Guidelines for quality management of apallic syndrome / vegetative state

Klaus Von Wild, Franz Gerstenbrand, Giuliano Dolce, Heinrich Binder, Pieter E. Vos, Leopold Saltuari, Yuri Alekseenko, Rita Formisano, Annegret Ritz, Erika Ortega-Suhrkamp, Johannes R. Jörg, Alexander A. Potapov, José León-Carrión, Rimantas Vilcinis, George A. Zitnay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Epidemiology in Europe shows constantly increasing figures for the apallic syndrome (AS)/vegetative state (VS) as a consequence of advanced rescue, emergency services, intensive care treatment after acute brain damage and high-standard activating home nursing for completely dependent end-stage cases secondary to progressive neurological disease. Management of patients in irreversible permanent AS/VS has been the subject of sustained scientific and moral-legal debate over the past decade. A task force on guidelines for quality management of AS/VS was set up under the auspices of the Scientific Panel Neurotraumatology of the European Federation of Neurological Societies to address key issues relating to AS/VS prevalence and quality management. Collection and analysis of scientific data on class II (III) evidence from the literature and recommendations based on the best practice as resulting from the task force members' expertise are in accordance with EFNS Guidance regulations. The overall incidence of new AS/VS full stage cases all etiology is 0.5-2/100.000 population per year. About one third are traumatic and two thirds non traumatic cases. Increasing figures for hypoxic brain damage and progressive neurological disease have been noticed. The main conceptual criticism is based on the assessment and diagnosis of all different AS/VS stages based solely on behavioural findings without knowing the exact or uniform pathogenesis or neuropathological findings and the uncertainty of clinical assessment due to varying inclusion criteria. No special diagnostics, no specific medical management can be recommended for class II or III AS treatment and rehabilitation. This is why sine qua non diagnostics of the clinical features and appropriate treatment of AS/VS patients of "AS full, remission, defect and end stages" require further professional training and expertise for doctors and rehabilitation personnel. Management of AS aims at the social reintegration of patients or has to guarantee humanistic active nursing if treatment fails. Outcome depends on the cause and duration of AS/VS as well as patient's age. There is no single AS/VS specific laboratory investigation, no specific regimen or stimulating intervention to be recommended for improving higher cerebral functioning. Quality management requires at least 3 years of advanced training and permanent education to gain approval of qualification for AS/VS treatment and expertise. Sine qua non areas covering AS/VS institutions for early and long-term rehabilitation are required on a population base (prevalence of 2/100.000/year) to quicken functional restoration and to prevent or treat complications. Caring homes are needed for respectful humane nursing including basal sensor-motor stimulating techniques. Passive euthanasia is considered an act of mercy by physicians in terms of withholding treatment; however, ethical and legal issues with regard to withdrawal of nutrition and hydration and end of life discussions raise deep concerns. The aim of the guideline is to provide management guidance (on the best medical evidence class II and III or task force expertise) for neurologists, neurosurgeons, other physicians working with AS/VS patients, neurorehabilitation personnel, patients, next-of-kin, and health authorities. .

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-292
Number of pages25
JournalEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Persistent Vegetative State
Guidelines
Advisory Committees
Rehabilitation
Passive Euthanasia
Nursing
Home Nursing
Physicians
Therapeutics
Brain Hypoxia
Withholding Treatment
Critical Care

Keywords

  • Apallic syndrome
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Functional assessment
  • Management guideline
  • Multidisciplinary neurotraumatology
  • Neurorehabilitation
  • Outcome following severe brain damage
  • Vegetative state
  • Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Von Wild, K., Gerstenbrand, F., Dolce, G., Binder, H., Vos, P. E., Saltuari, L., ... Zitnay, G. A. (2007). Guidelines for quality management of apallic syndrome / vegetative state. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 33(3), 268-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-007-6138-1

Guidelines for quality management of apallic syndrome / vegetative state. / Von Wild, Klaus; Gerstenbrand, Franz; Dolce, Giuliano; Binder, Heinrich; Vos, Pieter E.; Saltuari, Leopold; Alekseenko, Yuri; Formisano, Rita; Ritz, Annegret; Ortega-Suhrkamp, Erika; Jörg, Johannes R.; Potapov, Alexander A.; León-Carrión, José; Vilcinis, Rimantas; Zitnay, George A.

