Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and migraine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the genuine interest in measuring qualitative aspects of life has increased in the medical field together with our capability to transform patients' subjective reports, opinions and ratings in standardized pieces of information, the debate about the true objective to measure, the focus and the terminology is still lively. Many instruments, both generic and disease-tailored, have been developed, tested and used in headache and migraine patients. Advances in the field of health outcome assessment have made available a new generation of approaches and measures, both specific and generic, that are based on an approach called dynamic assessment. According to the developers, it is now possible to produce valid and reliable estimates of a person's perception of health by asking only those questions relevant to the individual respondent's state. Despite the large body of evidence about the intrinsic value of such new methodology, its "incremental" value when applied in research projects or in the context of programs of disease or outcome management is yet not clear. Thus, before these new methods are experimentally compared with more traditional approaches, in the general population and in headache and migraine patients, caution should be recommended and their use should be avoided outside formal research projects.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Headache and Pain
Volume2
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Migraine Disorders
Quality of Life
Health
Research
Terminology
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population

Keywords

  • Computer adaptive testing
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Migraine
  • Quality of life
  • QualyMetric
  • SF-36

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and migraine. / Apolone, G.; Mosconi, P.

In: Journal of Headache and Pain, Vol. 2, No. SUPPL. 1, 2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b48b57ab4d0947888932fa939350e838,
title = "Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and migraine",
abstract = "Although the genuine interest in measuring qualitative aspects of life has increased in the medical field together with our capability to transform patients' subjective reports, opinions and ratings in standardized pieces of information, the debate about the true objective to measure, the focus and the terminology is still lively. Many instruments, both generic and disease-tailored, have been developed, tested and used in headache and migraine patients. Advances in the field of health outcome assessment have made available a new generation of approaches and measures, both specific and generic, that are based on an approach called dynamic assessment. According to the developers, it is now possible to produce valid and reliable estimates of a person's perception of health by asking only those questions relevant to the individual respondent's state. Despite the large body of evidence about the intrinsic value of such new methodology, its {"}incremental{"} value when applied in research projects or in the context of programs of disease or outcome management is yet not clear. Thus, before these new methods are experimentally compared with more traditional approaches, in the general population and in headache and migraine patients, caution should be recommended and their use should be avoided outside formal research projects.",
keywords = "Computer adaptive testing, Health-related quality of life, Migraine, Quality of life, QualyMetric, SF-36",
author = "G. Apolone and P. Mosconi",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1007/s101940170004",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Journal of Headache and Pain",
issn = "1129-2369",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and migraine

AU - Apolone, G.

AU - Mosconi, P.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Although the genuine interest in measuring qualitative aspects of life has increased in the medical field together with our capability to transform patients' subjective reports, opinions and ratings in standardized pieces of information, the debate about the true objective to measure, the focus and the terminology is still lively. Many instruments, both generic and disease-tailored, have been developed, tested and used in headache and migraine patients. Advances in the field of health outcome assessment have made available a new generation of approaches and measures, both specific and generic, that are based on an approach called dynamic assessment. According to the developers, it is now possible to produce valid and reliable estimates of a person's perception of health by asking only those questions relevant to the individual respondent's state. Despite the large body of evidence about the intrinsic value of such new methodology, its "incremental" value when applied in research projects or in the context of programs of disease or outcome management is yet not clear. Thus, before these new methods are experimentally compared with more traditional approaches, in the general population and in headache and migraine patients, caution should be recommended and their use should be avoided outside formal research projects.

AB - Although the genuine interest in measuring qualitative aspects of life has increased in the medical field together with our capability to transform patients' subjective reports, opinions and ratings in standardized pieces of information, the debate about the true objective to measure, the focus and the terminology is still lively. Many instruments, both generic and disease-tailored, have been developed, tested and used in headache and migraine patients. Advances in the field of health outcome assessment have made available a new generation of approaches and measures, both specific and generic, that are based on an approach called dynamic assessment. According to the developers, it is now possible to produce valid and reliable estimates of a person's perception of health by asking only those questions relevant to the individual respondent's state. Despite the large body of evidence about the intrinsic value of such new methodology, its "incremental" value when applied in research projects or in the context of programs of disease or outcome management is yet not clear. Thus, before these new methods are experimentally compared with more traditional approaches, in the general population and in headache and migraine patients, caution should be recommended and their use should be avoided outside formal research projects.

KW - Computer adaptive testing

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Migraine

KW - Quality of life

KW - QualyMetric

KW - SF-36

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034756129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034756129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s101940170004

DO - 10.1007/s101940170004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034756129

VL - 2

JO - Journal of Headache and Pain

JF - Journal of Headache and Pain

SN - 1129-2369

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -