Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor

Maria Elena Flacco, Lamberto Manzoli, Stefania Boccia, Lorenzo Capasso, Katina Aleksovska, Annalisa Rosso, Giacomo Scaioli, Corrado De Vito, Roberta Siliquini, Paolo Villari, John P A Ioannidis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives To map the current status of head-to-head comparative randomized evidence and to assess whether funding may impact on trial design and results. Study Design and Setting From a 50% random sample of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in journals indexed in PubMed during 2011, we selected the trials with

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)811-820
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume68
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

PubMed
Industry
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Conflict of interest
  • Cross-sectional study
  • Head-to-head comparison
  • Industry sponsorship
  • Noninferiority trials
  • Randomized controlled trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor. / Flacco, Maria Elena; Manzoli, Lamberto; Boccia, Stefania; Capasso, Lorenzo; Aleksovska, Katina; Rosso, Annalisa; Scaioli, Giacomo; De Vito, Corrado; Siliquini, Roberta; Villari, Paolo; Ioannidis, John P A.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 68, No. 7, 01.07.2015, p. 811-820.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flacco, ME, Manzoli, L, Boccia, S, Capasso, L, Aleksovska, K, Rosso, A, Scaioli, G, De Vito, C, Siliquini, R, Villari, P & Ioannidis, JPA 2015, 'Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 811-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.016
Flacco, Maria Elena ; Manzoli, Lamberto ; Boccia, Stefania ; Capasso, Lorenzo ; Aleksovska, Katina ; Rosso, Annalisa ; Scaioli, Giacomo ; De Vito, Corrado ; Siliquini, Roberta ; Villari, Paolo ; Ioannidis, John P A. / Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2015 ; Vol. 68, No. 7. pp. 811-820.
@article{19e0f5971d174d0e95ecd6c324dcfd1a,
title = "Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor",
abstract = "Objectives To map the current status of head-to-head comparative randomized evidence and to assess whether funding may impact on trial design and results. Study Design and Setting From a 50{\%} random sample of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in journals indexed in PubMed during 2011, we selected the trials with",
keywords = "Conflict of interest, Cross-sectional study, Head-to-head comparison, Industry sponsorship, Noninferiority trials, Randomized controlled trials",
author = "Flacco, {Maria Elena} and Lamberto Manzoli and Stefania Boccia and Lorenzo Capasso and Katina Aleksovska and Annalisa Rosso and Giacomo Scaioli and {De Vito}, Corrado and Roberta Siliquini and Paolo Villari and Ioannidis, {John P A}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.016",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "811--820",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor

AU - Flacco, Maria Elena

AU - Manzoli, Lamberto

AU - Boccia, Stefania

AU - Capasso, Lorenzo

AU - Aleksovska, Katina

AU - Rosso, Annalisa

AU - Scaioli, Giacomo

AU - De Vito, Corrado

AU - Siliquini, Roberta

AU - Villari, Paolo

AU - Ioannidis, John P A

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Objectives To map the current status of head-to-head comparative randomized evidence and to assess whether funding may impact on trial design and results. Study Design and Setting From a 50% random sample of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in journals indexed in PubMed during 2011, we selected the trials with

AB - Objectives To map the current status of head-to-head comparative randomized evidence and to assess whether funding may impact on trial design and results. Study Design and Setting From a 50% random sample of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in journals indexed in PubMed during 2011, we selected the trials with

KW - Conflict of interest

KW - Cross-sectional study

KW - Head-to-head comparison

KW - Industry sponsorship

KW - Noninferiority trials

KW - Randomized controlled trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930577263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930577263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 25748073

AN - SCOPUS:84930577263

VL - 68

SP - 811

EP - 820

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 7

ER -