Guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: a critical appraisal

Giorgio Costantino, Gian Marco Podda, Lorenzo Falsetti, Primiano Iannone, Ana Lages, Alberto M. Marra, Maristella Masala, Olaug Marie Reiakvam, Florentia Savva, Jan Schovanek, Sjoerd van Bree, Inês João da Silva Chora, Graziella Privitera, Silvio Ragozzino, Matthias von Rotz, Lycke Woittiez, Christopher Davidson, Nicola Montano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several guidelines often exist on the same topic, sometimes offering divergent recommendations. For the clinician, it can be difficult to understand the reasons for this divergence and how to select the right recommendations. The aim of this study is to compare different guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), and provide practical and affordable advice on its management in the acute setting. A PubMed search was performed in May 2014 to identify the three most recent and cited published guidelines on AF. During the 1-week school of the European School of Internal Medicine, the attending residents were divided in five working groups. The three selected guidelines were compared with five specific questions. The guidelines identified were: the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on AF, the Canadian guidelines on emergency department management of AF, and the American Heart Association guidelines on AF. Twenty-one relevant sub-questions were identified. For five of these, there was no agreement between guidelines; for three, there was partial agreement; for three data were not available (issue not covered by one of the guidelines), while for ten, there was complete agreement. Evidence on the management of AF in the acute setting is largely based on expert opinion rather than clinical trials. While there is broad agreement on the management of the haemodynamically unstable patient and the use of drugs for rate-control strategy, there is less agreement on drug therapy for rhythm control and no agreement on several other topics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)693-703
Number of pages11
JournalInternal and Emergency Medicine
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Atrial Fibrillation
Hospital Emergency Service
Guidelines
Drug and Narcotic Control
Expert Testimony
Internal Medicine
PubMed
Clinical Trials
Drug Therapy

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Critical appraisal
  • Emergency department
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department : a critical appraisal. / Costantino, Giorgio; Podda, Gian Marco; Falsetti, Lorenzo; Iannone, Primiano; Lages, Ana; Marra, Alberto M.; Masala, Maristella; Reiakvam, Olaug Marie; Savva, Florentia; Schovanek, Jan; van Bree, Sjoerd; da Silva Chora, Inês João; Privitera, Graziella; Ragozzino, Silvio; von Rotz, Matthias; Woittiez, Lycke; Davidson, Christopher; Montano, Nicola.

In: Internal and Emergency Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2017, p. 693-703.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Costantino, G, Podda, GM, Falsetti, L, Iannone, P, Lages, A, Marra, AM, Masala, M, Reiakvam, OM, Savva, F, Schovanek, J, van Bree, S, da Silva Chora, IJ, Privitera, G, Ragozzino, S, von Rotz, M, Woittiez, L, Davidson, C & Montano, N 2017, 'Guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: a critical appraisal', Internal and Emergency Medicine, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 693-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1580-x
Costantino, Giorgio ; Podda, Gian Marco ; Falsetti, Lorenzo ; Iannone, Primiano ; Lages, Ana ; Marra, Alberto M. ; Masala, Maristella ; Reiakvam, Olaug Marie ; Savva, Florentia ; Schovanek, Jan ; van Bree, Sjoerd ; da Silva Chora, Inês João ; Privitera, Graziella ; Ragozzino, Silvio ; von Rotz, Matthias ; Woittiez, Lycke ; Davidson, Christopher ; Montano, Nicola. / Guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department : a critical appraisal. In: Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 5. pp. 693-703.
@article{21a499a675344a7c8203eaf13bfa25e8,
title = "Guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: a critical appraisal",
abstract = "Several guidelines often exist on the same topic, sometimes offering divergent recommendations. For the clinician, it can be difficult to understand the reasons for this divergence and how to select the right recommendations. The aim of this study is to compare different guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), and provide practical and affordable advice on its management in the acute setting. A PubMed search was performed in May 2014 to identify the three most recent and cited published guidelines on AF. During the 1-week school of the European School of Internal Medicine, the attending residents were divided in five working groups. The three selected guidelines were compared with five specific questions. The guidelines identified were: the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on AF, the Canadian guidelines on emergency department management of AF, and the American Heart Association guidelines on AF. Twenty-one relevant sub-questions were identified. For five of these, there was no agreement between guidelines; for three, there was partial agreement; for three data were not available (issue not covered by one of the guidelines), while for ten, there was complete agreement. Evidence on the management of AF in the acute setting is largely based on expert opinion rather than clinical trials. While there is broad agreement on the management of the haemodynamically unstable patient and the use of drugs for rate-control strategy, there is less agreement on drug therapy for rhythm control and no agreement on several other topics.",
keywords = "Atrial fibrillation, Critical appraisal, Emergency department, Evidence-based medicine, Guidelines",
author = "Giorgio Costantino and Podda, {Gian Marco} and Lorenzo Falsetti and Primiano Iannone and Ana Lages and Marra, {Alberto M.} and Maristella Masala and Reiakvam, {Olaug Marie} and Florentia Savva and Jan Schovanek and {van Bree}, Sjoerd and {da Silva Chora}, {In{\^e}s Jo{\~a}o} and Graziella Privitera and Silvio Ragozzino and {von Rotz}, Matthias and Lycke Woittiez and Christopher Davidson and Nicola Montano",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s11739-016-1580-x",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "693--703",
journal = "Internal and Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1828-0447",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department

