Healthcare personnel resource burden related to in-clinic follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: A European Heart Rhythm Association and Eucomed joint survey

Giuseppe Boriani, Angelo Auricchio, Catherine Klersy, Paulus Kirchhof, Josep Brugada, John Morgan, Panos Vardas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims: A pilot European survey was conducted to assess the cumulative time spent by healthcare personnel for in-office follow-up of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), including cardiac pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Methods and results: Resource use data were collected during a session of in-clinic follow-up. Among 407 visits, 93 were scheduled and 7 unscheduled. Visit duration (total cumulative time) lasted a mean of 27 min for scheduled visits, and was ∼30 longer for unscheduled visits. Independent determinants of visit duration were: unscheduled visit (7.6 min, P 0.01), the need for device reprogramming (7.5 min, P <0.001), and the type of device checked, with CRT devices needing 9.1 and 6.6 more minutes than single- (P <0.001) and dual-chamber devices (P 0.002), respectively. Most visits involved two different types of healthcare personnel (239 of 407, 59), simultaneously. The most frequent combination was the involvement of both a cardiologist and a nurse (216 of 407 visits with both of them only, and 65 additional visits with also an internal technician, an external technician, or both). Overall, an external technician was involved in 18 of visits. Conclusions: In 'real-world' practice, the follow-up of CIEDs nowadays requires important resources in terms of time dedicated by specialized personnel, corresponding to cardiologists, nurses, internal technicians, and external, industry-employed technicians. These observations should be the basis for addressing clinical, organizational, financial, and policy initiatives targeted to optimize follow-up procedures in order to face the increase in the number of patients treated with CIEDs expected for the next years.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1166-1173
Number of pages8
JournalEuropace
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Joints
Delivery of Health Care
Equipment and Supplies
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices
Nurses
Organizational Policy
Implantable Defibrillators
Surveys and Questionnaires
Industry
Cardiologists

Keywords

  • Cardiac implantable electrical devices
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Follow-up
  • Cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Pacemaker

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Healthcare personnel resource burden related to in-clinic follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices : A European Heart Rhythm Association and Eucomed joint survey. / Boriani, Giuseppe; Auricchio, Angelo; Klersy, Catherine; Kirchhof, Paulus; Brugada, Josep; Morgan, John; Vardas, Panos.

In: Europace, Vol. 13, No. 8, 08.2011, p. 1166-1173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boriani, Giuseppe ; Auricchio, Angelo ; Klersy, Catherine ; Kirchhof, Paulus ; Brugada, Josep ; Morgan, John ; Vardas, Panos. / Healthcare personnel resource burden related to in-clinic follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices : A European Heart Rhythm Association and Eucomed joint survey. In: Europace. 2011 ; Vol. 13, No. 8. pp. 1166-1173.
@article{6eb3738331814b078442a98db93dfee5,
title = "Healthcare personnel resource burden related to in-clinic follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: A European Heart Rhythm Association and Eucomed joint survey",
abstract = "Aims: A pilot European survey was conducted to assess the cumulative time spent by healthcare personnel for in-office follow-up of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), including cardiac pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Methods and results: Resource use data were collected during a session of in-clinic follow-up. Among 407 visits, 93 were scheduled and 7 unscheduled. Visit duration (total cumulative time) lasted a mean of 27 min for scheduled visits, and was ∼30 longer for unscheduled visits. Independent determinants of visit duration were: unscheduled visit (7.6 min, P 0.01), the need for device reprogramming (7.5 min, P <0.001), and the type of device checked, with CRT devices needing 9.1 and 6.6 more minutes than single- (P <0.001) and dual-chamber devices (P 0.002), respectively. Most visits involved two different types of healthcare personnel (239 of 407, 59), simultaneously. The most frequent combination was the involvement of both a cardiologist and a nurse (216 of 407 visits with both of them only, and 65 additional visits with also an internal technician, an external technician, or both). Overall, an external technician was involved in 18 of visits. Conclusions: In 'real-world' practice, the follow-up of CIEDs nowadays requires important resources in terms of time dedicated by specialized personnel, corresponding to cardiologists, nurses, internal technicians, and external, industry-employed technicians. These observations should be the basis for addressing clinical, organizational, financial, and policy initiatives targeted to optimize follow-up procedures in order to face the increase in the number of patients treated with CIEDs expected for the next years.",
keywords = "Cardiac implantable electrical devices, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Follow-up, Cardioverter-defibrillator, Pacemaker",
author = "Giuseppe Boriani and Angelo Auricchio and Catherine Klersy and Paulus Kirchhof and Josep Brugada and John Morgan and Panos Vardas",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1093/europace/eur026",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1166--1173",
journal = "Europace",
issn = "1099-5129",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Healthcare personnel resource burden related to in-clinic follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices

