Health care resources consumed to treat postoperative infections: Cost saving by perioperative immunonutrition

Luca Gianotti, Marco Braga, Andreas Frei, Roger Greiner, Valerio Di Carlo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to calculate the costs of postoperative complications and to evaluate whether the use of perioperative enteral immunonutrition, may lead to a saving in health care resources consumed. The economic analysis was based on data from a randomized double-blind trial that include 206 cancer patients who received perioperatively either enteral immunonutrition (treatment group, n = 102) or a standard enteral diet (control group, n = 104). Estimates of costs were based on resource use for treatment of complications, which were valued according to the National List of Sanitary Costs of the Italian Ministry of Health and on the medical Diagnosis-Related-Group (DRG) reimbursement rates. Costs of nutrition were also calculated. Cost comparison and cost effectiveness analyses were then carried out. Intent-to-treat analysis showed that the total costs of 52 postoperative complications were 322,218 euros, with a consumption of the DRG reimbursement rate of 15.4%. The costs of nutrition were 35,437 euros in the treatment group versus 10,768 euros in the control group. The total costs (nutrition plus treating complications) amounted to 113,778 euros in the treatment group versus 254,450 euros in the control group. The mean total costs per patient were 1,115 euros in the treatment group versus 2,447 euros in the control group (P = 0.04). Effectiveness was 83.3% in the treatment group versus 68.3% in the control group (P = 0.009). Cost effectiveness analysis showed a net saving of 2,386 euros per complication-free patient in favor of the treatment group. In conclusion, the perioperative use of immunonutrition appears cost effective due to a substantial saving of resources used to treat postoperative complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-330
Number of pages6
JournalShock
Volume14
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2000

Fingerprint

Health Resources
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Infection
Control Groups
Small Intestine
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Therapeutics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Economics
Diet

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Costs
  • Enteral nutrition
  • Immunonutrition
  • Infection
  • Outcome
  • Postoperative complication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Health care resources consumed to treat postoperative infections : Cost saving by perioperative immunonutrition. / Gianotti, Luca; Braga, Marco; Frei, Andreas; Greiner, Roger; Di Carlo, Valerio.

In: Shock, Vol. 14, No. 3, 09.2000, p. 325-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gianotti, L, Braga, M, Frei, A, Greiner, R & Di Carlo, V 2000, 'Health care resources consumed to treat postoperative infections: Cost saving by perioperative immunonutrition', Shock, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 325-330.
Gianotti, Luca ; Braga, Marco ; Frei, Andreas ; Greiner, Roger ; Di Carlo, Valerio. / Health care resources consumed to treat postoperative infections : Cost saving by perioperative immunonutrition. In: Shock. 2000 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 325-330.
@article{398fd364e8364c84b0bd8c931a1bab17,
title = "Health care resources consumed to treat postoperative infections: Cost saving by perioperative immunonutrition",
abstract = "The objectives of the study were to calculate the costs of postoperative complications and to evaluate whether the use of perioperative enteral immunonutrition, may lead to a saving in health care resources consumed. The economic analysis was based on data from a randomized double-blind trial that include 206 cancer patients who received perioperatively either enteral immunonutrition (treatment group, n = 102) or a standard enteral diet (control group, n = 104). Estimates of costs were based on resource use for treatment of complications, which were valued according to the National List of Sanitary Costs of the Italian Ministry of Health and on the medical Diagnosis-Related-Group (DRG) reimbursement rates. Costs of nutrition were also calculated. Cost comparison and cost effectiveness analyses were then carried out. Intent-to-treat analysis showed that the total costs of 52 postoperative complications were 322,218 euros, with a consumption of the DRG reimbursement rate of 15.4{\%}. The costs of nutrition were 35,437 euros in the treatment group versus 10,768 euros in the control group. The total costs (nutrition plus treating complications) amounted to 113,778 euros in the treatment group versus 254,450 euros in the control group. The mean total costs per patient were 1,115 euros in the treatment group versus 2,447 euros in the control group (P = 0.04). Effectiveness was 83.3{\%} in the treatment group versus 68.3{\%} in the control group (P = 0.009). Cost effectiveness analysis showed a net saving of 2,386 euros per complication-free patient in favor of the treatment group. In conclusion, the perioperative use of immunonutrition appears cost effective due to a substantial saving of resources used to treat postoperative complications.",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness analysis, Costs, Enteral nutrition, Immunonutrition, Infection, Outcome, Postoperative complication",
author = "Luca Gianotti and Marco Braga and Andreas Frei and Roger Greiner and {Di Carlo}, Valerio",
year = "2000",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "325--330",
journal = "Shock",
issn = "1073-2322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health care resources consumed to treat postoperative infections