T2 - a critical appraisal

AU - Costantino, Giorgio

AU - Podda, Gian Marco

AU - Falsetti, Lorenzo

AU - Iannone, Primiano

AU - Lages, Ana

AU - Marra, Alberto M.

AU - Masala, Maristella

AU - Reiakvam, Olaug Marie

AU - Savva, Florentia

AU - Schovanek, Jan

AU - van Bree, Sjoerd

AU - da Silva Chora, Inês João

AU - Privitera, Graziella

AU - Ragozzino, Silvio

AU - von Rotz, Matthias

AU - Woittiez, Lycke

AU - Davidson, Christopher

AU - Montano, Nicola

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Several guidelines often exist on the same topic, sometimes offering divergent recommendations. For the clinician, it can be difficult to understand the reasons for this divergence and how to select the right recommendations. The aim of this study is to compare different guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), and provide practical and affordable advice on its management in the acute setting. A PubMed search was performed in May 2014 to identify the three most recent and cited published guidelines on AF. During the 1-week school of the European School of Internal Medicine, the attending residents were divided in five working groups. The three selected guidelines were compared with five specific questions. The guidelines identified were: the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on AF, the Canadian guidelines on emergency department management of AF, and the American Heart Association guidelines on AF. Twenty-one relevant sub-questions were identified. For five of these, there was no agreement between guidelines; for three, there was partial agreement; for three data were not available (issue not covered by one of the guidelines), while for ten, there was complete agreement. Evidence on the management of AF in the acute setting is largely based on expert opinion rather than clinical trials. While there is broad agreement on the management of the haemodynamically unstable patient and the use of drugs for rate-control strategy, there is less agreement on drug therapy for rhythm control and no agreement on several other topics.

AB - Several guidelines often exist on the same topic, sometimes offering divergent recommendations. For the clinician, it can be difficult to understand the reasons for this divergence and how to select the right recommendations. The aim of this study is to compare different guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), and provide practical and affordable advice on its management in the acute setting. A PubMed search was performed in May 2014 to identify the three most recent and cited published guidelines on AF. During the 1-week school of the European School of Internal Medicine, the attending residents were divided in five working groups. The three selected guidelines were compared with five specific questions. The guidelines identified were: the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on AF, the Canadian guidelines on emergency department management of AF, and the American Heart Association guidelines on AF. Twenty-one relevant sub-questions were identified. For five of these, there was no agreement between guidelines; for three, there was partial agreement; for three data were not available (issue not covered by one of the guidelines), while for ten, there was complete agreement. Evidence on the management of AF in the acute setting is largely based on expert opinion rather than clinical trials. While there is broad agreement on the management of the haemodynamically unstable patient and the use of drugs for rate-control strategy, there is less agreement on drug therapy for rhythm control and no agreement on several other topics.

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Critical appraisal

KW - Emergency department

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000788340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85000788340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11739-016-1580-x

DO - 10.1007/s11739-016-1580-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85000788340

VL - 12

SP - 693

EP - 703

JO - Internal and Emergency Medicine

JF - Internal and Emergency Medicine

SN - 1828-0447

IS - 5

ER -