T2 - A European Heart Rhythm Association and Eucomed joint survey

AU - Boriani, Giuseppe

AU - Auricchio, Angelo

AU - Klersy, Catherine

AU - Kirchhof, Paulus

AU - Brugada, Josep

AU - Morgan, John

AU - Vardas, Panos

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Aims: A pilot European survey was conducted to assess the cumulative time spent by healthcare personnel for in-office follow-up of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), including cardiac pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Methods and results: Resource use data were collected during a session of in-clinic follow-up. Among 407 visits, 93 were scheduled and 7 unscheduled. Visit duration (total cumulative time) lasted a mean of 27 min for scheduled visits, and was ∼30 longer for unscheduled visits. Independent determinants of visit duration were: unscheduled visit (7.6 min, P 0.01), the need for device reprogramming (7.5 min, P <0.001), and the type of device checked, with CRT devices needing 9.1 and 6.6 more minutes than single- (P <0.001) and dual-chamber devices (P 0.002), respectively. Most visits involved two different types of healthcare personnel (239 of 407, 59), simultaneously. The most frequent combination was the involvement of both a cardiologist and a nurse (216 of 407 visits with both of them only, and 65 additional visits with also an internal technician, an external technician, or both). Overall, an external technician was involved in 18 of visits. Conclusions: In 'real-world' practice, the follow-up of CIEDs nowadays requires important resources in terms of time dedicated by specialized personnel, corresponding to cardiologists, nurses, internal technicians, and external, industry-employed technicians. These observations should be the basis for addressing clinical, organizational, financial, and policy initiatives targeted to optimize follow-up procedures in order to face the increase in the number of patients treated with CIEDs expected for the next years.

AB - Aims: A pilot European survey was conducted to assess the cumulative time spent by healthcare personnel for in-office follow-up of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), including cardiac pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Methods and results: Resource use data were collected during a session of in-clinic follow-up. Among 407 visits, 93 were scheduled and 7 unscheduled. Visit duration (total cumulative time) lasted a mean of 27 min for scheduled visits, and was ∼30 longer for unscheduled visits. Independent determinants of visit duration were: unscheduled visit (7.6 min, P 0.01), the need for device reprogramming (7.5 min, P <0.001), and the type of device checked, with CRT devices needing 9.1 and 6.6 more minutes than single- (P <0.001) and dual-chamber devices (P 0.002), respectively. Most visits involved two different types of healthcare personnel (239 of 407, 59), simultaneously. The most frequent combination was the involvement of both a cardiologist and a nurse (216 of 407 visits with both of them only, and 65 additional visits with also an internal technician, an external technician, or both). Overall, an external technician was involved in 18 of visits. Conclusions: In 'real-world' practice, the follow-up of CIEDs nowadays requires important resources in terms of time dedicated by specialized personnel, corresponding to cardiologists, nurses, internal technicians, and external, industry-employed technicians. These observations should be the basis for addressing clinical, organizational, financial, and policy initiatives targeted to optimize follow-up procedures in order to face the increase in the number of patients treated with CIEDs expected for the next years.

KW - Cardiac implantable electrical devices

KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Follow-up

KW - Cardioverter-defibrillator

KW - Pacemaker

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051741363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051741363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/europace/eur026

DO - 10.1093/europace/eur026

M3 - Article

C2 - 21345922

AN - SCOPUS:80051741363

VL - 13

SP - 1166

EP - 1173

JO - Europace

JF - Europace

SN - 1099-5129

IS - 8

ER -