T2 - Cost saving by perioperative immunonutrition

AU - Gianotti, Luca

AU - Braga, Marco

AU - Frei, Andreas

AU - Greiner, Roger

AU - Di Carlo, Valerio

PY - 2000/9

Y1 - 2000/9

N2 - The objectives of the study were to calculate the costs of postoperative complications and to evaluate whether the use of perioperative enteral immunonutrition, may lead to a saving in health care resources consumed. The economic analysis was based on data from a randomized double-blind trial that include 206 cancer patients who received perioperatively either enteral immunonutrition (treatment group, n = 102) or a standard enteral diet (control group, n = 104). Estimates of costs were based on resource use for treatment of complications, which were valued according to the National List of Sanitary Costs of the Italian Ministry of Health and on the medical Diagnosis-Related-Group (DRG) reimbursement rates. Costs of nutrition were also calculated. Cost comparison and cost effectiveness analyses were then carried out. Intent-to-treat analysis showed that the total costs of 52 postoperative complications were 322,218 euros, with a consumption of the DRG reimbursement rate of 15.4%. The costs of nutrition were 35,437 euros in the treatment group versus 10,768 euros in the control group. The total costs (nutrition plus treating complications) amounted to 113,778 euros in the treatment group versus 254,450 euros in the control group. The mean total costs per patient were 1,115 euros in the treatment group versus 2,447 euros in the control group (P = 0.04). Effectiveness was 83.3% in the treatment group versus 68.3% in the control group (P = 0.009). Cost effectiveness analysis showed a net saving of 2,386 euros per complication-free patient in favor of the treatment group. In conclusion, the perioperative use of immunonutrition appears cost effective due to a substantial saving of resources used to treat postoperative complications.

AB - The objectives of the study were to calculate the costs of postoperative complications and to evaluate whether the use of perioperative enteral immunonutrition, may lead to a saving in health care resources consumed. The economic analysis was based on data from a randomized double-blind trial that include 206 cancer patients who received perioperatively either enteral immunonutrition (treatment group, n = 102) or a standard enteral diet (control group, n = 104). Estimates of costs were based on resource use for treatment of complications, which were valued according to the National List of Sanitary Costs of the Italian Ministry of Health and on the medical Diagnosis-Related-Group (DRG) reimbursement rates. Costs of nutrition were also calculated. Cost comparison and cost effectiveness analyses were then carried out. Intent-to-treat analysis showed that the total costs of 52 postoperative complications were 322,218 euros, with a consumption of the DRG reimbursement rate of 15.4%. The costs of nutrition were 35,437 euros in the treatment group versus 10,768 euros in the control group. The total costs (nutrition plus treating complications) amounted to 113,778 euros in the treatment group versus 254,450 euros in the control group. The mean total costs per patient were 1,115 euros in the treatment group versus 2,447 euros in the control group (P = 0.04). Effectiveness was 83.3% in the treatment group versus 68.3% in the control group (P = 0.009). Cost effectiveness analysis showed a net saving of 2,386 euros per complication-free patient in favor of the treatment group. In conclusion, the perioperative use of immunonutrition appears cost effective due to a substantial saving of resources used to treat postoperative complications.

KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - Costs

KW - Enteral nutrition

KW - Immunonutrition

KW - Infection

KW - Outcome

KW - Postoperative complication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034280677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034280677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11028551

AN - SCOPUS:0034280677

VL - 14

SP - 325

EP - 330

JO - Shock

JF - Shock

SN - 1073-2322

IS - 3

ER -