasty
  • Knee - Disability evaluation -
  • Rehabilitation -
  • Replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Group rehabilitation versus individual rehabilitation following knee and hip replacement : A pilot study with randomized, single-blind, cross-over design. / Aprile, I.; Rizzo, R. S.; Romanini, E.; De Santis, F.; Marsan, S.; Rinaldi, G.; Padua, L.

In: European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 47, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 551-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f92a15abaf4243db8dcc52950f63ac13,
title = "Group rehabilitation versus individual rehabilitation following knee and hip replacement: A pilot study with randomized, single-blind, cross-over design",
abstract = "Background. In recent years a vast literature has been dedicated to cost effectiveness analysis. In the rehabilitation field, the search for less costly forms of treatment is an area under intense discussion by the rehabilitation scientific community. Group rehabilitation programs for some pathological conditions could permit better allocation of economic resources, but few studies evaluated the efficacy of group physiotherapy as opposed to individual physiotherapy. Aim. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of group rehabilitation (GrpR) with individual rehabilitation (IndR) for inpatients that have undergone knee and hip replacement. Design. This is a pilot study with randomized, single-blind, cross-over design. Setting. Inpatients Physiotherapy Department of Don Gnocchi Foundation. Methods. Clinical disability evaluation (JOASH, IKS, DI) and patient-oriented assessment (SF-36, WOMAC and VAS) were performed on 27 patients undergoing a physical therapy program after knee or hip replacement. Patients having partial weight-bearing postoperatively (about 50{\%} of the total) and a range of motion >50{\%} of the total in the joint replaced were included and then randomized (TO) in two intervention programs: GrpR/IndR - who performed GrpR for 15 days (T1), followed by the IndR for 15 days (T2); and IndR/GrpR - who performed the IndR for 15 days (T1), followed by GrpR for 15 days (T2). Results. Comparing the changes from baseline TIT0 and T2-T1 separately in the two groups most outcomes showed no significant difference. Conclusions. This pilot trial suggests that the group rehabilitation program is just as efficient as the individual rehabilitation for inpatients that have undergone knee and hip replacement and are able to weight-bear postoperatively. A potential benefit of group-based therapy is that it is less resource intensive. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Group rehabilitation program could be use after knee and hip replacement with a reduction of rehabilitation costs.",
keywords = "Arthroplasty, Costs and cost analysis, Hip - Arthroplasty, Knee - Disability evaluation -, Rehabilitation -, Replacement",
author = "I. Aprile and Rizzo, {R. S.} and E. Romanini and {De Santis}, F. and S. Marsan and G. Rinaldi and L. Padua",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "551--559",
journal = "European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1973-9087",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group rehabilitation versus individual rehabilitation following knee and hip replacement

T2 - A pilot study with randomized, single-blind, cross-over design

AU - Aprile, I.

AU - Rizzo, R. S.

AU - Romanini, E.

AU - De Santis, F.

AU - Marsan, S.

AU - Rinaldi, G.

AU - Padua, L.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Background. In recent years a vast literature has been dedicated to cost effectiveness analysis. In the rehabilitation field, the search for less costly forms of treatment is an area under intense discussion by the rehabilitation scientific community. Group rehabilitation programs for some pathological conditions could permit better allocation of economic resources, but few studies evaluated the efficacy of group physiotherapy as opposed to individual physiotherapy. Aim. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of group rehabilitation (GrpR) with individual rehabilitation (IndR) for inpatients that have undergone knee and hip replacement. Design. This is a pilot study with randomized, single-blind, cross-over design. Setting. Inpatients Physiotherapy Department of Don Gnocchi Foundation. Methods. Clinical disability evaluation (JOASH, IKS, DI) and patient-oriented assessment (SF-36, WOMAC and VAS) were performed on 27 patients undergoing a physical therapy program after knee or hip replacement. Patients having partial weight-bearing postoperatively (about 50% of the total) and a range of motion >50% of the total in the joint replaced were included and then randomized (TO) in two intervention programs: GrpR/IndR - who performed GrpR for 15 days (T1), followed by the IndR for 15 days (T2); and IndR/GrpR - who performed the IndR for 15 days (T1), followed by GrpR for 15 days (T2). Results. Comparing the changes from baseline TIT0 and T2-T1 separately in the two groups most outcomes showed no significant difference. Conclusions. This pilot trial suggests that the group rehabilitation program is just as efficient as the individual rehabilitation for inpatients that have undergone knee and hip replacement and are able to weight-bear postoperatively. A potential benefit of group-based therapy is that it is less resource intensive. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Group rehabilitation program could be use after knee and hip replacement with a reduction of rehabilitation costs.

AB - Background. In recent years a vast literature has been dedicated to cost effectiveness analysis. In the rehabilitation field, the search for less costly forms of treatment is an area under intense discussion by the rehabilitation scientific community. Group rehabilitation programs for some pathological conditions could permit better allocation of economic resources, but few studies evaluated the efficacy of group physiotherapy as opposed to individual physiotherapy. Aim. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of group rehabilitation (GrpR) with individual rehabilitation (IndR) for inpatients that have undergone knee and hip replacement. Design. This is a pilot study with randomized, single-blind, cross-over design. Setting. Inpatients Physiotherapy Department of Don Gnocchi Foundation. Methods. Clinical disability evaluation (JOASH, IKS, DI) and patient-oriented assessment (SF-36, WOMAC and VAS) were performed on 27 patients undergoing a physical therapy program after knee or hip replacement. Patients having partial weight-bearing postoperatively (about 50% of the total) and a range of motion >50% of the total in the joint replaced were included and then randomized (TO) in two intervention programs: GrpR/IndR - who performed GrpR for 15 days (T1), followed by the IndR for 15 days (T2); and IndR/GrpR - who performed the IndR for 15 days (T1), followed by GrpR for 15 days (T2). Results. Comparing the changes from baseline TIT0 and T2-T1 separately in the two groups most outcomes showed no significant difference. Conclusions. This pilot trial suggests that the group rehabilitation program is just as efficient as the individual rehabilitation for inpatients that have undergone knee and hip replacement and are able to weight-bear postoperatively. A potential benefit of group-based therapy is that it is less resource intensive. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Group rehabilitation program could be use after knee and hip replacement with a reduction of rehabilitation costs.

KW - Arthroplasty

KW - Costs and cost analysis

KW - Hip - Arthroplasty

KW - Knee - Disability evaluation -

KW - Rehabilitation -

KW - Replacement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859334952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859334952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21666574

AN - SCOPUS:84859334952

VL - 47

SP - 551

EP - 559

JO - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1973-9087

IS - 4

ER -