In: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Vol. 33, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 268-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Von Wild, K, Gerstenbrand, F, Dolce, G, Binder, H, Vos, PE, Saltuari, L, Alekseenko, Y, Formisano, R, Ritz, A, Ortega-Suhrkamp, E, Jörg, JR, Potapov, AA, León-Carrión, J, Vilcinis, R & Zitnay, GA 2007, 'Guidelines for quality management of apallic syndrome / vegetative state', European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 268-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-007-6138-1
Von Wild, Klaus ; Gerstenbrand, Franz ; Dolce, Giuliano ; Binder, Heinrich ; Vos, Pieter E. ; Saltuari, Leopold ; Alekseenko, Yuri ; Formisano, Rita ; Ritz, Annegret ; Ortega-Suhrkamp, Erika ; Jörg, Johannes R. ; Potapov, Alexander A. ; León-Carrión, José ; Vilcinis, Rimantas ; Zitnay, George A. / Guidelines for quality management of apallic syndrome / vegetative state. In: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 268-292.
@article{ada1b729996d44c785497b9cd50ae6a5,
title = "Guidelines for quality management of apallic syndrome / vegetative state",
abstract = "Epidemiology in Europe shows constantly increasing figures for the apallic syndrome (AS)/vegetative state (VS) as a consequence of advanced rescue, emergency services, intensive care treatment after acute brain damage and high-standard activating home nursing for completely dependent end-stage cases secondary to progressive neurological disease. Management of patients in irreversible permanent AS/VS has been the subject of sustained scientific and moral-legal debate over the past decade. A task force on guidelines for quality management of AS/VS was set up under the auspices of the Scientific Panel Neurotraumatology of the European Federation of Neurological Societies to address key issues relating to AS/VS prevalence and quality management. Collection and analysis of scientific data on class II (III) evidence from the literature and recommendations based on the best practice as resulting from the task force members' expertise are in accordance with EFNS Guidance regulations. The overall incidence of new AS/VS full stage cases all etiology is 0.5-2/100.000 population per year. About one third are traumatic and two thirds non traumatic cases. Increasing figures for hypoxic brain damage and progressive neurological disease have been noticed. The main conceptual criticism is based on the assessment and diagnosis of all different AS/VS stages based solely on behavioural findings without knowing the exact or uniform pathogenesis or neuropathological findings and the uncertainty of clinical assessment due to varying inclusion criteria. No special diagnostics, no specific medical management can be recommended for class II or III AS treatment and rehabilitation. This is why sine qua non diagnostics of the clinical features and appropriate treatment of AS/VS patients of {"}AS full, remission, defect and end stages{"} require further professional training and expertise for doctors and rehabilitation personnel. Management of AS aims at the social reintegration of patients or has to guarantee humanistic active nursing if treatment fails. Outcome depends on the cause and duration of AS/VS as well as patient's age. There is no single AS/VS specific laboratory investigation, no specific regimen or stimulating intervention to be recommended for improving higher cerebral functioning. Quality management requires at least 3 years of advanced training and permanent education to gain approval of qualification for AS/VS treatment and expertise. Sine qua non areas covering AS/VS institutions for early and long-term rehabilitation are required on a population base (prevalence of 2/100.000/year) to quicken functional restoration and to prevent or treat complications. Caring homes are needed for respectful humane nursing including basal sensor-motor stimulating techniques. Passive euthanasia is considered an act of mercy by physicians in terms of withholding treatment; however, ethical and legal issues with regard to withdrawal of nutrition and hydration and end of life discussions raise deep concerns. The aim of the guideline is to provide management guidance (on the best medical evidence class II and III or task force expertise) for neurologists, neurosurgeons, other physicians working with AS/VS patients, neurorehabilitation personnel, patients, next-of-kin, and health authorities. .",
keywords = "Apallic syndrome, Evidence-based medicine, Functional assessment, Management guideline, Multidisciplinary neurotraumatology, Neurorehabilitation, Outcome following severe brain damage, Vegetative state, Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration",
author = "{Von Wild}, Klaus and Franz Gerstenbrand and Giuliano Dolce and Heinrich Binder and Vos, {Pieter E.} and Leopold Saltuari and Yuri Alekseenko and Rita Formisano and Annegret Ritz and Erika Ortega-Suhrkamp and J{\"o}rg, {Johannes R.} and Potapov, {Alexander A.} and Jos{\'e} Le{\'o}n-Carri{\'o}n and Rimantas Vilcinis and Zitnay, {George A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00068-007-6138-1",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "268--292",
journal = "Unfallchirurgie",
issn = "0340-2649",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines for quality management of apallic syndrome / vegetative state

AU - Von Wild, Klaus

AU - Gerstenbrand, Franz

AU - Dolce, Giuliano

AU - Binder, Heinrich

AU - Vos, Pieter E.

AU - Saltuari, Leopold

AU - Alekseenko, Yuri

AU - Formisano, Rita

AU - Ritz, Annegret

AU - Ortega-Suhrkamp, Erika

AU - Jörg, Johannes R.

AU - Potapov, Alexander A.

AU - León-Carrión, José

AU - Vilcinis, Rimantas

AU - Zitnay, George A.

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Epidemiology in Europe shows constantly increasing figures for the apallic syndrome (AS)/vegetative state (VS) as a consequence of advanced rescue, emergency services, intensive care treatment after acute brain damage and high-standard activating home nursing for completely dependent end-stage cases secondary to progressive neurological disease. Management of patients in irreversible permanent AS/VS has been the subject of sustained scientific and moral-legal debate over the past decade. A task force on guidelines for quality management of AS/VS was set up under the auspices of the Scientific Panel Neurotraumatology of the European Federation of Neurological Societies to address key issues relating to AS/VS prevalence and quality management. Collection and analysis of scientific data on class II (III) evidence from the literature and recommendations based on the best practice as resulting from the task force members' expertise are in accordance with EFNS Guidance regulations. The overall incidence of new AS/VS full stage cases all etiology is 0.5-2/100.000 population per year. About one third are traumatic and two thirds non traumatic cases. Increasing figures for hypoxic brain damage and progressive neurological disease have been noticed. The main conceptual criticism is based on the assessment and diagnosis of all different AS/VS stages based solely on behavioural findings without knowing the exact or uniform pathogenesis or neuropathological findings and the uncertainty of clinical assessment due to varying inclusion criteria. No special diagnostics, no specific medical management can be recommended for class II or III AS treatment and rehabilitation. This is why sine qua non diagnostics of the clinical features and appropriate treatment of AS/VS patients of "AS full, remission, defect and end stages" require further professional training and expertise for doctors and rehabilitation personnel. Management of AS aims at the social reintegration of patients or has to guarantee humanistic active nursing if treatment fails. Outcome depends on the cause and duration of AS/VS as well as patient's age. There is no single AS/VS specific laboratory investigation, no specific regimen or stimulating intervention to be recommended for improving higher cerebral functioning. Quality management requires at least 3 years of advanced training and permanent education to gain approval of qualification for AS/VS treatment and expertise. Sine qua non areas covering AS/VS institutions for early and long-term rehabilitation are required on a population base (prevalence of 2/100.000/year) to quicken functional restoration and to prevent or treat complications. Caring homes are needed for respectful humane nursing including basal sensor-motor stimulating techniques. Passive euthanasia is considered an act of mercy by physicians in terms of withholding treatment; however, ethical and legal issues with regard to withdrawal of nutrition and hydration and end of life discussions raise deep concerns. The aim of the guideline is to provide management guidance (on the best medical evidence class II and III or task force expertise) for neurologists, neurosurgeons, other physicians working with AS/VS patients, neurorehabilitation personnel, patients, next-of-kin, and health authorities. .

AB - Epidemiology in Europe shows constantly increasing figures for the apallic syndrome (AS)/vegetative state (VS) as a consequence of advanced rescue, emergency services, intensive care treatment after acute brain damage and high-standard activating home nursing for completely dependent end-stage cases secondary to progressive neurological disease. Management of patients in irreversible permanent AS/VS has been the subject of sustained scientific and moral-legal debate over the past decade. A task force on guidelines for quality management of AS/VS was set up under the auspices of the Scientific Panel Neurotraumatology of the European Federation of Neurological Societies to address key issues relating to AS/VS prevalence and quality management. Collection and analysis of scientific data on class II (III) evidence from the literature and recommendations based on the best practice as resulting from the task force members' expertise are in accordance with EFNS Guidance regulations. The overall incidence of new AS/VS full stage cases all etiology is 0.5-2/100.000 population per year. About one third are traumatic and two thirds non traumatic cases. Increasing figures for hypoxic brain damage and progressive neurological disease have been noticed. The main conceptual criticism is based on the assessment and diagnosis of all different AS/VS stages based solely on behavioural findings without knowing the exact or uniform pathogenesis or neuropathological findings and the uncertainty of clinical assessment due to varying inclusion criteria. No special diagnostics, no specific medical management can be recommended for class II or III AS treatment and rehabilitation. This is why sine qua non diagnostics of the clinical features and appropriate treatment of AS/VS patients of "AS full, remission, defect and end stages" require further professional training and expertise for doctors and rehabilitation personnel. Management of AS aims at the social reintegration of patients or has to guarantee humanistic active nursing if treatment fails. Outcome depends on the cause and duration of AS/VS as well as patient's age. There is no single AS/VS specific laboratory investigation, no specific regimen or stimulating intervention to be recommended for improving higher cerebral functioning. Quality management requires at least 3 years of advanced training and permanent education to gain approval of qualification for AS/VS treatment and expertise. Sine qua non areas covering AS/VS institutions for early and long-term rehabilitation are required on a population base (prevalence of 2/100.000/year) to quicken functional restoration and to prevent or treat complications. Caring homes are needed for respectful humane nursing including basal sensor-motor stimulating techniques. Passive euthanasia is considered an act of mercy by physicians in terms of withholding treatment; however, ethical and legal issues with regard to withdrawal of nutrition and hydration and end of life discussions raise deep concerns. The aim of the guideline is to provide management guidance (on the best medical evidence class II and III or task force expertise) for neurologists, neurosurgeons, other physicians working with AS/VS patients, neurorehabilitation personnel, patients, next-of-kin, and health authorities. .

KW - Apallic syndrome

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Functional assessment

KW - Management guideline

KW - Multidisciplinary neurotraumatology

KW - Neurorehabilitation

KW - Outcome following severe brain damage

KW - Vegetative state

KW - Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547419722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547419722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00068-007-6138-1

DO - 10.1007/s00068-007-6138-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34547419722

VL - 33

SP - 268

EP - 292

JO - Unfallchirurgie

JF - Unfallchirurgie

SN - 0340-2649

IS - 3

ER -