Health-related quality of life results from the phase III CheckMate 067 study

Dirk Schadendorf, James Larkin, Jedd Wolchok, F. Stephen Hodi, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Rene Gonzalez, Piotr Rutkowski, Jean Jacques Grob, C. Lance Cowey, Christopher Lao, John Wagstaff, Margaret K. Callahan, Michael A. Postow, Michael Smylie, Pier Francesco Ferrucci, Reinhard Dummer, Andrew Hill, Fiona Taylor, Javier Sabater, Dana WalkerSrividya Kotapati, Amy Abernethy, Georgina V. Long

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Background Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody of immune checkpoint programmed death 1 on T cells (PD-1), combined with ipilimumab, an immune checkpoint cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor, as combination therapy on the one hand and nivolumab as monotherapy on the other, have both demonstrated improved efficacy compared with ipilimumab alone in the CheckMate 067 study. However, the combination resulted in a higher frequency of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), which could result in diminished health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Here we report analyses of HRQoL for patients with advanced melanoma in clinical trial CheckMate 067. Patients and methods HRQoL was assessed at weeks 1 and 5 per 6-week cycle for the first 6 months, once every 6 weeks thereafter, and at two follow-up visits using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Care Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and the EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire. In addition to the randomised population, patient subgroups, including BRAF mutation status, partial or complete response, treatment-related AEs of grade 3/4, and those who discontinued due to any reason and due to an AE, were investigated. Results Nivolumab and ipilimumab combination and nivolumab alone both maintained HRQoL, and no clinically meaningful deterioration was observed over time compared with ipilimumab. In addition, similar results were observed across patient subgroups, and no clinically meaningful changes in HRQoL were observed during follow-up visits for patients who discontinued due to any cause. Conclusion These results further support the clinical benefit of nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. The finding that the difference in grade 3/4 AEs between the arms did not translate into clinically meaningful differences in the reported HRQoL may be relevant in the clinical setting. Study number NCT01844505.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-91
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2017


  • Advanced melanoma
  • Checkpoint inhibitors
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Ipilimumab
  • Nivolumab

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research


Dive into the research topics of 'Health-related quality of life results from the phase III CheckMate 067 study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this