Guidelines for time-to-event end point definitions in breast cancer trials: Results of the DATECAN initiative (Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials)

Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade, D. Cameron, P. Poortmans, B. Asselain, D. Azria, F. Cardoso, R. A'Hern, J. Bliss, J. Bogaerts, H. Bonnefoi, E. Brain, M. J. Cardoso, B. Chibaudel, R. Coleman, T. Cufer, L. Dal Lago, F. Dalenc, E. De Azambuja, M. Debled, S. DelalogeT. Filleron, J. Gligorov, M. Gutowski, W. Jacot, C. Kirkove, G. MacGrogan, S. Michiels, I. Negreiros, B. V. Offersen, F. Penault Llorca, G. Pruneri, H. Roche, N. S. Russell, F. Schmitt, V. Servent, B. Thürlimann, M. Untch, J. A. van der Hage, G. van Tienhoven, H. Wildiers, J. Yarnold, F. Bonnetain, S. Mathoulin-Pélissier, C. Bellera, T. S. Dabakuyo-Yonli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Using surrogate end points for overall survival, such as disease-free survival, is increasingly common in randomized controlled trials. However, the definitions of several of these time-to-event (TTE) end points are imprecisely which limits interpretation and cross-trial comparisons. The estimation of treatment effects may be directly affected by the definitions of end points. The DATECAN initiative (Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials) aims to provide recommendations for definitions of TTE end points. We report guidelines for randomized cancer clinical trials (RCTs) in breast cancer. Patients and methods: A literature review was carried out to identify TTE end points (primary or secondary) reported in publications of randomized trials or guidelines. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts proposed recommendations for the definitions of these end points based on a validated consensus method that formalize the degree of agreement among experts. Results: Recommended guidelines for the definitions of TTE end points commonly used in RCTs for breast cancer are provided for non-metastatic and metastatic settings. Conclusion: The use of standardized definitions should facilitate comparisons of trial results and improve the quality of trial design and reporting. These guidelines could be of particular interest to those involved in the design, conducting, reporting, or assessment of RCT.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbermdv106
Pages (from-to)873-879
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2015

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Efficacy measure
  • Guidelines
  • Randomized, controlled trial
  • Time-to-event end point

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Hematology

Cite this

Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Cameron, D., Poortmans, P., Asselain, B., Azria, D., Cardoso, F., A'Hern, R., Bliss, J., Bogaerts, J., Bonnefoi, H., Brain, E., Cardoso, M. J., Chibaudel, B., Coleman, R., Cufer, T., Dal Lago, L., Dalenc, F., De Azambuja, E., Debled, M., ... Dabakuyo-Yonli, T. S. (2015). Guidelines for time-to-event end point definitions in breast cancer trials: Results of the DATECAN initiative (Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials). Annals of Oncology, 26(5), 873-879. [mdv106]. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv106