Hazelnut allergy

A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study

Claudio Ortolani, Barbara K. Ballmer-Weber, Kirsten Skamstrup Hansen, Marco Ispano, Brunello Wüthrich, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen, Raffaella Ansaloni, Luciana Vannucci, Valerio Pravettoni, Joseph Scibilia, Lars K. Poulsen, Elide A. Pastorello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Tree nuts are a common cause of food allergy in Europe. However, few studies deal with real food allergy to hazelnuts in subjects believed to be allergic to this food. Objective: We sought to select subjects with a history of allergic reactions on ingestion of hazelnut and determine how many of these have true allergy by means of the double-blind, placebo- controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Methods: Eighty-six subjects with a history of symptoms after hazelnut ingestion were recruited from 3 allergy centers (Milan, Zurich, and Copenhagen). All subjects underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with aeroallergens and hazelnut, as well as having their specific hazelnut IgE levels determined. Diagnosis of clinical relevant food allergy was made on the basis of the DBPCFC. Results: Sixty-seven (77.9%) of 86 subjects had a positive DBPCFC result; 8 were placebo responders, and 11 were nonresponders. Of the 11 nonresponders, 4 had positive open-challenge test results. Of the DBPCFC-positive subjects, 87% also had positive skin test responses to birch pollen extract. Specific IgE determination for hazelnut (positive CAP response ≥0.7 kU/L [ie, class 2]) showed a sensitivity of 0.75, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.92, a specificity of 0.16, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.05. Skin tests with commercial hazelnut extract produced a sensitivity of 0.89, a PPV of 0.92, a specificity of 0.05, and an NPV of 0.05. Skin tests with natural food produced a sensitivity of 0.88, a PPV of 0.94, a specificity of 0.27, and an NPV of 0.15. Conclusion: This study shows that hazelnut is an allergenic source that can cause real food allergy, as confirmed by DBPCFC. Skin and IgE tests demonstrated reasonable sensitivity and PPV but a very low specificity and NPV, thus implying that these should not be used to validate the diagnosis of food allergy to hazelnut.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-581
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume105
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Corylus
Multicenter Studies
Hypersensitivity
Placebos
Food Hypersensitivity
Food
Skin Tests
Immunoglobulin E
Eating
Betula
Nuts
Pollen

Keywords

  • Double- blind
  • Food allergy
  • Hazelnut allergy
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Oral allergy syndrome
  • Placebo-controlled food challenge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

Ortolani, C., Ballmer-Weber, B. K., Hansen, K. S., Ispano, M., Wüthrich, B., Bindslev-Jensen, C., ... Pastorello, E. A. (2000). Hazelnut allergy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 105(3), 577-581.

Hazelnut allergy : A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study. / Ortolani, Claudio; Ballmer-Weber, Barbara K.; Hansen, Kirsten Skamstrup; Ispano, Marco; Wüthrich, Brunello; Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten; Ansaloni, Raffaella; Vannucci, Luciana; Pravettoni, Valerio; Scibilia, Joseph; Poulsen, Lars K.; Pastorello, Elide A.

In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 105, No. 3, 2000, p. 577-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ortolani, C, Ballmer-Weber, BK, Hansen, KS, Ispano, M, Wüthrich, B, Bindslev-Jensen, C, Ansaloni, R, Vannucci, L, Pravettoni, V, Scibilia, J, Poulsen, LK & Pastorello, EA 2000, 'Hazelnut allergy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study', Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 577-581.
Ortolani C, Ballmer-Weber BK, Hansen KS, Ispano M, Wüthrich B, Bindslev-Jensen C et al. Hazelnut allergy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2000;105(3):577-581.
Ortolani, Claudio ; Ballmer-Weber, Barbara K. ; Hansen, Kirsten Skamstrup ; Ispano, Marco ; Wüthrich, Brunello ; Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten ; Ansaloni, Raffaella ; Vannucci, Luciana ; Pravettoni, Valerio ; Scibilia, Joseph ; Poulsen, Lars K. ; Pastorello, Elide A. / Hazelnut allergy : A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study. In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2000 ; Vol. 105, No. 3. pp. 577-581.
@article{123599891b284697b6403f1e82fb00bf,
title = "Hazelnut allergy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study",
abstract = "Background: Tree nuts are a common cause of food allergy in Europe. However, few studies deal with real food allergy to hazelnuts in subjects believed to be allergic to this food. Objective: We sought to select subjects with a history of allergic reactions on ingestion of hazelnut and determine how many of these have true allergy by means of the double-blind, placebo- controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Methods: Eighty-six subjects with a history of symptoms after hazelnut ingestion were recruited from 3 allergy centers (Milan, Zurich, and Copenhagen). All subjects underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with aeroallergens and hazelnut, as well as having their specific hazelnut IgE levels determined. Diagnosis of clinical relevant food allergy was made on the basis of the DBPCFC. Results: Sixty-seven (77.9{\%}) of 86 subjects had a positive DBPCFC result; 8 were placebo responders, and 11 were nonresponders. Of the 11 nonresponders, 4 had positive open-challenge test results. Of the DBPCFC-positive subjects, 87{\%} also had positive skin test responses to birch pollen extract. Specific IgE determination for hazelnut (positive CAP response ≥0.7 kU/L [ie, class 2]) showed a sensitivity of 0.75, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.92, a specificity of 0.16, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.05. Skin tests with commercial hazelnut extract produced a sensitivity of 0.89, a PPV of 0.92, a specificity of 0.05, and an NPV of 0.05. Skin tests with natural food produced a sensitivity of 0.88, a PPV of 0.94, a specificity of 0.27, and an NPV of 0.15. Conclusion: This study shows that hazelnut is an allergenic source that can cause real food allergy, as confirmed by DBPCFC. Skin and IgE tests demonstrated reasonable sensitivity and PPV but a very low specificity and NPV, thus implying that these should not be used to validate the diagnosis of food allergy to hazelnut.",
keywords = "Double- blind, Food allergy, Hazelnut allergy, Hypersensitivity, Oral allergy syndrome, Placebo-controlled food challenge",
author = "Claudio Ortolani and Ballmer-Weber, {Barbara K.} and Hansen, {Kirsten Skamstrup} and Marco Ispano and Brunello W{\"u}thrich and Carsten Bindslev-Jensen and Raffaella Ansaloni and Luciana Vannucci and Valerio Pravettoni and Joseph Scibilia and Poulsen, {Lars K.} and Pastorello, {Elide A.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "577--581",
journal = "Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "0091-6749",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hazelnut allergy

T2 - A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study

AU - Ortolani, Claudio

AU - Ballmer-Weber, Barbara K.

AU - Hansen, Kirsten Skamstrup

AU - Ispano, Marco

AU - Wüthrich, Brunello

AU - Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten

AU - Ansaloni, Raffaella

AU - Vannucci, Luciana

AU - Pravettoni, Valerio

AU - Scibilia, Joseph

AU - Poulsen, Lars K.

AU - Pastorello, Elide A.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Background: Tree nuts are a common cause of food allergy in Europe. However, few studies deal with real food allergy to hazelnuts in subjects believed to be allergic to this food. Objective: We sought to select subjects with a history of allergic reactions on ingestion of hazelnut and determine how many of these have true allergy by means of the double-blind, placebo- controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Methods: Eighty-six subjects with a history of symptoms after hazelnut ingestion were recruited from 3 allergy centers (Milan, Zurich, and Copenhagen). All subjects underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with aeroallergens and hazelnut, as well as having their specific hazelnut IgE levels determined. Diagnosis of clinical relevant food allergy was made on the basis of the DBPCFC. Results: Sixty-seven (77.9%) of 86 subjects had a positive DBPCFC result; 8 were placebo responders, and 11 were nonresponders. Of the 11 nonresponders, 4 had positive open-challenge test results. Of the DBPCFC-positive subjects, 87% also had positive skin test responses to birch pollen extract. Specific IgE determination for hazelnut (positive CAP response ≥0.7 kU/L [ie, class 2]) showed a sensitivity of 0.75, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.92, a specificity of 0.16, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.05. Skin tests with commercial hazelnut extract produced a sensitivity of 0.89, a PPV of 0.92, a specificity of 0.05, and an NPV of 0.05. Skin tests with natural food produced a sensitivity of 0.88, a PPV of 0.94, a specificity of 0.27, and an NPV of 0.15. Conclusion: This study shows that hazelnut is an allergenic source that can cause real food allergy, as confirmed by DBPCFC. Skin and IgE tests demonstrated reasonable sensitivity and PPV but a very low specificity and NPV, thus implying that these should not be used to validate the diagnosis of food allergy to hazelnut.

AB - Background: Tree nuts are a common cause of food allergy in Europe. However, few studies deal with real food allergy to hazelnuts in subjects believed to be allergic to this food. Objective: We sought to select subjects with a history of allergic reactions on ingestion of hazelnut and determine how many of these have true allergy by means of the double-blind, placebo- controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Methods: Eighty-six subjects with a history of symptoms after hazelnut ingestion were recruited from 3 allergy centers (Milan, Zurich, and Copenhagen). All subjects underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with aeroallergens and hazelnut, as well as having their specific hazelnut IgE levels determined. Diagnosis of clinical relevant food allergy was made on the basis of the DBPCFC. Results: Sixty-seven (77.9%) of 86 subjects had a positive DBPCFC result; 8 were placebo responders, and 11 were nonresponders. Of the 11 nonresponders, 4 had positive open-challenge test results. Of the DBPCFC-positive subjects, 87% also had positive skin test responses to birch pollen extract. Specific IgE determination for hazelnut (positive CAP response ≥0.7 kU/L [ie, class 2]) showed a sensitivity of 0.75, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.92, a specificity of 0.16, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.05. Skin tests with commercial hazelnut extract produced a sensitivity of 0.89, a PPV of 0.92, a specificity of 0.05, and an NPV of 0.05. Skin tests with natural food produced a sensitivity of 0.88, a PPV of 0.94, a specificity of 0.27, and an NPV of 0.15. Conclusion: This study shows that hazelnut is an allergenic source that can cause real food allergy, as confirmed by DBPCFC. Skin and IgE tests demonstrated reasonable sensitivity and PPV but a very low specificity and NPV, thus implying that these should not be used to validate the diagnosis of food allergy to hazelnut.

KW - Double- blind

KW - Food allergy

KW - Hazelnut allergy

KW - Hypersensitivity

KW - Oral allergy syndrome

KW - Placebo-controlled food challenge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034028567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034028567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 577

EP - 581

JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

SN - 0091-6749

IS - 3

ER -